Are you claiming that it would not be possible to physically observe that you are married to a man? That when you see him, your reaction to doing so is the same as that of a straight man? That when he says your name, your brain reacts the same way to his voice as it would to some stranger? We...
Your hubby isn't a physical organism? What did you marry, an elemental sprite? Behavior and physiology are physically observable, same as anything else.
Starting to hear about tense inter-student incidents on my own campus, no doubt spillover from the escalating situations elsewhere. I'm unspeakably grateful that the semester is about to end anyway, before any of it can find its way into my classroom.
Anti-trans bigots are fucking idiots, who understand next to nothing about the real scientific disciplines whose language they ham-fistedly attempt to co-opt.
And you are being melodramatic for no real reason at all. People talk about "good" or "bad" or "defective" genes all the time, that's just a fact. A tendency I find risible in all cases. Mother Nature doesn't have opinions on what genes "should" be, or what they are "for" or "not for". Because...
But you have to consider quality, not just quantity. Sure, your kids may be great, but how many of them will be WH Cabinet members after the government is cleansed of corruption by our noble leader?
I was commenting on the teleological fallacy as applied to evolution. Emily can decide for herself whether the criticism applies to her argumentation, I am certain.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.