• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Making the US Senate More Representative

 
 
 
Here is where I found advocacy of MMPR for the US Senate, in the platform pages of Jeff Phillips, someone running in CA-12, a district that includes most of San Francisco.

Long Term Constitutional Changes — Jeffrey Phillips for Congress
Ranked Choice Voting & Proportional Representation

Moreover, we need to do away with the winner take all system, and establish Ranked Choice voting to allow the best candidates to rise in all Federal elections. Rather than telling everyone that they must settle for the “lesser of two evils”, the People will be free to vote for whom they believe is the best candidate, and select alternates down the line. We say we want to count every vote, so let’s make Every vote Count.

And because there are only two Senators for every state, each Senator wields immense personal power, some even contradicting the wishes of their party to demand special concessions. We can counter this by adopting a system of mixed-member Proportional Representation in the Senate, where in addition to the state senators, we allocate a number (say 20) Senators at Large, allocated proportionally to the total national representation of first-choice votes. This elevates those first choice votes, and these Senators, chosen by the Parties themselves, would be able to cut through the current stalemates that characterize Senate proceedings, and push for change and consensus beyond the two-party status quo. This system more accurately represents the will of the voters, and allows more political parties to have a voice in the way our nation governs itself.
Click to expand...
 
The tables did not get fixed after the move from vBulletin to XenForo. I will fix them.
 List of electoral systems by country
Polity
Dist
List
L/D
Germany
299
299
1
New Zealand
72
120
1.67
Thailand
350
150
0.43
Lesotho
80
40
0.5
Bolivia
70
60
0.86
Scotland (UK)
73
56
0.77
Wales (UK)
40
20
0.5

 Demography of the United Kingdom
What
Population
Fraction
Has parl
England
56.6 M
84.3%
Scotland
5.5 M
8.2%
X
Wales
3.2 M
4.7%
X
N Ireland
1.9 M
2.8%
X
Total
67.1 M
100%
X
England doesn't have its own Parliament, a deficiency that ought to be fixed in some way.
 
Making the Senate proportional by population, like the House, is an interesting exercise. For that, I decided to use the Huntington-Hill highest-averages algorithm as my baseline one. The overall number of Senators is twice the number of states, but each state may have more or fewer Senators than the average, 2. Each state has at least 1 Senator, also parallel to the House. I used the 2020 US Census data for all the present states, omitting possible future ones DC and Puerto Rico.

My code is in lkpetrich/Proportional-Allocation: For doing proportional allocation and representation

The result; each number of Senators and the states with that number:
  • 10 CA
  • 8 TX
  • 6 FL
  • 5 NY
  • 3 GA IL MI NC NJ OH PA
  • 2 AZ CO IN MA MD MN MO TN VA WA WI
  • 1 AK AL AR CT DE HI IA ID KS KY LA ME MS MT ND NE NH NM NV OK OR RI SC SD UT VT WV WY

To get a semi-proportional result, I decided to take the square roots of the state populations. I also took the square of the Huntington-Hill divisor, and both methods agreed:
  • 5 CA
  • 4 FL NY TX
  • 3 GA IL MI NC NJ OH PA
  • 2 AL AR AZ CO CT IA IN KY LA MA MD MN MO MS NV OK OR SC TN UT VA WA WI
  • 1 AK DE HI ID KS ME MT ND NE NH NM RI SD VT WV WY

I also tried setting an upper limit on the number of Senators for each state.

Max: 8
  • 8 CA TX
  • 6 FL
  • 5 NY
  • 4 IL PA
  • 3 GA MI NC NJ OH
  • 2 AZ CO IN MA MD MN MO TN VA WA WI
  • 1 AK AL AR CT DE HI IA ID KS KY LA ME MS MT ND NE NH NM NV OK OR RI SC SD UT VT WV WY
Max: 6
  • 6 CA FL NY TX
  • 4 IL PA
  • 3 GA MI NC NJ OH VA
  • 2 AL AZ CO IN MA MD MN MO SC TN WA WI
  • 1 AK AR CT DE HI IA ID KS KY LA ME MS MT ND NE NH NM NV OK OR RI SD UT VT WV WY
Max: 4
  • 4 CA FL GA IL NC NY OH PA TX
  • 3 AZ MI NJ VA WA
  • 2 AL CO IN KY LA MA MD MN MO OR SC TN WI
  • 1 AK AR CT DE HI IA ID KS ME MS MT ND NE NH NM NV OK RI SD UT VT WV WY

I could further adjust my algorithm to avoid that pileup of states at the maximum number of Senators. Since the highest-average algorithm adds seats one at a time, one could adjust it so that it will only add a seat if there are fewer states with one more seat.
 
Make the Senate more representative by eliminating the filibuster. Fuck minority rule.
 
lpetrich said:
England doesn't have its own Parliament, a deficiency that ought to be fixed in some way.
Click to expand...
That's not a deficiency, it's a symptom of English dominance over the rest of the UK, and over the UK parliament.

The Welsh, Scottish, and Northern Irish parliaments exist solely as an attempt to reduce English dominance over those regions. Similar efforts to devolve power to outlying regions who feel that Westminster cares too much about the Home Counties, and not enough about the rest of the UK, have been mooted for Cornwall, Yorkshire, and various divisions between the county and country scales, such as the North East, North West, Midlands, and South West - with varying degrees of public support.
 
There is an ad playing on TV a lot. It complains that the Dem candidate voted to allow a Chinese company to set up a battery manufacturing plant here in Michigan. I don't get it. Apparently to MAGAts this is a bad thing. I would think good paying manufacturing jobs would be welcomed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom