• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

No Kings Oct 18. Who's going?

:hysterical:

An inconvenient truth has emerged about the anti-Trump No Kings protests that swept the nation over the weekend - they were mainly attended by rich, old white people. In Atlanta, where the population is predominantly black, liberal attendees who took to the streets on Saturday were mostly white, even though they make up just 38 percent of the city. The vast majority of activists - some of whom were seen holding signs likening Trump to Adolf Hitler and ICE to the Gestapo - appeared to be white, privileged and elderly suburbanites.

CNN commentator Batya Ungar-Sargon pointed out the glaring disparity between those in the streets protesting and the less affluent groups they claim to speak for. 'These protests were overwhelmingly white, they were overwhelmingly elderly people. White boomers have the right to have a mass therapy session about the fact that Donald Trump won. But to call it a No Kings protest, to act like he is a king, is so utterly preposterous,' the journalist said. 'This is a man who won the popular vote, he won every swing state, he is a person who is enacting the exact agenda he promised he was going to enact while he was campaigning, and so what they are actually protesting is the absolute perfection of American democracy.'

One commentator, Reggie Brun, told his followers on X: 'No kings rally was all old white people'.

Daily Mail

:hysterical: Sounds about right. Too bad some of the old white people on here were to infirm to make it :hysterical:
So your argument is that if a political movement is disproportionately old and white, that delegitimizes it in some way? Why?
MAGAs are primarily old and extremely white too.
Shhh, let the bait do its work. :D
 
:hysterical:

An inconvenient truth has emerged about the anti-Trump No Kings protests that swept the nation over the weekend - they were mainly attended by rich, old white people. In Atlanta, where the population is predominantly black, liberal attendees who took to the streets on Saturday were mostly white, even though they make up just 38 percent of the city. The vast majority of activists - some of whom were seen holding signs likening Trump to Adolf Hitler and ICE to the Gestapo - appeared to be white, privileged and elderly suburbanites.

CNN commentator Batya Ungar-Sargon pointed out the glaring disparity between those in the streets protesting and the less affluent groups they claim to speak for. 'These protests were overwhelmingly white, they were overwhelmingly elderly people. White boomers have the right to have a mass therapy session about the fact that Donald Trump won. But to call it a No Kings protest, to act like he is a king, is so utterly preposterous,' the journalist said. 'This is a man who won the popular vote, he won every swing state, he is a person who is enacting the exact agenda he promised he was going to enact while he was campaigning, and so what they are actually protesting is the absolute perfection of American democracy.'

One commentator, Reggie Brun, told his followers on X: 'No kings rally was all old white people'.

Daily Mail

:hysterical: Sounds about right. Too bad some of the old white people on here were to infirm to make it :hysterical:
So your argument is that if a political movement is disproportionately old and white, that delegitimizes it in some way? Why?

Seems that is your argument fella.
 
:hysterical:

An inconvenient truth has emerged about the anti-Trump No Kings protests that swept the nation over the weekend - they were mainly attended by rich, old white people. In Atlanta, where the population is predominantly black, liberal attendees who took to the streets on Saturday were mostly white, even though they make up just 38 percent of the city. The vast majority of activists - some of whom were seen holding signs likening Trump to Adolf Hitler and ICE to the Gestapo - appeared to be white, privileged and elderly suburbanites.

CNN commentator Batya Ungar-Sargon pointed out the glaring disparity between those in the streets protesting and the less affluent groups they claim to speak for. 'These protests were overwhelmingly white, they were overwhelmingly elderly people. White boomers have the right to have a mass therapy session about the fact that Donald Trump won. But to call it a No Kings protest, to act like he is a king, is so utterly preposterous,' the journalist said. 'This is a man who won the popular vote, he won every swing state, he is a person who is enacting the exact agenda he promised he was going to enact while he was campaigning, and so what they are actually protesting is the absolute perfection of American democracy.'

One commentator, Reggie Brun, told his followers on X: 'No kings rally was all old white people'.

Daily Mail

:hysterical: Sounds about right. Too bad some of the old white people on here were to infirm to make it :hysterical:
So your argument is that if a political movement is disproportionately old and white, that delegitimizes it in some way? Why?

Seems that is your argument fella.
:rolleyes:
 
:hysterical:

An inconvenient truth has emerged about the anti-Trump No Kings protests that swept the nation over the weekend - they were mainly attended by rich, old white people. In Atlanta, where the population is predominantly black, liberal attendees who took to the streets on Saturday were mostly white, even though they make up just 38 percent of the city. The vast majority of activists - some of whom were seen holding signs likening Trump to Adolf Hitler and ICE to the Gestapo - appeared to be white, privileged and elderly suburbanites.

CNN commentator Batya Ungar-Sargon pointed out the glaring disparity between those in the streets protesting and the less affluent groups they claim to speak for. 'These protests were overwhelmingly white, they were overwhelmingly elderly people. White boomers have the right to have a mass therapy session about the fact that Donald Trump won. But to call it a No Kings protest, to act like he is a king, is so utterly preposterous,' the journalist said. 'This is a man who won the popular vote, he won every swing state, he is a person who is enacting the exact agenda he promised he was going to enact while he was campaigning, and so what they are actually protesting is the absolute perfection of American democracy.'

One commentator, Reggie Brun, told his followers on X: 'No kings rally was all old white people'.

Daily Mail

:hysterical: Sounds about right. Too bad some of the old white people on here were to infirm to make it :hysterical:
So your argument is that if a political movement is disproportionately old and white, that delegitimizes it in some way? Why?

Seems that is your argument fella.
Well, no, it isn't. I think that's fucking stupid actually. Why did you post it?
 
:hysterical:

An inconvenient truth has emerged about the anti-Trump No Kings protests that swept the nation over the weekend - they were mainly attended by rich, old white people. In Atlanta, where the population is predominantly black, liberal attendees who took to the streets on Saturday were mostly white, even though they make up just 38 percent of the city. The vast majority of activists - some of whom were seen holding signs likening Trump to Adolf Hitler and ICE to the Gestapo - appeared to be white, privileged and elderly suburbanites.

CNN commentator Batya Ungar-Sargon pointed out the glaring disparity between those in the streets protesting and the less affluent groups they claim to speak for. 'These protests were overwhelmingly white, they were overwhelmingly elderly people. White boomers have the right to have a mass therapy session about the fact that Donald Trump won. But to call it a No Kings protest, to act like he is a king, is so utterly preposterous,' the journalist said. 'This is a man who won the popular vote, he won every swing state, he is a person who is enacting the exact agenda he promised he was going to enact while he was campaigning, and so what they are actually protesting is the absolute perfection of American democracy.'

One commentator, Reggie Brun, told his followers on X: 'No kings rally was all old white people'.

Daily Mail

:hysterical: Sounds about right. Too bad some of the old white people on here were to infirm to make it :hysterical:
So your argument is that if a political movement is disproportionately old and white, that delegitimizes it in some way? Why?

Seems that is your argument fella.
Well, no, it isn't. {snip}

It is definitely the conclusion you came to and then try to turn it on me.

Why do you think so many old white people delegitimized the "No Kings Protest"? Why do you think so many old white people attended and so few blacks etc. showed up?
 
Last edited:
:hysterical:

An inconvenient truth has emerged about the anti-Trump No Kings protests that swept the nation over the weekend - they were mainly attended by rich, old white people. In Atlanta, where the population is predominantly black, liberal attendees who took to the streets on Saturday were mostly white, even though they make up just 38 percent of the city. The vast majority of activists - some of whom were seen holding signs likening Trump to Adolf Hitler and ICE to the Gestapo - appeared to be white, privileged and elderly suburbanites.

CNN commentator Batya Ungar-Sargon pointed out the glaring disparity between those in the streets protesting and the less affluent groups they claim to speak for. 'These protests were overwhelmingly white, they were overwhelmingly elderly people. White boomers have the right to have a mass therapy session about the fact that Donald Trump won. But to call it a No Kings protest, to act like he is a king, is so utterly preposterous,' the journalist said. 'This is a man who won the popular vote, he won every swing state, he is a person who is enacting the exact agenda he promised he was going to enact while he was campaigning, and so what they are actually protesting is the absolute perfection of American democracy.'

One commentator, Reggie Brun, told his followers on X: 'No kings rally was all old white people'.

Daily Mail

:hysterical: Sounds about right. Too bad some of the old white people on here were to infirm to make it :hysterical:
So your argument is that if a political movement is disproportionately old and white, that delegitimizes it in some way? Why?

Seems that is your argument fella.
Well, no, it isn't. {snip}

It is definitely the conclusion you came to and then try to turn it on me.

Why do you think so many old white people delegitimized the "No Kings Protest"? Why do you think so many old white people attended and so few blacks etc. showed up?
That is hardly unusual in the US. If you have a point to make, perhaps you should hurry along and make it. I'm not interested in a guessing game.
 
Back
Top Bottom