Search results for query: *

well, if the justice system weren’t so rigged perhaps he would have already been convicted of the big crimes and this one wouldn’t have mattered as much.

that’s a strawman many of us are not arguing. I know a couple of posters here are recommending total gun bans but not all of us are. There are ways to regulate guns that would lessen the impact of mass shooters without significantly impacting self-defense. This need not be an all or nothing...

That doesn’t explain to me how a system works with tariffs and no income tax? Presumably it means that everything becomes much more expensive because the government is collecting a Huge sales tax essentially. Right? So

Im no economist but how exactly does that work? Is it effectively a VAT?

that’s a high level of logic you are expecting to come from someone who has had his brain eaten by a worm.

Well, it's not Trump then because as bad as AI can be, it's not going to expulse such unintelligible word salads.

Have you seen the press lately? Of course they can. They can ignore anything they want. And so can their audiences. But I like Josh Johnson’s take on the debates:

He must agree with the rest.

comedy also depends on who the audience is. The same joke may kill with one audience and completely bomb with another. If he intended it to be funny he may have been more successful with a more sympathetic audience.

please, like that “u” is doing any work at all.

This may be a favorite peeve of school marms, but in this day and age it is far from the most objectionable grammar/usage issues I see.

Yes. It would be interesting to see the political reactions should Hunter appeal up to the Supreme Court on the grounds that it’s an unconstitutional infringement on his 2nd amendment rights. My irony meter repair business would go into overdrive!

In the upcoming election there is no excluded middle. At least not in this universe.

You’re either with us or against us! Just be discreet about it.

Even Kim Jong Un looks surprised!

so you at least seem to agree that it is the police’s responsibility to first determine if a gun is real before firing on the holder, yes? Maybe I’m misreading you.

You’re putting the cart in front of the horse. Much of those are stupid simply because cops are so on edge and willing to shoot at the mildest hint of threat, real or not. Being stupid shouldn’t be a capital offense.

if Beyoncé has a case in front of the court then perhaps it would be appropriate for KBJ to recuse herself. Would Thomas or Alito recuse themselves when their benefactors have cases before the court? We already know the answer to that.

But what if you don’t know if they’re “bad” yet? Yes, I think the police must accept that they could get shot at before they risk killing innocent people. You don’t. So that’s why in your view the killing of innocents is an unfortunate, but ultimately acceptable, consequence of police actions.

Please. That’s nothing. Now, had he forgotten to salute the soldiers who saluted him then that’d be a big deal I am sure.