But you said you “don’t accept” which means you have already reached a conclusion. Looking for evidence is the beginning not the end of research. So, since you don’t accept a statement as true you must have already done the research, so I would ask again, why do you not accept it as a...
I find it very unlikely that people's ignorance of science (especially one of her age) is the result of political meddling in the curriculum (from any side). Do you have any support for that contention?
I understand the current method. The part I'm not understanding, and it's likely just due to my lack of time to read through all these posts and understand the statistics being presented, is how we have accurate information about under- or over-counting. That would seem to imply we have a way...
So, the interesting question would be this: if the Republicans had not killed the bi-partisan border security bill negotiated in the Senate, would the Democrats have killed it? According to your logic, they should have.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.