AthenaAwakened
Contributor
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2003
- Messages
- 5,338
- Location
- Right behind you so ... BOO!
- Basic Beliefs
- non-theist, anarcho-socialist
A word from John Oliver
Wait, is it OK to compare a voluntary loan of a few hundred dollars to slavery now?
These racial insensitivity waters are tricky to navigate.
Wait, is it OK to compare a voluntary loan of a few hundred dollars to slavery now?
These racial insensitivity waters are tricky to navigate.
Only for people who choose to navigate them while blindfolded and deafened.
Not necessarily. A lot of poor people have no credit. They may pay their bills on time, but lack credit cards or bank accounts. And not everyone wants to go to their banker and let them know that they are about to become insolvent, especially if they are hanging a sheet until Friday. (A service that liquor stores once provided.)The terms on these loans are awful, sure, but they are targeted toward people that ruined their credit and nobody else would lend to.
They are stupid and ignorant and therefore deserve to get into trouble. Nice.Furthermore, nobody is holding a gun to their head and it's their responsibility to read all the terms and conditions before signing their name on the dotted line. So comparing it to slavery ("new plantations") is ridiculous.
The terms on these loans are awful, sure, but they are targeted toward people that ruined their credit and nobody else would lend to.
Furthermore, nobody is holding a gun to their head and it's their responsibility to read all the terms and conditions before signing their name on the dotted line. So comparing it to slavery ("new plantations") is ridiculous.
They are stupid and ignorant and therefore deserve to get into trouble. Nice.
Not at 300-1000% which is the common APR which is not loan at a high-risk and reap a respectable profit model, but a let's bilk the unsuspecting for every cent we can. Before these companies came along, 33% was considered "loan shark" interest and companies that made high risk loans did just fine. The system is designed to trap a consumer in a cycle of debt. In fact, if you watch the video the business plan of one of the largest and "most respected" companies actually spell this out EXPLICITLY in their training materials.The terms on these loans are awful, sure, but they are targeted toward people that ruined their credit and nobody else would lend to.
Furthermore, nobody is holding a gun to their head and it's their responsibility to read all the terms and conditions before signing their name on the dotted line. So comparing it to slavery ("new plantations") is ridiculous.
I'd add that while some of the terms may seem onerous, the high interest rate is necessary for the transaction. Loaning out $500 - $1000 at 4% interest would not be a viable business model.
They are stupid and ignorant and therefore deserve to get into trouble. Nice.
That is your general premise? People are stupid and ignorant?
Only for people who choose to navigate them while blindfolded and deafened.
Like Martin Bashir?
So a viable business model is to loan money to people who can't (or don't) pay their existing debt at rates that make this new debt harder to pay back?
Hmmmmm.
I don't doubt you make money making people pay high interest.
Loan sharks have always been successful businessmen.
Yet no one wants to be called one.
Funny that.
was born one mornin' when the sun didn't shine
I picked up my shovel and I walked to the mine
I loaded sixteen tons of number nine coal
And the straw boss said "Well, a-bless my soul"
You load sixteen tons, what do you get
Another day older and deeper in debt
Saint Peter don't you call me 'cause I can't go
I owe my soul to the company store
Not necessarily. A lot of poor people have no credit. They may pay their bills on time, but lack credit cards or bank accounts.
there is no in between, nothing between not loaning to poor folks and charging poor folks upwards of over 1000% interest? I somehow doubt those are only two choices. But do go on.So a viable business model is to loan money to people who can't (or don't) pay their existing debt at rates that make this new debt harder to pay back?
Hmmmmm.
I don't doubt you make money making people pay high interest.
Loan sharks have always been successful businessmen.
Yet no one wants to be called one.
Funny that.
The alternative is that these businesses not exist at all.
True.I don't like payday loan outfits and would warn anyone to steer clear of them. But people making these decisions are adults and ought to be treated as adults.
having information available and understanding information are two different things. And then there is the sales pitch. Add to that a person in, sometimes desperate need of cash right now, what people know can lose the battle of best choices to desire to believe the hype.It is not as if the high interest rate and payment timetable is not known before the borrower accepts the money.
On top of that, most states already regulate payday loans - including cooling off periods. http://www.paydayloaninfo.org/state-information So this seems a bit of faux outrage.