Jarhyn
Wizard
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2010
- Messages
- 14,691
- Gender
- Androgyne; they/them
- Basic Beliefs
- Natural Philosophy, Game Theoretic Ethicist
No, he based his argument about the inappropriateness of scientific definitions of "life" in discussing ethics on the arbitrariness of certain "scientific definitions".You are correct.But it was you who didn't bother to read pood's post or the cited article, and laughingly dismiss it despite you clearly not understanding the point
Pood based his moral argument on an authority claiming that water cannot be defined.
I didn't bother to go into his authority.
Frankly, I think Pood is somewhere between lying and ignorant. I have got solid evidence on that. I read the post about me.
Tom