• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

America's Failing Railroads: US Grain Not Getting to Market.

Nice Squirrel

Contributor
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
Messages
6,083
Location
Minnesota
Basic Beliefs
Only the Nice Squirrel can save us.
http://www.startribune.com/business/270840361.html

Regulators said Monday that the Canadian Pacific Railway, one of two key railroads that serve Minnesota farmers, isn’t making enough progress in shipping a huge backlog of grain.

Millions of bushels of corn and soybeans from 2013’s harvest are still in storage due to an overburdened rail system in the Upper Midwest. The big goal now is to ship last year’s crop before this year’s harvest — expected to be large — comes in.

In June, the U.S. Surface Transportation Board ordered Canadian Pacific (CP) and BNSF Railway Co., the two main roads serving the region, to provide regular reports of their efforts to transport last year’s crop. In a letter made public on Monday, the U.S. Department of Agriculture said CP is still behind.

“Despite some progress ... USDA remains concerned about CP’s ability to resolve its backlog and the lack of transparency in CP’s reporting to the [Surface Transportation] Board,” USDA’s Edward Avalos, undersecretary for marketing and regulatory programs, wrote.

“Grain elevators in some locations, such as South Dakota and Minnesota, could run out of storage capacity during the upcoming harvest, requiring grain be stored on the ground and running the risk of spoiling,” the USDA letter said. “The projected size of the upcoming harvest creates a high potential for loss in the affected states.”

We are only a few weeks away from the harvest. It's time for us to redesign our rail system.
 
Maybe the crop growers should have relied on a privately owned rail system to make sure crop deliveries occurred on time since private enterprise is the most efficient means to fix these problems.
 
I'm no geography professor, but I don't think Canadian Pacific is an American railroad.
 
It operates in the USA. It is an international corporation.
 
Nowadays a lot of railroad capacity is tied by with moving oil. Something that could be much more efficiently accomplished using pipelines like the Keystone XL. Unfortunately Obama has been dragging his heels on approving the pipeline for 6 years now.
 
Nowadays a lot of railroad capacity is tied by with moving oil. Something that could be much more efficiently accomplished using pipelines like the Keystone XL. Unfortunately Obama has been dragging his heels on approving the pipeline for 6 years now.

Yes, it's my understanding that it's quite possible to get railroads to move your stuff. Even if you have a lot of stuff.

In fact, they make their money by moving stuff.
 
Nowadays a lot of railroad capacity is tied by with moving oil. Something that could be much more efficiently accomplished using pipelines like the Keystone XL. Unfortunately Obama has been dragging his heels on approving the pipeline for 6 years now.

Pipelines already exist from the North Dakota oilfields. XL is for Canadian tar sands

One of the problems is the bumper crops coming out of the region.
 
Nowadays a lot of railroad capacity is tied by with moving oil. Something that could be much more efficiently accomplished using pipelines like the Keystone XL. Unfortunately Obama has been dragging his heels on approving the pipeline for 6 years now.
Only if the US had oil pipelines!
 
The problem is that railroad right of way is *VERY* expensive to obtain in cities. The railroads would prefer to let some loads go unshipped rather than expand their capacity.
 
Nowadays a lot of railroad capacity is tied by with moving oil. Something that could be much more efficiently accomplished using pipelines like the Keystone XL. Unfortunately Obama has been dragging his heels on approving the pipeline for 6 years now.

Pipelines already exist from the North Dakota oilfields. XL is for Canadian tar sands

One of the problems is the bumper crops coming out of the region.

If only the private market could come up with some way to let people buy or lease more railcars it could solve this problem. But alas, this is not possible.

On an unrelated note, I wonder where they came up with the railcars need to grow oil by rail volumes 5000% since 2008.

https://www.aar.org/keyissues/Documents/Background-Papers/Crude oil by rail.pdf
 
The problem is that railroad right of way is *VERY* expensive to obtain in cities. The railroads would prefer to let some loads go unshipped rather than expand their capacity.

Well that and the rail lines are built for 100 years ago. Some of these lines are only rated at 10 mph.
 
The problem is that railroad right of way is *VERY* expensive to obtain in cities. The railroads would prefer to let some loads go unshipped rather than expand their capacity.

Well that and the rail lines are built for 100 years ago. Some of these lines are only rated at 10 mph.

Speed ratings like that normally mean turns. You're not going to fix that without new right of way.
 
The problem is that railroad right of way is *VERY* expensive to obtain in cities. The railroads would prefer to let some loads go unshipped rather than expand their capacity.
Well that and the rail lines are built for 100 years ago. Some of these lines are only rated at 10 mph.
Typically those low speeds would be relative to turn radius.
 
Back
Top Bottom