Why do you think the Congressional Critters are on full stop while legitimate investigations proceed? Did the house not pass a "health care" bill? Did the Senate not approve a new SC nominee and a thousand Don the Con administration officials? Both houses also had to pass a budget to get thru the rest of the fiscal 2017 starting on 30 April. And they are still on the hook to deal with the silly debt ceiling that they can never agree upon, as the Treasury Dept. is now juggling the books to keep all the debt balls in play. Additionally, why would you expect a Congress that with a 97% retention rate to change its habits?
Lots of people everywhere have private meetings between private parties, so what?
You want our government run like a private party? I don't. I especially don't want a Presidential office in waiting, that starts making international plays while there is still a sitting President doing his job as head of nation. And if Russia subverted players in the administration, or if said players violated various laws, I'd want reasonable suspicions to be investigated. This is a far bigger concern that sex lives and Benghazi.
I'm not quite sure what to make of this comment. The concern is not just among Democrats or liberals, but also among independents and even many Republicans. Generally speaking, the only people who seem to think we should be looking the other way are conservative Republicans. So framing it as a "question for liberals" seems like nothing more than an attempt to marginalize the broad spectrum of public interest in whether the current President and/or his campaign team committed actual treason. Clinton's sex scandal almost got him removed from office, but nobody was talking about treason. Clinton arguably did try to obstruct justice when he perjured himself, but there was no broad consensus that his behavior rose to the level of an impeachable offense. It is bad enough that a Russian military intelligence operation managed to have such a noticeable impact on our presidential election, but collusion between Trump and that hostile power is a clear impeachable offense. Whether or not Republicans are willing to have a debate on impeachment (and the consensus seems to be that they are not), most do understand that. This is a very uncomfortable issue for them.
This question is a good example of a rhetorical technique known as
whataboutism: 
Bilderberg Group) are those who attend certain meetings, meetings named after a hotel that hosted the first one in 1954. Those meetings have their home page: Bilderberg Meetings | The official website. From that page:So to call it some left-wing plot is absurd.
