• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Anonymous To Out GOP Pedophiles

Cheerful Charlie

Contributor
Joined
Nov 10, 2005
Messages
9,357
Location
Houston, Texas
Basic Beliefs
Strong Atheist
This should be exciting. A campaign to out the pedophiles of the GOP. The groomers. The rapists.

....
"Over the next 50 days, we will be releasing every Republican sexual predator, abuser and enabler, focusing on underage and consent."
....


 
They ought to forward what they have to the proper authorities and STFU. If they really gave a crap about the victims they wouldn't compromise investigations to prioritize a public spectacle.

Edit: And by they I mean the specific individuals involved.
 
Okay, fuck Anonymous. If they have the info, they should be providing it immediately to the police. If they have evidence any politician is targeting and assaulting children they need to act, this isn't a partisan thing.

If they don't provide the info immediately to police, it is just "Anonymous" trying to look relevant. Pillow Man pulled this stuff too... though usually it would be everything in 50 days, nothing along the way, and then nothing comes out. Just HaroldCamping it.

*ETAish looks like Gospel beat me to the sentiment*
 
Who says Anonymous is not doing just that? By making this very public, it puts the appropiate authorities on notice to act. If They Are Not Doing So Already! It could very well be Anonymous is scraping various legal databases that may well include GOP scum sitting in some prison somewhere already. Since MSM , and most certainly right wing media do not seem to find these things major new stories, these things are mostly not well known to the general voting public. This is a stir the shit campaign.

The QAnon world loves to rant about "groomers" and pedophiles. Just not THESE groomers and pedophiles. OK. You QAnon clowns want shit media campaigns? You get one.
 
They ought to forward what they have to the proper authorities and STFU. If they really gave a crap about the victims they wouldn't compromise investigations to prioritize a public spectacle.

Edit: And by they I mean the specific individuals involved.
What investigations? The police have already been notified and they did nothing and buried the information... Unless of course this is actually the FBI or the police.

Where do you think the information came from? A vacuum?

Besides, this could very well be a sting process in and of itself: discuss the issue and watch whose behavior changes and how.

Imagine having bad eyesight in a dim room with a spotted floor. The easiest way to tell where the roaches are is to add a bit of light to the room and see which spots move.
 
I suppose as long as they have the victim's consent to use their traumatic life experience to produce a public spectacle it's all good. :rolleyes:
 
"Anonymous" should expand to outing pedophiles in all political parties.

But is is a fact that it has been far right Republicans trying to label the Democratic Party as the party tolerant of pedophilia and grooming children. Such as the wretched Majorie Taylor Greene. So they deserve this campaign.

Meanwhile, for our Christian Nationalists. We have online, long lists of priests, ministers, and pastors who have been caught molesting and raping children. Telling us the problem with America's low morales is not enough religion and prayer in school. Apparently that does not work as promised.
 
"Anonymous" should expand to outing pedophiles in all political parties.

But is is a fact that it has been far right Republicans trying to label the Democratic Party as the party tolerant of pedophilia and grooming children. Such as the wretched Majorie Taylor Greene. So they deserve this campaign.

Meanwhile, for our Christian Nationalists. We have online, long lists of priests, ministers, and pastors who have been caught molesting and raping children. Telling us the problem with America's low morales is not enough religion and prayer in school. Apparently that does not work as promised.

Exactly.
I don't disagree with LD. But I don't see this as attacking the perpetrators and their behavior so much as attacking the hypocrisy of the "Party of Family Values".
Tom
 
"Family Values"? The 1990's called and they want their GOP bluster back.

No, these days its about labeling Democrats as "sexual groomers of children" and calling them "socialists" (the Democrats, not the children). And "WOKE", don't forget the "WOKE". Because any sense of empathy that isn't capitalism related is "virtue signaling". The 2020s version of the GOP doesn't stand for any actual moral principle, that died off in 2008. They just target Dems now.
 
"Anonymous" should expand to outing pedophiles in all political parties.
We are in rare agreement here. Why make it partisan?

One caveat though: "pedophile" is a grossly overused term these days. Pedophiles are actually quite rare. The accusations usually involve contact with 16 or 17 years olds. Those are not children, and in fact, age of consent is 16 in many states and 16 or lower in vast majority of the developed world.
 
"Anonymous" should expand to outing pedophiles in all political parties.
We are in rare agreement here. Why make it partisan?

One caveat though: "pedophile" is a grossly overused term these days. Pedophiles are actually quite rare. The accusations usually involve contact with 16 or 17 years olds. Those are not children, and in fact, age of consent is 16 in many states and 16 or lower in vast majority of the developed world.
Not even adults who engage in ageplay and pretend to be, or who pretend to fuck, little babies agree with you.

16 is not old enough to be fucking anyone but another 16 year old, (or a 17 year old if they're doing it to piss off their parents). And even then the intent should clearly be to educate people about sex so that they don't mythologize and thus rush into full-on intercourse.

It's utterly unsurprising the high percentage of folks who espouse such views that 16 year olds are old enough to consent with 25+ are commonly pulled up on grooming charges.
 

Yeah sure ya betcha. That's a typically accurate statement.
DSA has 92,000 members.
The Democratic Party has some 40,000,000 members.
So how "many" of them is "many", Derec?
If every single manjack of the DSA was a democrat (they're mostly independents afaics), that would be
0.23% of REGISTERED Dems,
which constitute a fraction of Dem voters.

"Many" indeed. Only in The World According to Derec. 0.23%. Less than one quarter of one percent. Probably far, far less. But still "many", right? I mean, that's like a football stadium and a half!
This is the kind of mendacity that earns a person the respect they deserve.

[WOKE] A ridiculous term used by the Left and popularized by those spreading lies during the Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity shows.
FIFY
At least we agree it's a ridiculous term.
 
Also a warning to all the adults that might choose to pursue sick relationships with minors: I know of at least two folks, then minors, now adults, who specifically targeted adults in blackmailing schemes over their grooming efforts.

Do with that what you will, but if you stick your dick in "younger than 18", I'll give you even money on "too young to consent" a d "too young to consent + still smart enough to engage you with blackmail"
 
Okay, fuck Anonymous. If they have the info, they should be providing it immediately to the police. If they have evidence any politician is targeting and assaulting children they need to act, this isn't a partisan thing.

If they don't provide the info immediately to police, it is just "Anonymous" trying to look relevant. Pillow Man pulled this stuff too... though usually it would be everything in 50 days, nothing along the way, and then nothing comes out. Just HaroldCamping it.

*ETAish looks like Gospel beat me to the sentiment*
I would be surprised if they have anything that would be admissible.

1) Evidence requires a chain of custody--how did it get from where it was found to the courtroom. That would require whatever hacker got the information to testify--think they will?

2) Evidence needs to be shown to have been handled securely, not tampered with. This is a basically impossible burden for them. (And for basically anyone else who tries to play amateur detective.)
 
Okay, fuck Anonymous. If they have the info, they should be providing it immediately to the police. If they have evidence any politician is targeting and assaulting children they need to act, this isn't a partisan thing.

If they don't provide the info immediately to police, it is just "Anonymous" trying to look relevant. Pillow Man pulled this stuff too... though usually it would be everything in 50 days, nothing along the way, and then nothing comes out. Just HaroldCamping it.

*ETAish looks like Gospel beat me to the sentiment*
I would be surprised if they have anything that would be admissible.

1) Evidence requires a chain of custody--how did it get from where it was found to the courtroom. That would require whatever hacker got the information to testify--think they will?

2) Evidence needs to be shown to have been handled securely, not tampered with. This is a basically impossible burden for them. (And for basically anyone else who tries to play amateur detective.)

I agree with pretty much all of this.

Which is why it doesn't look like prosecuting perps. It looks like very partisan exposure of a particular flavor of GOP hypocrisy.

The number of TeaPartiers who either are or support douchebags is huge.
Pretending, as they do, that Democrats are the sexually immoral groomers is the hypocrisy being targeted.
Frankly, if I were a parent of a teenage daughter and had to choose between any of the last five Presidents to drive her to a school event, Biden and Obama would be okay and Trump the absolutely unthinkable last.
Nevertheless, Trump remains the GOP kingmaker and leader of the Christian Right.

Tom
 
Back
Top Bottom