• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Bill deBlasio went full socialist ...

Derec

Contributor
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
28,981
Location
Atlanta, GA
Basic Beliefs
atheist
In Conversation: Bill de Blasio
Bill deBlasio said:
What’s been hardest is the way our legal system is structured to favor private property. I think people all over this city, of every background, would like to have the city government be able to determine which building goes where, how high it will be, who gets to live in it, what the rent will be. I think there’s a socialistic impulse, which I hear every day, in every kind of community, that they would like things to be planned in accordance to their needs. And I would, too. Unfortunately, what stands in the way of that is hundreds of years of history that have elevated property rights and wealth to the point that that’s the reality that calls the tune on a lot of development.
I’ll give you an example. I was down one day on Varick Street, somewhere close to Canal, and there was a big sign out front of a new condo saying, “Units start at $2 million.” And that just drives people stark raving mad in this city, because that kind of development is clearly not for everyday people. It’s almost like it’s being flaunted. Look, if I had my druthers, the city government would determine every single plot of land, how development would proceed. And there would be very stringent requirements around income levels and rents. That’s a world I’d love to see, and I think what we have, in this city at least, are people who would love to have the New Deal back, on one level. They’d love to have a very, very powerful government, including a federal government, involved in directly addressing their day-to-day reality.

He basically wants to end private property in housing. All housing, public housing.

You never go full socialist, man!

Unfortunately this illiberal socialist easily got Democratic nomination again. :(
 
De Blasio is right, most people would would like the government to determine the situating of buildings and the rents charged in them. But they are wrong in believing it is the solution for low cost housing. Zoning is used in most of the country to boost property values and housing costs in the favored enclaves. This has a cascading effect throughout the city, raising housing costs in all parts of it.

The problem of high housing costs is particularly acute in New York City because most of the city is on islands where it is not possible for the city to expand into the sea at a reasonable cost. The obvious solution is to build high rise buildings to satisfy the demand for all levels of housing costs. But once again this solution is blocked by the very thing that deBlasio wants, restrictive zoning.

But de Blasio and the city probably don't have the ability to correct what is causing the high demand for highly valued housing in the city and the inability of the poor and the middle class to afford the available housing, the extreme income inequality in the city.

Yes, I know, this is my tin drum, but it is at the root of so many of our current problems, including this one. Rather than continuing with the policies to provide more income to the rich that intentionally increase income inequality, we should be trying with our policies to reduce the income inequality in the nation. The problem with the poor isn't that they are denied access to decent housing, it is that they are poor and can't afford decent housing. If the poor earned more money for the work that they already do they could afford better housing. This should be so obvious that it shouldn't have to be stated. But it never is, even by borderline socialists like de Blasio.

Reducing the income inequality would also, just as obviously, reduce the demand for high cost housing.

I don't understand the reverence and accommodation that people have for the rich in this country. If Trump proves anything it is that a large portion of the rich owe their good fortune not to their own efforts but to an accident of birth. Trump should stand as the poster boy for the need for a brutal, confiscatory inheritance tax.
 
Back
Top Bottom