• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Book about Nancy Pelosi

lpetrich

Contributor
Joined
Jul 27, 2000
Messages
26,852
Location
Eugene, OR
Gender
Male
Basic Beliefs
Atheist
Pelosi unloads on AOC, "The Squad" in new biography - Axios

USA Today DC bureau chief Susan Page has written a biography of NP: "Madam Speaker: Nancy Pelosi and the Lessons of Power" It will come out on April 20. NP herself encouraged family and friends to cooperate with SP in writing that book.
  • Pelosi unloads on the Squad, at one point adopting a child-like voice when discussing Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and offers the Squad this blunt advice: “You’re not a one-person show. This is the Congress of the United States.”
  • "Mitch McConnell," the speaker said, "is not a force for good in the country. He is an enabler of some of the worst stuff, and an instigator of some of it on his own."
  • Pelosi scoffs at President Obama for not being able to deliver his home state votes for Obamacare — "Why are we having a problem with Illinois?" — and bristles at Obama getting sole credit for the deals she got through Congress.
  • The speaker said she learned the art of politics from her father, Baltimore Mayor Thomas D'Alesandro: "What I learned from my father was everything ... I breathed it in ... Politics is every minute of every day. It is part of you."
 
Exclusive: How Donald Trump upended Nancy Pelosi’s plans, then she unraveled his in USA Today
This story is adapted from “Madam Speaker: Nancy Pelosi and the Lessons of Power,” which will be published April 20 by Twelve Books. Author Susan Page, the Washington Bureau chief of USA TODAY, conducted 10 interviews with Pelosi for this biography and interviewed more than 150 other friends, family members, political allies and adversaries.
The excerpt presented how NP reacted to 2016 Election Day.
As the polls were beginning to close, the House Democratic leader headed to the set of PBS NewsHour in suburban Virginia for an interview.

On the air, Pelosi projected nothing but positivity about what was going to happen. “We will, of course, retain the White House, with the election of Hillary Clinton,” she declared flatly. “It will be close, but we will regain the United States Senate. And we will pick up many seats in the House of Representatives.”

“Why are you so confident about the White House?” anchor Judy Woodruff asked.

“Because I’m confident in the American people,” Pelosi answered.

When Woodruff opened the interview by noting that Pelosi was the highest-ranking female politician in American history, she replied with a smile, “I’m counting the minutes to relinquish that title.” At the end, when the journalist repeated that distinction, Pelosi looked theatrically at her watch and replied, “For the moment! For the moment!”
She was re-elected to the House that year, and some people claim that she was thinking of making her upcoming term her last term.

But NP was as started as many other people at who won: Donald Trump. Though he lost the popular vote, he had unexpected victories in PA, MI, and WI, though they were squeakers. But those victories were enough to give him an Electoral-College victory.
Even more than being disappointed that Hillary Clinton had lost, Nancy Pelosi was horrified over the candidate who had won. The shock and pain she felt that night when she realized Donald Trump would win the presidency “was physical; it was actually physical,” she told me. “Like a mule kicking you in the back over and over again.” Trump’s improbable victory changed his life and the country’s trajectory. It changed her life as well.

...
“I was like, ‘How could it be that person is going to be president of the United States?’” Pelosi told me. It wasn’t just that the glass ceiling for women in American politics had been left intact. “That was saddening, but the election of Donald Trump was stunningly scary, and it was justified to be scared. How could they elect such a person – who talked that way about women, who was so crude and … to me, creepy.”
 
And four years, two months later, some of that man's most fervent, criminal idolaters hunted her in the halls of the Capitol, calling her name derisively in falsetto voices. They would have wrung her neck.
He did bring us to our lowest point since slavery.
 
Trump was willing to consider working with NP if the Republicans lost the House.
... “I’ll be honest with you, if the Democrats get in, I think I’ll be able to work with them,” he said. “They need me. They don’t want to sit there and for two years do nothing. They want to get things passed.”

But his view of her would change, and radically. Pelosi would become the unyielding counterpart to Trump, consistently able to get under his skin. She had the power to stand up to him and the aplomb to stare him down, the singular figure who would decide whether and when he would be impeached. ...
SP interviewed NP herself for the book.
Nancy Pelosi is a tough interview. She is disciplined and precise. She is unapologetic about repeating the same talking points. She isn’t inclined to indulge in speculation, to discuss the what-ifs. She is rarely willing to dish.
SP asked NP for her high-school and college transcripts and NP turned her down. She was appalled. "I'm a very private person", she explained. Barbara Bush, wife of George Bush I, was much more willing.
“Although I fear she will be unimpressed,” she wrote, “I am giving my permission for Susan Page to have access to my academic records at Ashley Hall.”
SP did her research over several months, including interviews with NP over that time.
(I wasn’t sure she would invite me back after the first interview, when I took a bite into the Dove ice cream bar she had offered and sent tiny shards of the dark chocolate shell flying onto her pristine cream- colored carpet.)

The second interview, sans treats, was on the summer afternoon in July 2019 when her dispute with the Squad had exploded; her anger at the four new progressive congresswomen was palpable. The fourth interview fell on the autumn day in November that Trump’s impeachment hearings began in the House. Then, she was almost preternaturally calm.
SP interviewed NP again later that year and in 2020.
 
Her gender was groundbreaking. Her legislative achievements would be as well. In 2008, during a financial meltdown that threatened to ignite another Great Depression, Pelosi pushed through an unpopular Wall Street bailout – rescuing Bush, a Republican president, and the nation’s economy – even though the GOP didn’t deliver the votes promised from its side of the aisle. Two years later, with Democrat Barack Obama in the White House, she muscled through the Affordable Care Act after almost everyone else doubted it could be done.

Yet Nancy Pelosi was regularly demonized and routinely underestimated.
Part of it was likely sexism.
Some of it also reflected her own particular combination of strengths and weaknesses. She was a master of the inside game of politics. “One of the very best inside political players that I’ve ever seen,” Hillary Clinton told me. But even after decades in office, Nancy Pelosi wasn’t particularly skilled at the outside game. She was never a compelling orator. ... Nancy Pelosi typically came across as determined, focused, even fierce – all qualities that helped her rise in a man’s world. Only occasionally would she display flashes of the warmth and humor that her friends described. She was so disciplined that she could seem robotic. She had to work to slow down her breathless staccato. She would sometimes stumble over words, prompting detractors to falsely accuse her of being drunk, although in fact she rarely had a drink beyond a sip of champagne on celebratory occasions.

Then a curiosity about NP and Trump.
President Trump rattled her publicly only once – during a State of the Union address that included the presentation of the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Rush Limbaugh – but Pelosi regularly rattled him. When he stomped out of a White House meeting after a confrontation over funding a wall along the Mexican border, she was dismissive.

“It’s a temper tantrum by the president,” she said.

Seems to me that she has a lot of the Big Five trait conscientiousness - diligence, orderliness, and the like. Something that Trump lacked.
 
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi through the years - lots of pictures

Exclusive: How Ted Kennedy and Nancy Pelosi pushed Barack Obama to go big on health care - USA Today
“The only way for us to do it was if the House was, at some point, going to hold its nose and pass the Senate version,” Obama said. That was legislation House leaders had been describing as unacceptable just a few days earlier. “I essentially said to Nancy, ‘Look, this is the debate that’s been had in the White House. My strong preference is that we go with a robust, full package, but the only package, at this point, we can get passed is the Senate bill. We could potentially bleep some provisions that you guys consider particularly obnoxious, [but] there’s only going to be so much we can do.

“ ‘And, Nancy, I can’t do this without you. If you are not willing to work with me to work your caucus, to get them to pass the Senate version, we don’t have a path.’”

Pelosi first took the opportunity to vent about the folly of the other side of the Capitol. This may have had less to do with her admittedly dyspeptic views of the Senate than with the responsibility she felt to articulate the views of her caucus. Obama saw her complaints as tactical, not peevish.

“She wasn’t going to right off the bat come out and say, ‘Yeah, I guess we just have to pass the Senate bill,’ because this is an example of her savvy,” Obama told me. “After spending about half an hour describing how feckless and incompetent the Senate was, she then proceeded to say, ‘Well, of course we have no choice but to go ahead and get the whole thing done.’ Then it became a strategy and tactical conversation.”
Right-wingers called her a "San Francisco liberal".
But what that description missed was the fact that there were two sides to Pelosi’s political core: the progressive and the pragmatist. She was not only a San Francisco liberal; she was also a Baltimore pol. In that, she was following in her father’s footsteps as well. No other battle during her political career illustrated that duality more clearly than the debate over the Affordable Care Act. She insisted on a sweeping bill, despite the long odds. But she was willing to push through a version she saw as flawed when it became the only prospect available.
That was after Teddy Kennedy died and was replaced in a special election by a Republican, Scott Brown. As a result, the Democrats didn't have enough votes to overcome a Republican filibuster.
 
More from the book: NP vs. AOC
Inside Nancy Pelosi’s War With AOC and the Squad - POLITICO - "How the House speaker put Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in her place."

“Nancy doesn’t have much patience for people who don’t know what they don’t know.” - a senior Congressional Democrat on what NP really thinks about AOC.

A previous POLITICO article described her way of dealing as "an iron fist in a Gucci glove." The article continued with "She hadn’t survived as the top Democrat in the House for nearly two decades by ignoring challenges or challengers. Instead, she applied the lessons she had learned to win them over, or at least keep them at bay."
The relationship between the speaker and AOC, her party’s most charismatic newcomer, is complicated. Colleagues and congressional aides said Pelosi saw the New York congresswoman as a talented person but one who was often naïve about how the institution worked and unrealistic about what could be achieved, and how. She feared the Squad’s demands would imperil hard-won Democratic control — the slim majority that had put Democrats in a position to change the country’s course, but not to win every battle.
NP's allies often compared AOC to Bernie Sanders, a leader with an ideological vision, but one who was not very capable of getting much of it enacted. That's appropriate in a certain way, because AOC started out by campaigning for BS, and she was then recruited by some former BS campaigners to run for Congress.

From the article: "She was exactly the sort of fresh-faced, would-be revolutionary who had been giving speakers of the House trouble for generations. Pelosi saw them coming a mile away."

She told newcomers "I say to them, as advocates, outsiders, it is our nature to be relentless, persistent, and dissatisfied" and "When you come in, cross that door, take that oath, you have to be oriented toward results. Have confidence in what you believe in, have humility to listen to somebody else, because you’re not a one-person show. This is the Congress of the United States."

Then the squabble between Nancy Pelosi and The Squad.

After The Squad was the only four Democrats to vote against an immigration bill, NP stated in a NYT interview "All these people have their public whatever and their Twitter world. But they don’t have any following. They’re four people, and that’s how many votes they got."

AOC's chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti made things a lot worse. "Pelosi claims we can’t focus on impeachment because it’s a distraction from kitchen table issues. But I’d challenge you to find voters that can name a single thing House Democrats have done for their kitchen table this year. What is this legislative mastermind doing?"

He also called the Blue Dogs "New Southern Democrats" and tweeted about them "They certainly seem hell bent to do to black and brown people today what the old Southern Democrats did in the 40s."

A few months later, he quit that position.
 
Author Susan Page continued:
First, she insisted that there was nothing to see here, nothing to talk about. Reporters were hyping the story, she said; it was just Democrats being Democrats. “I’ve been here a long time,” she told me. “We have always had our differences of opinion and all the rest. And we’re not the Republican Party; we’re not a rubber stamp. I mean, that’s not what we are. No, I think it was fine.”

“Nothing surprises me,” she said. “Thirty years since I’ve been here. They’ve never seen any fights like what we had when we had Central America and the caucus was divided. NAFTA, and the caucus was divided. Iraq War, and the caucus was divided.”

NP would earlier tell newcomers, “Some of you are here to make a beautiful pâté, but we’re making sausage most of the time.” SP pressed her on that, and she got agitated.
“Some people come here, as Dave Obey would have said, to pose for holy pictures.” She changed her voice and mimicked a child trying to make a solemn show of piety. “See how perfect I am and how pure?”

Obey, a Wisconsin congressman, had made his share of sausage as chair of the Appropriations Committee. “Remember when David used to say that all the time?” Pelosi asked, still steaming. “‘OK, there’s the group that’s going to go pose for holy pictures. Now let’s legislate over here.’

“And that’s experience,” Pelosi declared.
Then
“They’ll understand when they have something they want to pass,” she said. “If you don’t want any results, you don’t ever have to do anything. But if you have something that you want to pass, you’re better off not having your chief of staff send out a tweet in the manner in which that was sent out. Totally inappropriate.”

By now she wasn’t bothering to mask her ire. “I’ve never seen anything like it,” she said.
I agree with NP there. Saikat Chakrabarti's comments are far out of line.
The speaker didn’t fault AOC and the Squad for being passionate about issues, or for pushing their causes as hard as they could. “I’m a liberal from San Francisco,” Pelosi told me. “I said to these people, ‘I’ve been you. I was pushing a stroller and carrying a sign. I’ve been you.’” She had chaired the California Democratic Party, calling it “The Left of the Left,” and over the years had pushed for single-payer health care and other progressive causes. “So I’ve been them. I know. I know that.”
By contrast, NP got along very well with Ilhan Omar.
 
Back
Top Bottom