• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Books that dramatically changed the way you think

:devilish:... I don't claim that his is always an accurate and impartial look — "History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.") ...

Churchill said, "History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it."

I charge Wiploc with skimming a post by Swammi. No lesser charges included: that one is already a serious felony! :devilish: :cool:
 
It should go without saying that if you're only going to read a single history of (3) The Second World War — by several measures the costliest endeavor ever attempted by mankind — it should be the same-named book by Winston Churchill. Negotiating with Stalin and Roosevelt, he was an "insider." He was the only one of the three aware of the Ultra Secret. (True?) And His Nobel Prize was in Literature; it would be absurd NOT to read him. I don't claim that his is always an accurate and impartial look — "History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.") — so feel free to consult other sources in addition.
You're reminding me, a book* that dramatically changed the way I think was Winston Churchill's A History of the English-Speaking Peoples. Highly recommended.

(* In four volumes)
 
You're reminding me, a book* that dramatically changed the way I think was Winston Churchill's A History of the English-Speaking Peoples. Highly recommended.

(* In four volumes)

Great book. I recall learning from his thorough account of the English Civil War. One memorable quote suggests that Churchill had his own approach to historical fact:
Winston Churchill said:
[The legend of King Arthur] is all true , or it ought to be ; and more and better besides.
 
Ken Keyes' books like How to Make Your Life Work, or, Why Aren't You Happy? and Handbook to Higher Consciousness
e.g.
Screen Shot 2021-12-22 at 8.39.59 am.png
and:
...As the watcher of the screen, you are perfect. The screen may be projecting a horrendous movie that is showing all kinds of pain and suffering - on the screen. Or the screen may reflect a happy movie that shows a beautiful sunset, a delightful sexual experience, or an enjoyable meal. But the essential you is the pure awareness that just watches the stuff go by on the screen of your life. Behind what you think you are - YOU ARE...
and
10. I am continually calming the restless scanning of my rational mind in order to perceive the finer energies that enable me to unitively merge with everything around me
Anyway I stopped having spoken thoughts and I stopped having negative emotions. I slept a lot less (which the books mention) and had a manic episode. I became detached and I thought I'd play whatever role I felt like at the time.
 
I wish I could remember the name of the book that I read in high school written by a holocaust survivor that survived Auschwitz.

That's when I began to question the idea that we live in a world created by an intelligent deity.

It was probably "Night" by Elie Wiesel or "Man's Search for Meaning" by Viktor Frankl.
 
I wish I could remember the name of the book that I read in high school written by a holocaust survivor that survived Auschwitz.

That's when I began to question the idea that we live in a world created by an intelligent deity.

It was probably "Night" by Elie Wiesel or "Man's Search for Meaning" by Viktor Frankl.
There's also Eddie Jaku and his book "The Happiest Man on Earth". He was a survivor of several German concentration camps during World War II including Auschwitz and died in October 2021.
 
Last edited:
Flim-Flam, by James Randi: the first mainstream skeptical book I ever ran across.

After Man: A Zoology of the Future introduced me to the wonders of creative nonfiction.

Rob
 
Just mentioning three of several:

What Is This Thing Called Science? by Alan Chalmers gave me a good grounding in epistemology. Along with David Hume's An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding it confirmed by conviction that empiricism is the best method to test knowledge while simultaneously making me aware of its limitation.

Animal Farm by George Orwell alerted me to the fact that my view of Marxist communism was naïve and unjustifiably sympathetic. This resulted in my second major change of how I viewed social and political conditions.

No changes were actually dramatic. They percolated slowly over weeks and months, and I was only fully aware of the extent of them in retrospect. 'Profound' is a more appropriate adjective to describe them.
 
Books that changed the way I think about everything:
Thus Spoke Zarathustra
The World as Will and Representation
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Myth of Sisyphus
Nausea


Books that changed everything about the way I think:
Plato's Pharmacy
Philosophy as Mirror of Nature
A Short History of Decay
Critique of Cynical Reason
 
Again, this is a game rather than a book, but Civilization III finally allowed me to understand the objection to first strike weapons.

If I get the Statue of Zeus, I will use it. If a neighbor gets it, I have to kill him before he can use it.
 
On A Pale Horse, by Piers Anthony

read this when i was 10 - it's just a YA sci-fi novel but its world-building involves christian concepts (satan comes out in public and gets into advertising to tempt more people to sin), and while reading the brain my 10 year old brain "yeah if god and the devil actually existed this is totally how it would be in the real world"

that thought was basically the wedge that was pounded into the faultline of my casual christian upbringing and by the time i'd finished the book i pretty much had completely shed belief in god or the supernatural in general, and the underlying lesson - the test of whether the claims made by the religious are easily refuted by simple observable reality - has been the backbone of my agnosticism ever since.
"A Spell for Chameleon" is still my favorite Piers Anthony novel. You gotta love the irony that the villain becomes king and everyone is happy. People can change.
 
Thomas Mann: Der Zauberberg (The Magic Mountain). The greatest novel of the last century that explains a whole lot of what we need to know as sentient human beings.
 
Our Christ: the Revolt of the mystical genius by Constantin Brunner

I read this book in 1997. It is a 1995 translation, the original published in German in 1921.

1938 synopsis.

When I look back on my life, there is a sharp line separating before and after reading Our Christ.

In the before time, I was something of a lost soul: history of intoxication and accompanying police trouble, problems as a student, conflict with family, professional disgrace, divorce, and ill health.

I had been raised a socialist, atheist and Jesus mythicist. I wound up as a practicing nihilist.

In the early 90s, I was trying to make a new start. In early 1997, I remarried.

A few months later, I came across Our Christ. I was searching for clues to our cultural condition, and saw that discussion about Jesus was probably a good place to look. It was the heyday of the Jesus seminar, and there were a lot of alluring titles to examine. I found Our Christ in the local university catalogue, and went up and signed out the book. I was immediately transfixed.

Since that time, I have read everything I can by and about Brunner. Much of it is untranslated, so I have made efforts to learn German. I contacted the International Constantin Brunner Institute and am now a Board member.

I credit Brunner with having given me my life, my true life.

His portrait of Christ is stripped of all religiosity. We have instead the great genius of prophetic Judaism. With that comes a radical re-thinking of Judaism and of its central concern, Jahveh. For Brunner, Jahveh is essentially nothing other than the principle of Being itself. He argues that the Shema should be translated as, “Hear, Israel! Being is our god, Being is one!” This re-envisioning opens the way for atheists to claim the entire Biblical literature as their own.

Brunner has opened to me the Bible as well as a great deal of other literature, Spinoza most significantly. Brunner has also opened the way to a general re-envisioning of science, particularly biology.

I would like to thank the iidb community for providing a forum for me to talk about all this. When I first came to iidb, it was with the idea that I would find other atheists who were interested in the historical Jesus and might appreciate what Brunner had to say. I found that iidb was pretty much locked in to the mythicist position. Our Christ concludes with a lengthy attack on the mythicist position, and I decided to use that as my way of promoting Brunner.

A few years ago, I found a kindred spirit to Brunner, Harry Waton. I have devoted much of the past few years reading Waton’s numerous works. Through Waton, I came across the work of John MacMurray, and with him my research into philosophy comes to an end.

I am now working on praxis. My hope is to establish a group that will work to operationalize the ideas of Brunner, Waton and MacMurray.
 
Back
Top Bottom