Wrong. The French government studied this issue. What they found didn't match the approved narrative, so they suppressed the report. But it was leaked. Google translate did its best...
https://translate.google.com/transl...cation.gouv.fr/file/02/6/6026.pdf&prev=search
"...At the origin of this movement they often evoke the decisive influence of young men professing a religion at the more pious, less popular and more intellectual, often graduates and having made studies in France, the Maghreb or the Middle East, some from neighborhood and others who have arrived more recently: those whom teachers call with a certain aggressiveness "bearded" and that students name with a respect mixed with fear "Big brothers".
...
Status of women regressions
This is probably the most serious, the most outrageous and at the same time the most spectacular evolution of certain neighborhoods. Much has already been said and written about a subject which the media have largely treated for a year. A recent ministerial report alerted the decline in sports practice among young girls in these neighborhoods. 15 We will not develop so not this subject. But the words of our interlocutors and the simple act of walking around around a school or college is sometimes a real shock. Everywhere control morale and male supervision of women tend to strengthen and take Obsessive proportions. You must have seen these women completely covered in black, including hands and eyes, accompanied by a man, often young, sometimes a folding the hand so that they do not have to sit on an "impure" place, that no one seems to notice as they are part of the landscape, and no one seems to take offense at the condition, to seize in a short cut the tremendous regression of which we are the witnesses. Still these "Belphégor", as many call them, are not they the worst treated, because there are all those mothers who no longer come to the schools to seek their children, and who are forced to delegate this task to an elder or neighbor, because they are totally reclusive at home, sometimes for years. As more and more girls are veiled, teenage girls subject to rigorous supervision, moreover exercised more by boys than by the parents. A brother, even younger, can be both supervisor and protector of his sisters. Not having a brother can make a young girl particularly vulnerable. Beside frequentation and behavior, clothing is often the subject of prescriptions rigorous: as makeup, skirt and dress are forbidden, the pants are dark, wide, "jogging" style, the tunic must go down enough to hide any roundness. In such a city we are told that girls have to stay on weekends in their pajamas in order to can not even get out at the foot of the building. In such high school they put on their coat before going to the board so as not to arouse any concupiscence. Almost everywhere diversity is denounced, persecuted and mixed places like cinemas, social centers and sports equipment is prohibited. Several times we were told about the recrudescence of traditional marriages, "forced" or "arranged", from 14 or 15 years old. Many girls complain about the moral order imposed by the "big brothers", few dare to speak of the punishments that threaten them or that are inflicted upon them in case of transgression and can take the most brutal forms, those that sometimes emerge on the occasion of a various. Violence against girls is unfortunately not new, which is more is that they can be committed more and more openly in the name of religion."
I think nearly all women in the west wear burkhas do it because they're really into it.
Pure assumption. You choose to believe that, not because you have evidence, but in order to approve of yourself.
The guy reading the newspaper and trying not to watch was priceless, too.
