• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Can someone explain this?

Don2 (Don1 Revised)

Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
14,396
Location
USA
Basic Beliefs
non-practicing agnostic
ap-18279560512020.jpg


I feel like it's a scene from an old movie but strangely with just one character.
 
Her life is a fashion shoot.And she got her sugar daddy 'cause she knew her looks would go.
 
Her life is a fashion shoot.And she got her sugar daddy 'cause she knew her looks would go.

True for too many females. But take cheerful notice that that is what the changes coming around are all about. Females will one day be judged by the content of their character rather than by the tone of their legs, tightness of their rear end and bounce in their breasts. Why is it a sin for Trump's wife anymore than any other female coming up in a male oriented world?

Females have been domestic slaves dependant on their male mates' status for recognition.

Hell, we in the US elected a black man before we elected a white woman. That speaks volumes about our cultural biases towards females. Not that any bias is necessarily good, mind you.
 
I realize that. She's very good at fitting into the surroundings. Her choice of clothing and pose is perfect.

Oh, I get you now. It's Trump's wife so it sucks. Right?

So your explanation of this photo is that you think I think it sucks.

So explain your reason for the thread, its title, your initial remarks and the fact that you located it in "political discussions".
 
I realize that. She's very good at fitting into the surroundings. Her choice of clothing and pose is perfect.

Oh, I get you now. It's Trump's wife so it sucks. Right?

So your explanation of this photo is that you think I think it sucks.

So explain your reason for the thread, its title, your initial remarks and the fact that you located it in "political discussions".

She's the First Lady, probably using taxpayer money, and it's frankly weird. Thus, I have asked for an explanation. Your explanation is that you think I think it sucks. That doesn't really explain why she's taking a tour of Africa by herself or why she's dressing like the evil French archaeologist from Indiana Jones, even if she looks much better doing it.

0_EGYPT-US-POLITICS-DIPLOMACY.jpg

She has a nice smile doesn't quite cut it, even though she does.

One could ask any number of questions and I don't claim to be super creative enough to ask them all, thus a vague question "Can you explain this?"

Maybe I could ask, how much money it costs. Or what is the purpose. What is she accomplishing. Which countries is she going to. Why is she alone. Why does this look like modeling work?

Also, can you explain this?

0_US-first-lady-Melania-Trump-takes-a-safari-in-Nairobi-Kenya.jpg
 
Or another question: is this damage control from Trump's "shithole countries" comment? Is Melania's role now damage control? She seemed to try to do that over the kids in concentration camps issue...so maybe?
 
Her life is a fashion shoot.

It kinda seems that way sometimes. If it is not a fashion shoot, then what's the content to the trip and what is she accomplishing?

And she got her sugar daddy 'cause she knew her looks would go.

Maybe. It's hard not to say money is the biggest factor in her marriage when Twitler is such a jag off.
 
Can someone explain this?
ap-18279560512020.jpg
Congenital deformity? HGH imbalance in childhood? Yet another model with painful and painfully misguided cosmetic surgery?

No, wait, I've got it. If you look at the ground where she's standing you can see a bit of the bedrock protruding above the surrounding sediment. That's how her nine-inch heels aren't sinking into the sand.
 
A horrendous harpy in front of of a beautiful ancient monument. She defiles it by her mere presence.

The pith helmet shows her utter idiocy - it's a sign of colonialism from the nastier days of the British empire.

She is truly an ugly person with superficial good looks, but she clearly has the IQ of a small soap dish, and no sense of smell.
 
All we really know for certain is she married for money.

I don't know the woman at all.

The most invisible first lady in a while.
 
Why would she dress and stand exactly like Rene Belloq?
Trying to symbolize the pillaging of the public treasure for personal power?

She does some really weird things.
OR she has a stylist who hates her.
Not sure which.

This is really mystifying.
 
A horrendous harpy in front of of a beautiful ancient monument. She defiles it by her mere presence.

The pith helmet shows her utter idiocy - it's a sign of colonialism from the nastier days of the British empire.

She is truly an ugly person with superficial good looks, but she clearly has the IQ of a small soap dish, and no sense of smell.

That looks like a Panama hat to me - I don't think she's taking the pith.
 
Back
Top Bottom