Creationists: Why The Eye?

[T.G.G. Moogly]

I would have no idea!

So, it's a little presumptuous to claim that the theory has failed if you can't imagine what a failure of the theory would look like...

I think you may have overlooked the in his post.

 

[Learner]

I would have no idea!

So, it's a little presumptuous to claim that the theory has failed if you can't imagine what a failure of the theory would look like...

Very true and I would say the same thing when in the opposite position. Currently the method of study is not available.

 

[Learner]

So, it's a little presumptuous to claim that the theory has failed if you can't imagine what a failure of the theory would look like...

I think you may have overlooked the in his post.

I am always overlooking things myself.

 

[Keith&Co.]

So, it's a little presumptuous to claim that the theory has failed if you can't imagine what a failure of the theory would look like...

Very true and I would say the same thing when in the opposite position. Currently the method of study is not available.

What are you referring to as 'the opposite position?'

 

[Learner]

Very true and I would say the same thing when in the opposite position. Currently the method of study is not available.

What are you referring to as 'the opposite position?'

Apologies was reffering that the dustmite was from the position of creationism and was trying the opposite perspective to say this couldn't be true. Meaning joedad is right that arguing against the proposition could not be demonstrated.