Dear Holy Moses! Cenk Uyguy Announces Congress Run And Plans To Legalize Beastiality!!!

[repoman]

If Howard Stern had run for office he could get away with his past prankish stayements and stunts. But Stern is way more famous and skillful than Cenk.

This was just Cenk doing a Howard Stern type bit to be entertaining.

Now his statements about Asia Argento get a bit creepier, especially given her knowing the then seventeen year old since he was seven.

It was him being the South Park "Nice!" (At Kyle's little brother having sex with his teacher) in real life.

I bet that if this South Park segment was done by a prospective SNL cast member it would kill their chance via social media firestorm.

 

[Keith&Co.]

It seems like a weird place to draw a line of acceptable behaviour. Shoot it in the head and eat it - fine. Stick your penis into it - not fine.

Have you ever given any thought to the fact that a man might get a disease from beastiality and not tell the woman he has sex with? More diseases would spread. This is the same thing Christians warned about with gay sex becoming encouraged and how this would lead to the spread of more HIV. Leftists once again laughed & ignored.

Do leftists ever think?

As i recall, there were leftists wanting public safety announcemenrs, public education, condom distribution, sex ed, blood screenings of blood donations, various steps to limit the spread.
But conservatives were sure that
A) HIV/AIDS was sent by gawd to punish teh geys
B) Free condoms would encourage sinful sex
C) PSAs would encourage people to sex sinfully
D) God would protect 'good' people from the dusease thst they thought had a sexual preference.

Do conservatives never remember their own mistakes?

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Our current cultural zeitgeist includes the idea that if you interview someone it means you support them, and that if you said something 20 years ago and changed your mind since then it can still be held against you.

It is Cenk's favorite tactic to hold against those he disagrees with.

That people are doing to Cenk what Cenk does to others is considered a sign of desperate fear of Cenk?

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

Our current cultural zeitgeist includes the idea that if you interview someone it means you support them, and that if you said something 20 years ago and changed your mind since then it can still be held against you.

It is Cenk's favorite tactic to hold against those he disagrees with.

That people are doing to Cenk what Cenk does to others is considered a sign of desperate fear of Cenk?

It really is poetic justice in a way. Cenk is getting what Cenk has himself dished out repeatedly. It's still wrong, and I stand for Cenk here against it, but it's hard to feel too bad for Cenk.

 

[marc]

Our current cultural zeitgeist includes the idea that if you interview someone it means you support them,

No. If you 'interview' someone and only give them softball questions, don't counter their outright lies, and give them setups for their talking points, then it is a sign that they support the person being interviewed

and that if you said something 20 years ago and changed your mind since then it can still be held against you.

If you have never disavowed that previous position, have never shown support for a different position, then it is fair to at least still question if that is still the person's position

It is Cenk's favorite tactic to hold against those he disagrees with.

except he has not done any of the things you are insinuating here.

That people are doing to Cenk what Cenk does to others is considered a sign of desperate fear of Cenk?

Strawman argument.

 

[Lion IRC]

It seems like a weird place to draw a line of acceptable behaviour. Shoot it in the head and eat it - fine. Stick your penis into it - not fine.

Have you ever given any thought to the fact that a man might get a disease from beastiality and not tell the woman he has sex with? More diseases would spread. This is the same thing Christians warned about with gay sex becoming encouraged and how this would lead to the spread of more HIV. Leftists once again laughed & ignored.

Do leftists ever think?

Love is love. Love wins. #L G B B T
You're on the wrong side of history Half-Life.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

It seems like a weird place to draw a line of acceptable behaviour. Shoot it in the head and eat it - fine. Stick your penis into it - not fine.

Have you ever given any thought to the fact that a man might get a disease from beastiality and not tell the woman he has sex with? More diseases would spread. This is the same thing Christians warned about with gay sex becoming encouraged and how this would lead to the spread of more HIV. Leftists once again laughed & ignored.

Do leftists ever think?

Love is love. Love wins. #L G B B T
You're on the wrong side of history Half-Life.

Right.

Because "For God so loved the world, that He ..."

destroyed mankind, including BABIES, with mythological floods. Then he regretted what he did because he's angry. Also, he's love. Even though true love doesn't have jealousy or anger according to Corinthians. So we're supposed to listen to a contradictory, morally reprehensible authority on morality.

No thanks. Religion is not the answer.

There are some legitimate reasons to consider, brought up so far, and more...


Among things to consider, here are two.

1. What if the animal isn't in agreement to it? How ought consent apply? How ambiguous is it?

2. What about spreading diseases? To humans? To animals?

 

[Lion IRC]

Half-Life is just using the same old, tired slippery slope arguments and canards we heard from the anti-same sex marriage homophobes. It's just scare tactics.

"...oh, if we legalize pet brothels, where does it all end?"

Don't worry Half-Life.
They won't force you to bake a wedding cake with Caligula and a horse two horses on top.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

It seems like a weird place to draw a line of acceptable behaviour. Shoot it in the head and eat it - fine. Stick your penis into it - not fine.

Have you ever given any thought to the fact that a man might get a disease from beastiality and not tell the woman he has sex with? More diseases would spread. This is the same thing Christians warned about with gay sex becoming encouraged and how this would lead to the spread of more HIV. Leftists once again laughed & ignored.

Do leftists ever think?

You're less likely to get a disease from sticking it in an animal than if you stick it in another human.

And to the extent there's a disease risk, you're the one exposed, not some innocent.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

It seems like a weird place to draw a line of acceptable behaviour. Shoot it in the head and eat it - fine. Stick your penis into it - not fine.

Have you ever given any thought to the fact that a man might get a disease from beastiality and not tell the woman he has sex with? More diseases would spread. This is the same thing Christians warned about with gay sex becoming encouraged and how this would lead to the spread of more HIV. Leftists once again laughed & ignored.

Do leftists ever think?

As i recall, there were leftists wanting public safety announcemenrs, public education, condom distribution, sex ed, blood screenings of blood donations, various steps to limit the spread.
But conservatives were sure that
A) HIV/AIDS was sent by gawd to punish teh geys
B) Free condoms would encourage sinful sex
C) PSAs would encourage people to sex sinfully
D) God would protect 'good' people from the dusease thst they thought had a sexual preference.

Do conservatives never remember their own mistakes?

Why do you call these mistakes? It's standard conservative thought--make anything other than marital, reproductive sex dangerous. So what if a whole bunch of sinners die? That just makes people less likely to sin!

 

[Angra Mainyu]

My bad, I now realize this was back in 2013. That explains the timing, nothing odd about it.