• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Democrats trying to unseat each other II

In conceding, Maloney reflects on a long career in Congress
In her concession speech Tuesday night, Carolyn Maloney said she believes when women are the decision-makers, “the agenda changes to include things that directly affect our lives, our children and our families.”

She displayed the same zeal for the same priorities three decades ago when she first came to Congress, saying in 1992 that voters wanted “a new focus on women, children and families.”
Her daughter Virginia introduced her: “I’m Carolyn’s youngest daughter, and I’m famous for being the first child born to a sitting council member.”
“People like our 9/11 first-responders and survivors who now have the health care that they deserve for their illnesses, thanks to my legislation,” she said. “People who are ripped off by big banks, even forced into bankruptcy by unfair, deceptive credit card fees and penalties, thanks to Carolyn Maloney’s credit card bill of rights.”

...
In listing feminist pioneers who came before her, Maloney said, “These heroic women fought sexist systems and misogyny that continues today as we know from my own campaign.”

Despite Maloney’s allegations that Nadler doesn’t have the physical acumen to continue serving, the two had only kind words for each other in acknowledging her loss.

Nadler said in his victory speech on the Upper West Side on Tuesday night, “Carolyn Maloney and I have spent much of our adult lives working together to better both New York and our nation. I speak for everyone in this room tonight when I thank her for her decades of service to this city.”

Maloney said in her remarks of Nadler, “He is a distinguished member of Congress. I share his progressive values and I wish him every success.”
 
Brand New Congress on Twitter: "The #BNC family is growing again! Who’s joining the slate next? You’ll find out VERY soon. But as Maya Handa recently said: "Grassroots organizing is no longer enough. Progressives need money to win." Can you invest in our candidates today with a donation? (links)" / Twitter

Who might they be adding to their slate?

BNC recently praised Mary Peltola for her special-election win, but she is running for the upcoming general election, against her two special-election opponents, Sarah Palin and Nick Begich. So is she next?

We are approaching the end of the 2022 primary season, and only a few primaries remain.

The upcoming Tuesday, Sept. 6, is the day of the primaries of Massachusetts, and it is the last day that a big-name progressive has a primary: Ayanna Pressley of MA-07. She is less prominent than her squadmates, or at least less attacked by the right wing than (say) AOC.

The week after that has the last primaries of the season, on Tuesday, Sept. 13, in Delaware, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. No notable progressive incumbents or progressives in any of them, but I'll still be watching.
 
ITT conservatives used to reprisals for stepping out of line confused by Dems, who don't actually commit to large-scale reprisals. Reprisal, on the other hand, does generally see reprisal against it among the Dems.

It's almost like there's this big tent.

In fact I saw "forced to redistribute inheritance" and I thought "fuck them, let's get someone else in that seat."
 
Yesterday, as I write this, was the day of the Massachusetts primaries. Ayanna Pressley won the Democratic MA-07 primary by default, because that nomination was uncontested. The same was true of nearly all the other House primary elections of that state, though most of the more prominent statewide offices were contested.

So she is likely to be re-elected this November.


Brand New Congress's newest endorsee is Maxwell Alejandro Frost, an activist who won the Democratic primary for FL-10, Val Demings's old seat in northern Orlando, Florida.

Brand New Congress on Twitter: "Although only 25, Maxwell has considerable experience organizing for #abortionrights, #gunreform, criminal justice reform, & #housingjustice.

He understands the way that working people & people of color are unjustly marginalized & left behind, & that's who he's running for." / Twitter
 
But the biggest news is that Yuh-Line Niou has decided not to run a sore-loser campaign against Dan Goldman. If she did, she would have run as a Working Families Party candidate.

Yuh-Line Niou on Twitter: "Our campaign grew because our strength came from our people. I'm proud of what the @nywfp and I accomplished together. This is just the beginning. Thank you from the bottom of my heart!! ❤️ (vid link)" / Twitter - with her statement on her loss. She seemed close to tears as she thanked her supporters and said that her activism is bigger than any one person and any one candidacy.

Alex Sammon on Twitter: "Save yourself seven minutes ..." / Twitter
Save yourself seven minutes: @yuhline has conceded the primary to Dan Goldman and is declining to use the WFP party line to run against him in November. A double concession.

Look at Massachusetts for where this debacle heads. A muddled progressive field in MA-04 in 2020 threw the race for conservative Jake Auchincloss in a very blue district. Progressives swore they would get him back in the next cycle. He’s running tonight uncontested.

Without @yuhline challenging him in November, Dan Goldman will hold this seat until he dies or tires of it. The very best case scenario is another screwball redistricting in 2030. Progressives are waving the white flag here for 10 years minimum.
Ryan Grim on Twitter: "Niou would probably have needed a minimum of $10 million just to be remotely in contention, so this is basically conceding to reality" / Twitter
Yes indeed. She doesn't have a lot of real-estate tycoons and Republican oligarchs who are willing to fund her, unlike fellow primary loser Byron Brown.


Seems like a big difference between the Left and the Right. The Left becomes tearful, while the Right howls with rage. Alex Jones has a water cooler with "Liberal Tears" printed on it - A Visit to the Infowars Studios of Alex Jones - DER SPIEGEL - and one can get lots of mugs and the like with "Liberal Tears" on them - which gives me an idea.

Label some hot chili powder "Conservative Howls of Rage".
 
Label some hot chili powder "Conservative Howls of Rage".
Maybe come visit and buy some Minnesotan hot sauce and label it "impotent conservative rage"

Mostly because their rage is really quite bland and milquetoast.
 
About Maxwell Frost:
Brand New Congress on Twitter: "In 2021 ..." / Twitter
In 2021, a group of his fellow organizers asked @MaxwellFrostFL to run for Congress. He said no.

He then had conversations w/over 200 union, community & faith leaders, & everyone overwhelmingly encouraged him to run. With his community behind him, he said yes!

Although he’s only 25, Maxwell has considerable experience under his belt.

Having direct experience with police abuse and gun violence, Maxwell was first called to action to fight for gun reform at the age of 15 following the Sandy Hook massacre.

He served as the Organizing Director for March for Our Lives, where he led a youth voter program that drove record turnout in the 2020 election.

In 2018, he helped lead the Florida ACLU’s fight to win back voting rights for over 1.6M Floridians w/previous felony convictions.

The central Florida community leaders know that Maxwell will be a fighter for working people, and we completely agree!

Help #BNC elect Maxwell Frost to Congress in #FL10 with a $10 donation now!

A policy issue that BNC is interested in:
Brand New Congress on Twitter: "The decision to expand student loan forgiveness is proof that the progressive movement is driving policy in DC. But we need to keep the pressure on @POTUS to forgive ALL student debt. Tell #BNC what student debt cancellation would mean for you.⬇️⬇️⬇️
(link to survey site)" / Twitter
 
Brand New Congress is now supporting yet another candidate: Greg Casar, a progressive supported by Justice Democrats who won a primary in Texas.

The last primaries of this election season were held today, in DE, NH, and RI. No notable progressives in them that I've been following.

So it's off to the general elections, two months from now, on November 8.
 
Brand New Congress is now endorsing John Fetterman, running for the Senate in Pennsylvania.

Who might be next for BNC? I'm guessing Jamie McLeod-Skinner, running for the House in OR-05.
 
Brand New Congress is now endorsing John Fetterman, running for the Senate in Pennsylvania.

Who might be next for BNC? I'm guessing Jamie McLeod-Skinner, running for the House in OR-05.
Every time I see Fetterman, I see a bass player in a metal band that's way past its prime.
 
Sam Bankman-Fried: After spending big in primaries, the crypto billionaire says he won't help Democrats win the midterms - "Billionaire FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried said he’d spend lavishly to elect Democrats in the coming years. But with midterms looming, his wallet is suddenly shut."
When Sam Bankman-Fried was asked during a podcast earlier this year how much money he might give to political candidates over upcoming election cycles, he offered an eye-popping ballpark number. The 30-year-old crypto titan guessed that, at a minimum, he would put down “north of $100 million,” enough cash to make him one of the country’s most important donors. Pressed by the host on whether he might even spend up to $1 billion, he answered, “Yeah, I think that’s a decent thing to look at,” adding that the number was “a sort of soft ceiling” on his potential largesse.

Even if that $1 billion figure sounded outlandishly unrealistic, the comments still seemed to promise a huge tailwind for largely Democratic candidates. After all, Bankman-Fried, who founded the global crypto exchange FTX and is currently worth about $15 billion according to Bloomberg, was one of Joe Biden’s top financial backers in 2020.

And though he did not pledge to fund Democrats exclusively, he said his top causes included pandemic preparedness and “sane governance,” issues where Republicans notably tend to be weak. (Pandemic preparedness is a major area of focus for the philanthropic movement known as effective altruism, which counts Bankman-Fried as its most important financial backer). Bankman-Fried got off to a hot start giving during primary season, too; his Protect Our Future PAC laid out $40 million, largely in Democratic races, making it one of the party’s biggest individual campaign players.

But now, as the general election nears, Democrats are starting to look like the victims of a political rug pull.
Rug pull?

Crypto rug pulls: What is a rug pull in crypto and 6 ways to spot it - "A rug pull is a type of crypto scam that occurs when a team pumps their project’s token before disappearing with the funds, leaving their investors with a valueless asset."

Three types of rug pulls:
Liquidity stealing occurs when token creators withdraw all the coins from the liquidity pool. Doing so removes all the value injected into the currency by investors, driving its price down to zero. ...

Limiting sell orders is a subtle way for a malicious developer to defraud investors. In this situation, the developer codes the tokens so that they’re the only party that is able to sell them. ...

Dumping occurs when developers quickly sell off their own large supply of tokens. Doing so drives down the price of the coin and leaves remaining investors holding worthless tokens. “Dumping” usually occurs after heavy promotion on social media platforms. The resulting spike and sell-off are known as a Pump-and-Dump Scheme.
It says something about cryptocurrency users that their social world is so full of scams.
 
Billion dollar slip-up: Why a crypto magnate is rethinking election spending - POLITICO
“That was a dumb quote on my part,” the 30 year-old founder of the global crypto exchange FTX and trading firm Alameda Research said in an interview on Wednesday. “I think my messaging was sort of sloppy and inconsistent in some cases.”
Good that he conceded that.
“I think primaries are more important,” said Bankman-Fried, who was in Washington for conference appearances this week. “Frankly, I could try and talk about pandemic preparedness in a general election. But most voters are gonna say, ‘That's cool, but like, I'm a Democrat’ or ‘I'm a Republican.’ That's not going to move the needle enough for me to go over all of the other issues.”
But even so, it's still good to get involved on the side of one's preferred candidates. Even if the district's voters are yellow-dog partisans, enthusiasm can still make a difference.

Bankman-Fried’s decision to sit on the sidelines as election day approaches is strange. For one thing, it’s antithetical to the things the man says he cares about: After spending largely in intra-Dem contests where both candidates were far more pro pandemic-preparedness than their eventual Republican opponents, he is walking away at the critical moment when politicians who don’t care much about the threat of deadly viruses could win out.
That's what I thought.

Then noting
While many of the party’s individual candidates have been able fundraisers, independent expenditure groups affiliated with congressional Democrats have lagged behind their Republican counterparts.
and
Leaving aside the money it wasted on primary losers, Protect Our Future’s disappearing act has left Bankman-Fried’s winners in a pinch as well. Some of the candidates he pushed through their primaries, such as Francis Conole in New York and Michelle Vallejo in Texas, are now cash-starved in their contests with Republicans, and have become the responsibility of other Democratic and progressive groups to drag across the finish line.

Meanwhile, Democratic groups are bailing on a number of winnable races because of money shortages. They aren’t airing TV ads in six of the 14 Republican-held districts that went for Biden in 2020, which represent the biggest pickup opportunities for the party’s five-seat House majority. They’ve also cut bait on close contests involving Democratic incumbents in Arizona, Wisconsin, Texas, and Michigan. “The No. 1 factor here is money,” Tim Persico, executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, told Politico.
House Democrats retrench as GOP money floods the map - POLITICO - "The party isn't airing ads in six of the 14 GOP districts Joe Biden carried in 2020, as it directs money to help incumbents under threat."

Bankman-Fried’s operation isn’t the only big money entity to have left Democrats in the lurch. Almost every major moderate super PAC that spent lavishly in Democratic primaries in the spring and summer has stopped spending to help Democrats with just weeks to go.

United Democracy Project, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s super PAC, spent tens of millions in Democratic primaries, often opposing progressives. Their only foray into general election spending has been two ad buys totaling $200k in a Democrat-on-Democrat race in California, boosting Kevin Mullin and opposing David Canepa.

Democratic Majority for Israel, another multimillion spender closely allied with those Israel lobby groups, has also gone quiet in the general, despite having “Democratic majority” in the name.

...
A third multimillion dollar spender, Mainstream Democrats PAC, also shows no ad buys since primary season ended.
Could it be that their donors are happy with Republicans winning? Or are they saving up for upcoming primaries?
 
The burden has fallen to progressive groups to pick up the slack. The grassroots organizer Indivisible just launched a new program explicitly aimed towards maintaining the House majority. They’ve pledged resources towards electing a number of candidates that are far from “progressive” by reputation, including New Jersey moderate Tom Malinowski, a Democratic member of the Problem Solvers caucus who routinely opposes progressive priorities. Other progressive groups have similarly thrown in for non-progressive candidates, hoping to keep the narrow House majority intact.

“All these groups who spent huge money in the primaries are declining to show up,” Leah Greenberg, executive director of Indivisible, told me. “Progressives are scraping together all the money and volunteers we can for everyone, to keep the majority.”
Vulnerable Dems fret after getting a shock: AOC’s campaign cash - POLITICO - "Ocasio-Cortez’s largesse — and an oversight at the campaign headquarters — has raised awkward questions among her colleagues."

She did it for that reason, to have more Democrats in the House, even if they didn't see eye-to-eye with her on a lot of issues. Many of them didn't want her money, and on the other side, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez funds the CIA Democrats - World Socialist Web Site

Finally,
Meanwhile, the Democratic National Committee just last month blocked a vote on a proposed dark money ban on primaries, after those aforementioned super PACs helped shatter spending records in this year’s primary season. “This is the problem with allowing billionaires and outside groups to spend infinite money when they’re not invested in the health of the Democratic majority,” added Greenberg when we spoke on the phone. “It’s been an infuriating coda to an infuriating primary season.”
 
Doyle “pro-fish, pro-choice, pro-worker” Canning on Twitter: "Oregon Progressives: Don’t get catfished by The Choker trying to take our seat in Congress. #VoteDemocratStraightDownTheBallot (pic link)" / Twitter
Doyle Canning, an attorney and climate activist, ran against Hoyle in the May primary and criticized her record on environmental issues. Canning, who has since endorsed Hoyle and is campaigning for her, said the polls seemed like a cynical attempt by Republicans to sow confusion and peel the progressive Democrats who supported her away from Hoyle.

"They know that they can't win fair and square on the MAGA platform in this district, so they're using misleading push polling and dirty tricks to try to confuse progressives," Canning said. "We're not going to be used by the party of Donald Trump to elect a MAGA Republican to Congress."
Some Green Party candidate who has the potential to be a spoiler, like Ralph Nader in 2000 or Jill Stein in 2016.
 
Opinion | A Lost Manuscript Shows the Fire Barack Obama Couldn’t Reveal on the Campaign Trail - The New York Times
Mr. Obama left Harvard with a blueprint for remaking American democracy. Written with Robert Fisher, a friend and former economics professor, the 250-page manuscript had the working title of “Transformative Politics.”
But then he became too busy with other things to do much with that manuscript.
Speaking with a candor he would soon be unable to afford, Mr. Obama directed his fire across the entire political spectrum. He denounced a broken status quo in which cynical Republicans outmaneuvered feckless Democrats in a racialized culture war, leaving most Americans trapped in a system that gave them no real control over their lives. Although his sympathies were clearly with the left, Mr. Obama chided liberals for making do with a “rudderless pragmatism,” and he flayed activists — with the civil rights establishment as his chief example — for asking the judiciary to hand out victories they couldn’t win at the polls. Progressives talked a good game about democracy, but they didn’t really seem to believe in it.
That's a big problem with abortion and same-sex marriage. Depending on the courts has been a lot of trouble.

Then talking about civil-rights activist Bayard Rustin's proposal for a "March on Washington coalition" of liberals, blacks, and blue-collar whites.
Mr. Rustin discussed coalition politics with the same passion he brought to crusading against Jim Crow. “We cannot talk about the democratic road to freedom,” he said, “unless we are talking about building a majority movement.” Republicans and Democrats had been divided along economic lines since the New Deal, when working-class voters stampeded into the Democratic column. Now Mr. Rustin saw the opportunity to turn the Democratic Party into a vehicle for both racial and economic justice, if activists turned the March on Washington coalition into a durable majority.
Barack Obama was at that time barely out of diapers, but when he grew up, he became a nihilist, then a sort of GQ Marxist, then a community organizer.
 
Back
Top Bottom