Something I'm catching up on:
Three Traps for Zohran - also relevant for similar candidates.
Candidates which are collectively a great argument as to why partisan primaries are a bad idea, especially closed primaries and those that allow plurality rather than requiring a majority.
First discussing India Walton, who primaried Buffalo Mayor Byron Brown in 2021, only to be defeated by him doing a write-in campaign with the help of big donors and the Republican Party. "Back in 2021, the establishment strategy against her was to invent an endless series of supposed scandals and force her to address those instead of her actual policy agenda, thus robbing her of momentum." Like
Unfortunately later attempts to stop DSA candidates have proven less successful.
Also, those scandals weren't invented, but are true things from her past that show a pattern of poor judgment. Similar to one Graham Plantner.
Branko Marcetic (via Alex Slopic (via lpetrich)) said:
(Byron) Brown successfully turned the election debate to the petty personal mistakes of Walton, a woman who became a working mother as a teen, before becoming a nurse: she was charged with $295 worth of food stamp fraud in 2003; she owed $749 in back taxes in 2004; she was stopped for driving with a suspended license; she visited her cousin before he went to jail; she failed to show up for a court summons sent to the wrong address; she wrote a rude Facebook post; and her car was towed just last month over unpaid parking tickets.
Note Marcetic's bias - he is writing for the commie rag
Jacobin.
Taken together, these things do show somebody exhibiting poor judgment. If she can barely run her own life, why should the people of Buffalo trust her to run their city?
What's that about visiting her cousin? Was there some involvement in his criminal activities?
And that "rude Facebook post" was a sexist and racist attack on a white city councilor.
Alex Slopic (via lpetrich) said:
There was a distinct note of sexism in the focus on politically irrelevant facts like her becoming a mother as a teenager,
It's not sexist, and having unprotected sex when not wanting a baby shows a lack of judgment. A male politician getting someone pregnant as a teen would be fair game too, so don't even try with the "distinct note of sexism" nonsense.
And that wasn’t the worst of it. At one point, the chair of the New York Democratic Party explained his refusal to endorse Walton by comparing her to a Ku Klux Klan leader, saying “[if] he wins the Democratic line, I have to endorse David Duke? I don’t think so.” To him, apparently, a socialist and a white supremacist would be equally unacceptable.
Well, they are both extremist ideologies. The chair's point is that just because somebody wins the Democratic primary does not mean other Democrats should feel obligated to endorse that person with no regard to who that person is.
Unfortunately, it did not.
In a recent interview with Briahna Joy Gray, Walton says one of her biggest regrets is that she was too conciliatory: “I felt as if I needed to bend, and capitulate, and moderate, and become a part of the party that never wanted me in the first place, and I wish that I had stayed the course.”
It was the same with Jeremy Corbyn, who tried his best to make peace with the people who slandered him as an antisemite, always apologizing for this or that.
Jeremy Corbyn is an antisemite. No slander here.
Which he has been. More recently, both Graham Platner and Darializa Avila Chevalier have survived some of the more extreme statements and actions in their pasts.
And it is to Democratic Party's great shame that it lets these people get away with it. Avila Chevalier for example attended a pro-Hamas demo right after the 10/7 atrocities.
But there’s a difference between getting elected and achieving your goals, and the mayorship of a major U.S. city can easily become a toxic job where the incumbent is blamed for everything wrong in town. Chicago’s Mayor Brandon Johnson has been finding that out.
I still don't know what Chicagoans were thinking electing him.
Then former US President Barack Obama. Like Zohran Mamdani, he has an odd name, and both ZM and BO were labeled Communists and radical Islamists. His campaigners also recruited an impressive number of campaign volunteers. After he was elected, it was a different story.
But it wasn't a "different story". Unlike Comrade Cardamom, Obama did not run on socialism, he did not call for "seizing the means of production", or on being a Muslim who hates Israel. He ran on hope, and "there are no blue states and red states, just the United States". He ran on an "all of the above" energy policy and actually appointed physicists for SecEnergy, not another career politician with a JD (like Biden's pick). I.e. unlike Mamdani and his DSA Ilk, Obama ran as a uniter, not a divider. As a uniter, compromise and moderation are not dirty words.
But he sold off every principle he ever claimed to have, one by one.
Well, he did sell off the "all of the above" energy policy principle when he blocked DAPL to appease anti-pipeline rioters in North Dakota. But I doubt that this is what Skopic had in mind.
The bankers responsible for the 2008 crash were never prosecuted;
Did he run on prosecuting them? And presidents do not prosecute anyway. That's DOJ's job. The president can appoint the attorney general, but then there, Trump notwithstanding, should be a degree of independence.
card check never happened;
What's wrong with the secret ballot?
I think he did run on it, but of course, it's not as easy to actually unravel Gitmo as it is to promise it on campaign trail.
the bullets and bombs to Israel flowed unabated,
The weapons also flowed to Hamas, Hezbollah et al unabated, mostly from Iran. So why should not Israel get the weapons needed to defend itself from these terrorists?
and the Obama volunteer force was quietly dismantled, never to be used again.
Seems like a tactical mistake. Why exactly was that?
This is the greatest risk for Mamdani: not that New York’s financial and political elite will defeat him, but that they’ll seduce him to their way of thinking, and slowly, by degrees, make him just another normal Democrat.
Oh, the horror!
That in time, he may betray his supporters and himself. The offer would be presented subtly, in the name of “compromise” and “bipartisanship” and “trade-offs.”
People like Skopic see compromise as a dirty word, and pretend that in the real world there are not real trade-offs.
He needn't have worried. Mamdani is not interested in compromise - he is going full steam ahead with idiotic policies like freezing rents.
Along with Obama, the transformation of John Fetterman from jovial champion of organized labor to sadistic war-crime cheerleader comes to mind.
Wrong. Avila Chevalier and her Ilk are the war-crime cheerleaders. She led that cheer at the pro-Hamas rally in NYC on 10/8/2023 for example. And this is the kind of thing she cheered:
‘Please look at me’: ex-hostage confronts UN official over silence on Hamas sexual violence
Even AOC allowed herself to be taken in by the Biden-Harris administration, and to be made the mouthpiece for their lies about “working tirelessly for a ceasefire.”
Now not even AOC is extreme enough for the DSA. Of course, their idea of "ceasefire" is for Hamas to murder and abduct Israelis with impunity, but for Israel to not defend itself and go after Hamas. After all, their calls for "ceasefire now" came before the bodies of 10/7 victims were cold.
More from that article. I don't think lpetrich's excerpts quite capture the extremism of the author:
Alex Skopic (via me) said:
In his effort to get elected, Mamdani has
softened his language about the police considerably, from
saying that “There is no negotiating with an institution this wicked & corrupt” in 2020 to
saying that “I will work with the police because I believe the police have a critical role to play in creating public safety” in 2025. He was right the first time.
So he is categorically anti-police, and even Mamdani is not extreme enough on things like policing, globalizing the Intifada or hating billionaires to his liking. What a soyjak!