• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Early Life and Exolife (split from Exoplanet Stuff)

As to how the full length of electron-transport metabolism evolved,  Denitrifying bacteria may offer a clue.

They reduce nitrate, nitrite, and nitrogen oxides (collectively NOx) to nitrogen, using them as electron acceptors. "The majority of denitrifying bacteria are facultative aerobic heterotrophs that switch from aerobic respiration to denitrification when oxygen as an available terminal electron acceptor (TEA) runs out. This forces the organism to use nitrate to be used as a TEA."

Was nitric oxide the first deep electron sink? - ScienceDirect also at Was nitric oxide the first deep electron sink? - Ducluzeau2008.pdf
Evolutionary histories of enzymes involved in chemiosmotic energy conversion indicate that a strongly oxidizing substrate was available to the last universal common ancestor before the divergence of Bacteria and Archaea. According to palaeogeochemical evidence, O2 was not present beyond trace amounts on the early Earth. Based on recent phylogenetic, enzymatic and geochemical results, we propose that, in the earliest Archaean, nitric oxide (NO) and its derivatives nitrate and nitrite served as strongly oxidizing substrates driving the evolution of a bioenergetic pathway related to modern dissimilatory denitrification. Aerobic respiration emerged later from within this ancestral pathway via adaptation of the enzyme NO reductase to its new substrate, dioxygen.
So the LUCA likely used NOx as an electron acceptor, releasing N2 or less-oxygen NOx.
 
How did LUCA make a living? Chemiosmosis in the origin of life - 188.pdf
Despite thermodynamic, bioenergetic and phylogenetic failings, the 81-year-old concept of primordial soup remains central to mainstream thinking on the origin of life. But soup is homogeneous in pH and redox potential, and so has no capacity for energy coupling by chemiosmosis. Thermodynamic constraints make chemiosmosis strictly necessary for carbon and energy metabolism in all free-living chemotrophs, and presumably the first free-living cells too. Proton gradients form naturally at alkaline hydrothermal vents and are viewed as central to the origin of life. Here we consider how the earliest cells might have harnessed a geochemically created proton-motive force and then learned to make their own, a transition that was necessary for their escape from the vents. Synthesis of ATP by chemiosmosis today involves generation of an ion gradient by means of vectorial electron transfer from a donor to an acceptor. We argue that the first donor was hydrogen and the first acceptor CO2.

"Introduction: primordial soup at 81, well past its sell-by date"

:D

Then mentioned JBS Haldane's classic conception of a primordial soup, with more and more complicated molecules emerging, with the first organisms being fermenters of this soup, until they invented photosynthesis. He stated that

"Regarding the nature of that replicator, there is currently no viable alternative to the idea that some kind of ‘RNA world’ existed, that is, there was a time before proteins and DNA, when RNA was the molecular basis of both catalysis and replication."

He then criticized what he called the "RNA first" hypothesis, noting that many enzymes use metal ions and that some enzymes have iron-sulfur clusters in them. This suggests some early environment that was rich in metal ions and iron-sulfur clusters. The open ocean does not fit very well, though hydrothermal vents do. He also noted difficulties with prebiotic synthesis of RNA. Prebiotic-synthesis experiments can make lots of small amino acids, but it's much harder to make RNA nucleotides. One also finds lots of small amino acids in some meteorites, but no RNA in them.
 
"Fermentation is not ‘life without oxygen’"

The notion that the first organisms were fermenters is one that has been around for a long time. But the authors then point out problems with it. Fermentation is chemically complicated rearrangement, requiring several enzymes for reactions that do not have much energy return.

The authors state that no early branchers are "pure" fermenters, that they get their energy from electron-transfer reactions and chemiosmotic proton pumping. They also state that about every known autotroph, though I must note that photosynthesizers capture light energy and feed it into these reactions. Most heterotrophs also use electron transfer and chemiosmosis for much of their energy metabolism, and most fermenters retain at least some chemiosmotic capability, to pump molecules in and out of the cell, and to operate flagella.

"Perhaps most strikingly of all, bacteria and archaea differ markedly in the gene sequences and crystal structures of enzymes that catalyse the individual steps of fermentation."

Meaning at least two origins of fermentation well after the LUCA.

But if not fermentation, then what was the original source of energy?

"Alkaline hydrothermal vents as the primordial source of energy for life"

The discovery of black-smoker hydrothermal vents seemed to offer a solution. But they are hot (350 C) and acidic (pH 1 - 2), making them very bad environments.

Then around 2000, alkaline hydrothermal vents were discovered. They involve water flowing through rocks, like the black smokers, but away from volcanic activity. Water reacts with olivine in rocks, at temperatures of 150 - 200 C, making a mineral called serpentine, and releasing hydrogen. When this hydrogenated water reaches the surface, it is moderately hot (70 C) and very alkaline (pH 9 - 11).

"During the early phases of Earth’s history, >3.8 Gya ago, when life began and CO2 concentrations in the oceans were 1,000-fold higher than they are today, alkaline vents were the site of a redox interface between H2-rich hydrothermal and CO2-rich marine aqueous phases."

Disequilibrium. What an organism needs to metabolize and grow and reproduce.
 
"The origin of life in alkaline vents"

Describes how methanogenesis and acetogenesis involves electron transfer from H2 to CO2:
CO2 + 4H2 -> CH4 + 2H2O
2CO2 + 4H2 -> CH3COOH + 2H2O

They then mention that acetyl-CoA is a "thioester":

Ester: R1-COOH + HO-R2 -> R1-CO-O-R2 + H2O
Thioester: R1-COOH + HS-R2 -> R1-CO-S-R2 + H2O
(sulfur taking the place of oxygen)

"Further, ‘high-energy’ thioester bonds are easily converted into the phosphate bonds of ATP in modern biochemistry, powering intermediary metabolism."

So early metabolism may have involved a lot of thioesters.

Hydrothermal vents can make not only hydrogen, but also ammonia and simple amino acids and long-chain hydrocarbons. "However, no one has yet demonstrated the abiotic synthesis of nucleotide bases under hydrothermal vent conditions, even though FeS will efficiently catalyse the synthesis of purines and pyrimidines from formamide in the laboratory, ..."

Catalysts can decide which chemical-reaction products win, from what is produced the fastest and what is the most stable.

Finally, the surrounding ocean would have been much more acidic than the vent fluids, thus creating a pH gradient, just like what is involved in chemiosmosis.
 
"Chemiosmosis is fundamental and universal"

 Peter D. Mitchell proposed  Chemiosmosis in 1961, but it was not accepted for some years afterward. His colleagues kept searching for some chemical intermediate between electron-transfer and ATP-synthesis metabolism, but they did not find any. His hypothesis was controversial for a long time, resulting in the "ox-phos wars" (short for oxidative phosphorylation). But they eventually discovered what he had proposed, and in 1978, he won the Nobel Chemistry Prize.

Chemiosmosis and electron transfer are shared across Bacteria and Archaea, and thus by the LUCA. Rotor-stator ATP-synthase complexes with some subunit proteins shared, and ferredoxins, quinones, and cytochromes for electron transfer.

But Bacteria and Archaea vary in cell-membrane lipids and in cell walls, and it's hard to go from one kind to the other.

"The primordial proton-motive force"

"We therefore argue that the ancestral ATPase arose in alkaline vents, where it harnessed the natural proton gradients to generate ATP, just as it does today. It is worth noting here that we do not envisage the ancestral ATPase as embedded in the inorganic walls, but rather in organic lipids lining the walls."

Meaning that the earliest organisms were embedded in alkaline-vent deposits.

"Why chemiosmosis was necessary"

So that source reactions and ATP syntheses need not be matching.

Why might organisms have their own membrane pumps if they already live in pH gradients? To have a more reliable source of membrane gradient, since external gradients can vary.

"Conclusions"

"We have not attempted in this essay to plot out exactly what happened at the origin of life, but rather to focus attention on the importance of chemiosmosis as an early bioenergetic process, specifically in the setting of alkaline hydrothermal vents."

"Far from being too complex to have powered early life, it is actually nearly impossible to see how life could have begun in the absence of proton gradients, provided for ‘free’ as the natural result of a global geochemical process."
 
Mod note: I've moved all these early-life and exolife posts out of Exoplanet Stuff

I've kept the exolife posts with the early-life ones, because IMO the issue of early life is relevant to working out what biotas might exist elsewhere. For instance, several lines of evidence are consistent with origin in a hydrothermal vent, and this hypothesis helps us look for possible origin sites elsewhere.
 
Nitrogen fixation is very widespread and it is likely ancestral. It is essentially
N2 + 6e + 6H+ -> 2NH3

with the resulting ammonia being a raw material for biosynthesis.

Microorganisms | Free Full-Text | Phylogeny of Nitrogenase Structural and Assembly Components Reveals New Insights into the Origin and Distribution of Nitrogen Fixation across Bacteria and Archaea | HTML
  • Bacteria:
    • Terrabacteria: Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, Cyanobacteria, Firmicutes,
    • Gracilicutes: FCB (Bacteroidetes, Chlorobi), Proteobacteria (w/ Deferribacteres, Nitrospira), PVC (Planctobacteria), Spirochaetes
    • Aquificae, Fusobacteria
  • Archaea: Euryarchaeota (methanogens in it)
The authors propose that nitrogen fixing did not go back to the LUCA but was instead invented by some early methanogen. It then spread across Bacteria by lateral gene transfer.
 
Nitrogenase Inhibition Limited Oxygenation of Earth’s Proterozoic Atmosphere - ScienceDirect
Photosynthesis in cyanobacteria introduced oxygen into Earth’s atmosphere, giving the Great Oxidation Event, about 2.4 billion years ago. Atmospheric oxygen concentration then remained puzzlingly low, at most only 10% of its present value, for nearly 2 billion years.

Nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria that lack protection against oxygen cease to grow when oxygen reaches 10% of its present atmospheric level, the oxygen threshold for nitrogenase inhibition.

In the Proterozoic ‘boring billion’, oxygen inhibited nitrogen fixation, cell growth, and photosynthesis on a global scale, suppressing any further rise in atmospheric oxygen until the arrival of land plants about 450 million years ago.

Land plants separate aerial photosynthesis from nitrogen fixation in soil.
The "Boring Billion" is from roughly 1.9 to 1.0 billion years ago, in the early to middle Proterozoic.

Present-day cyanobacteria can protect their nitrogen fixation by differentiating into "heterocysts", but that ability is only about 400 million years old, long after cyanobacteria themselves originated.
The Late Arrival of the Heterocyst

Nitrogen fixation is inhibited by molecular oxygen and cyanobacteria have evolved several mechanisms to deal with this inhibition 73, 74. In some filamentous cyanobacteria, heterocysts are specialised nitrogen-fixing cells 43, 75 that have no oxygen-evolving photosystem II. Heterocysts fix nitrogen using ATP from photosystem I cyclic photophosphorylation together with electrons from substrates imported from neighbouring vegetative cells 43, 75, 76, 77. Heterocysts therefore permit cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation under aerobic conditions. Some cyanobacteria without heterocysts can fix nitrogen, but do so only in darkness, temporally separating nitrogen fixation from photosynthesis 78, 79, or under low oxygen conditions 64, 65, 71, often using sulphide instead of water as the inorganic electron donor 68, 71. Yet other cyanobacteria without heterocysts can fix nitrogen, but do so only at low oxygen partial pressures 32, 55, 57, 58, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67 because they have not evolved special O2 protection mechanisms. Non-nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria obtain nitrogen from ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, or urea [80], and control photosystem stoichiometry to match these substrates’ differing requirements for ATP relative to electrons from reduced ferredoxin 81, 82.

Cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation is ancient [83] (Figure 4). Nevertheless, fossil heterocysts have not been seen in rocks predating the Devonian period [72]. The cyanobacterial lineages that today possess heterocysts also possess spore-like structures termed akinetes 84, 85. Though fossil akinetes have a record that extends into the Proterozoic 85, 86, heterocysts themselves are lacking in the otherwise well-documented Precambrian cyanobacterial fossil record 11, 85, 86, 87. The oldest uncontroversial fossil heterocysts trace to land ecosystems of the Rhynie chert [84], a mere 408 MY old [88]. A Devonian origin of heterocysts (Figure 4) suggests that they arose as cells dedicated to protection of nitrogen fixation from an oxygenated atmosphere and in response to late (Figure 1) oxygen accumulation.

Cyanobacteria have evolved mechanisms besides heterocysts to avoid nitrogenase inhibition by oxygen 43, 50, including N2 fixation in the dark [89], or filament bundles, as in Trichodesmium 55, 58, 90. Critics might counter that such mechanisms could have bypassed O2 feedback inhibition during the Proterozoic. There are, however, two problems with this objection. First, the mechanisms that cyanobacteria use to deal with modern O2 levels appear in phylogenies to have arisen independently in diverse lineages (Figure 4), not at the base of cyanobacterial evolution when water oxidation had first emerged 50, 91. Second, despite cyanobacteria having a fossil record that extends into the Archaean [92], there is no palaeontological trace of Proterozoic heterocysts 93, 94. The oldest uncontroversial fossil heterocysts are merely Devonian in age [84], younger than the first land plants and contemporary with the late atmospheric O2 increase (Figure 1). We propose that filamentous cyanobacterial lineages are ancient, while their heterocysts are not, and that heterocysts emerged to protect nitrogenase from the high atmospheric levels of oxygen generated by land plants. Indeed, a recent phylogenomic investigation of trait evolution in cyanobacteria also indicates that heterocysts arose late in cyanobacterial evolution [95].
This has implications for exobiology.

This constraint on oxygen production comes from the chemistry of nitrogen fixation, and it means that other planets may also have low oxygen concentrations in their atmospheres and oceans.
 
Geobiological feedbacks, oxygen, and the evolution of nitrogenase - ScienceDirect
Biological nitrogen fixation via the activity of nitrogenase is one of the most important biological innovations, allowing for an increase in global productivity that eventually permitted the emergence of higher forms of life. The complex metalloenzyme termed nitrogenase contains complex iron-sulfur cofactors. Three versions of nitrogenase exist that differ mainly by the presence or absence of a heterometal at the active site metal cluster (either Mo or V). Mo-dependent nitrogenase is the most common while V-dependent or heterometal independent (Fe-only) versions are often termed alternative nitrogenases since they have apparent lower activities for N2 reduction and are expressed in the absence of Mo. Phylogenetic data indicates that biological nitrogen fixation emerged in an anaerobic, thermophilic ancestor of hydrogenotrophic methanogens and later diversified via lateral gene transfer into anaerobic bacteria, and eventually aerobic bacteria including Cyanobacteria. Isotopic evidence suggests that nitrogenase activity existed at 3.2 Ga, prior to the advent of oxygenic photosynthesis and rise of oxygen in the atmosphere, implying the presence of favorable environmental conditions for oxygen-sensitive nitrogenase to evolve. Following the proliferation of oxygenic phototrophs, diazotrophic organisms had to develop strategies to protect nitrogenase from oxygen inactivation and generate the right balance of low potential reducing equivalents and cellular energy for growth and nitrogen fixation activity. Here we review the fundamental advances in our understanding of biological nitrogen fixation in the context of the emergence, evolution, and taxonomic distribution of nitrogenase, with an emphasis placed on key events associated with its emergence and diversification from anoxic to oxic environments.
So nitrogen fixing spread before production of O2.
 
Here's something odd: arsenic metabolism. Arsenic is well-known for its toxicity, and that is because it imitates phosphorus. But organisms that tolerate it keep it out of their cell interiors, and some organisms metabolize it.

In particular, they do arsenite <-> arsenate
Arsenite ion: AsO3---
Arsenate ion: AsO4---

Arsenite + H2O <-> Arsenate + 2e + 2H+

Arsenite Oxidase, an Ancient Bioenergetic Enzyme | Molecular Biology and Evolution | Oxford Academic
Arsenite oxidase (Aro) oxidizes arsenite to arsenate, thus making it an electron donor for electron-transfer metabolism.

Versions of Aro were found in a variety of organisms by looking for sequences similar to known ones in sequenced genomes. Some 1000 prokaryote genomes have now been sequenced, meaning that all one has to do is crunch a lot of numbers.

Everywhere that Aro is found, it is transported to the outside of the cell membrane and attached to an electron-transfer protein complex.

"The obtained phylogenetic trees indicate an early origin of arsenite oxidase before the divergence of Archaea and Bacteria." Meaning that the LUCA could use arsenite as an electron donor.

Enzyme phylogenies as markers for the oxidation state of the environment: The case of respiratory arsenate reductase and related enzymes | BMC Ecology and Evolution | Full Text

Considers arsenate reductase (Arr), which reduces arsenate to arsenite, thus making it an electron acceptor for electron-transfer metabolism.

Here also, sequences similar to known Arr sequences were found by searching sequenced genomes.

Aro and Arr turned out to be only distantly related. Also, "On the Arr subtree, (δ-, ε- and γ-) proteobacterial sequences are intermingled with those from Firmicutes and Clostridia. Even the various proteobacterial lineages do not cluster together and δ-, ε- and γ-proteobacterial representatives seem almost erratically scattered over this subtree. Despite specific effort to this end, we were unable to find any archaeal members of this family." So Arr originated in Bacteria and then spread by lateral gene transfer. It was likely as a response to increasing environmental oxidation by cyanobacteria releasing oxygen and oxidizing arsenite to arsenate.
 
This is a group of small and metabolically-limited bacteria that has recently been discovered, bacteria sometimes called Patesibacteria or ultrasmall bacteria or nanobacteria. They typically lack several biosynthesis pathways, meaning that they are likely obligate fermentative symbionts, living in association with other organisms that fill in their gaps.

"Many of its characteristics are similar or analogous to those of ultra-small archaea ( DPANN)." They are small, metabolically limited, and mostly symbiotic.

The two form early-branching clades in their domains, and it is not clear whether they are a highest-level branch or one in a lower-level taxon.
  • For CPR: Bacteria > Terrabacteria: ( Cyanobacteria, ( (Firmicutes, Actinobacteria), (CPR Chloroflexi) ) )
  • For DPANN: Archaea > Euryarchaeota: ( various, (various, DPANN) )
 
DPANN: "They are known as nanoarchaea or ultra-small archaea due to their smaller size (nanometric) compared to other archaea." -- much like CFR.

Now to NOx metabolism.

The Relationship of Nitrate Reducing Bacteria on the Basis of narH Gene Sequences and Comparison of narH and 16S rDNA Based Phylogeny - ScienceDirect
Comparison of phylogenetic trees based on 16S rDNA sequences with those based on narH sequences revealed highly similar relationships of both genes from most of the bacteria analysed. Since highly conserved functional cysteine clusters within bacterial and archaeal narH sequences support a linear evolution from one common progenitor a long evolutionary history of the respiratory membrane-bound nitrate reductase can be inferred from our phylogenetic data.
So this enzyme dates back to the LUCA.

It does NO3- + 2H+ + 2e -> NO2- + H2O
 
Phylogenetic Analysis of Nitrite, Nitric Oxide, and Nitrous Oxide Respiratory Enzymes Reveal a Complex Evolutionary History for Denitrification | Molecular Biology and Evolution | Oxford Academic

What they do:

Nitrate reductase: nar
NO3- + 2H+ + 2e -> NO2- + H2O

Nitrite reductase: nir
NO2- + 2H+ + 3e -> NO + H2O

Nitric oxide reductase: nor
2NO + 2H+ + 2e -> N2O + H2O

Nitrous oxide reductase: nos
N2O + 2H+ + 2e -> N2 + H2O

Highly diverse nirK genes comprise two major clades that harbour ammonium-producing denitrifiers | BMC Genomics | Full Text
That enzyme is a copper-containing nitrite reductase.

There exist two different kinds of nirK enzymes. The first of them is found mostly in alpha-proteobacteria, with some beta and gamma proteo's. The second is found broadly across Bacteria and even in Archaea.

Looking at the MB&E paper, it seems that the NO2-, NO, and N2 reductases are best represented in the proteobacteria, with some lateral gene transfer to other Bacteria and to Archaea. That may be an artifact of how they searched for possible homologues, however.
 
The ineluctable requirement for the trans-iron elements molybdenum and/or tungsten in the origin of life | Scientific Reports
An evolutionary tree of key enzymes from the Complex-Iron-Sulfur-Molybdoenzyme (CISM) superfamily distinguishes “ancient” members, i.e. enzymes present already in the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) of prokaryotes, from more recently evolved subfamilies. The majority of the presented subfamilies and, as a consequence, the Molybdo-enzyme superfamily as a whole, appear to have existed in LUCA. The results are discussed with respect to the nature of bioenergetic substrates available to early life and to problems arising from the low solubility of molybdenum under conditions of the primordial Earth.

A vast number of enzymes rely on metal cofactors for catalysis and/or redox conversions. Different types of such “metalloenzymes” appear to have evolutionary roots which reach more or less deeply into the distant past of life on Earth. The varying depths of evolutionary pedigrees likely reflect constraints imposed by paleogeochemistry such as abundances and solubilities of metals in specific environments and eons of our planet's history. Iron-sulphur cluster-containing ferredoxins, for example, probably go back to the very origin of life. Copper enzymes, by contrast, are argued to have emerged only after the oxygenation of the environment some 2.5 billion years ago due to its insolubility under anaerobic conditions.

...
The clades representing DMSO/TMAO reductase (Dms/Dor/Tor) and arsenate reductase (Arr) contain only Bacteria and furthermore strongly diverge from 16S rRNA-based species trees. They therefore likely are late-emerging enzymes distributed predominantly via horizontal gene transfer. The clades corresponding to formate dehydrogenase (Fdh), polysulfide reductase (Psr), arsenite oxidase (Aro) and nitrate reductase (Nar) by and large resemble species trees, feature a prominent Archaea/Bacteria cleavage and their roots fall in between the archaeal and bacterial subtrees. The combined occurrence of these features strongly suggests the enzymes making up these clades to have been present in LUCA. The structural unit of the CISM protein thus appears to have served multiple purposes for life, especially in energy harvesting, right from its very beginnings.

  • [*}DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide
  • TMAO = trimethylamine oxide
Seems like both DMSO and TMAO are relatively recent. But we can infer that the LUCA could do:
  • Formic acid decomposition: HCOOH -> CO2 + H2
  • Nitrate reduction to nitrite: NO3- + 2H+ + 2e -> NO2- + H2O
  • Arsenite oxidation to arsenate (As = arsenic): AsO3--- + H2O -> AsO4--- + 2H+ + 2e
  • Polysulfide reductase: S + 2H+ + 2e -> H2S

Arsenics as bioenergetic substrates - ScienceDirect

Insight into the evolution of the iron oxidation pathways - ScienceDirect
That's Fe++ -> Fe+++ + e. It likely dates back to the LUCA.
 
On the universal core of bioenergetics - ScienceDirect
"Whereas a wide variety of redox substrates is exploited by prokaryotes resulting in very diverse layouts of electron transfer chains, the ensemble of molecular architectures of enzymes and redox cofactors employed to construct these systems is stunningly small and uniform."
Numerous enzyme phylogenies have been reconstructed over the course of the last decade. The vast majority of these phylogenies agree on the observation that Cu-containing enzymes appear comparatively late in evolutionary history (for discussions, see [60], [80]) and most likely not before the accumulation of O2 in the environment. For the case of Cu, results from molecular phylogeny are thus by and large in agreement with palaeogeochemical reasoning as mentioned in Section 7.1. The same isn't true with respect to molybdenum. Phylogenies of the Mo-pterin enzyme superfamily strongly support the presence of the enzyme in the LUCA. Palaeogeochemical rationalisations of this finding have been discussed in detail recently [70].

With respect to specific substrates, many enzymes corroborate the geochemical predictions outlined above. Potential terminal electron acceptors with moderately high redox potentials (see [131] for a detailed discussion of the case of arsenate) seem to have appeared in the biosphere only after the rise of oxygen, that is, substantially after the Archaea/Bacteria divergence. By contrast, certain enzymes converting H2 or CO2 indeed appear to have been part of the bioenergetic inventory of the LUCA [111], [127], [132]. Intriguingly, however, several specific enzymes catalysing reactions with high potential redox substrates or cofactors also look to have existed in the LUCA (see Section 4. and [60], [70], [133], [134]).
Meaning that there were some good oxidizer(s) back then, even if no O2. Nitrate, for instance.
As is obvious from Fig. 2, acetogenesis and methanogenesis from H2 and CO2 (and, even more so, from acetate and CO2) are indeed much worse off than any other bioenergetic system with respect to electrochemical energy availability in their substrate couples: “Acetogens clearly live at the thermodynamic limit of life” [37].

The abovementioned arguments together with the re-evaluation of the atmospheric composition on the primitive Earth (i.e. stipulating high pressures of CO2) and the recognition of seafloor hydrothermal vents (emanating high amounts of H2) as promising hatcheries for life have made the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway appear as the most promising candidate for the ancestor of all extant bioenergetic chains. This notion is bolstered by phylogenetic results on several enzymes involved in the pathway and most notably the molybdo/tungstopterin proteins performing the first step of reducing CO2 to the formyl-moiety and the [NiFe] hydrogenases furnishing reducing equivalents. The almost “inorganic” aspect of the catalytic sites of other enzymes in the pathway, such as CODH or [NiFe] hydrogenases, is also in line with great ancestry of this mechanism [136], [137].
With lots of H2 and CO2, the synthesis of methane and acetate will be pushed forward by thermodynamics, and that can fill in for not being as well-performing as present-day systems.

However,
Still, we feel that the ever-increasing number of predicted pre-LUCA, quinone-involving enzymes is alarming and requires consideration. These results clearly are at odds with a scenario envisaging minimal Wood–Ljungdahl pathways in the LUCA and a subsequent bifurcation into a methano- and an acetogenic version in Archaea and Bacteria, respectively.
A LUCA quinone system would be used for energy metabolism outside of W-L, like nitrate reduction.
 
Evolutionary Persistence of the Molybdopyranopterin-Containing Sulfite Oxidase Protein Fold | Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
Sulfite oxidase: makes sulfate:
SO3-- + H2O -> SO4-- + 2H+ + 2e

The metabolic network of the last bacterial common ancestor | Communications Biology
In accordance with recent findings for LUCA and LACA, analyses of thousands of individual gene trees indicate that LBCA was rod-shaped and the first lineage to diverge from the ancestral bacterial stem was most similar to modern Clostridia, followed by other autotrophs that harbor the acetyl-CoA pathway.

...
Based on the universality of the genetic code, amino acid chirality, and universal metabolic currencies, there is an agreement that a last universal common ancestor (LUCA) predated the divergence of bacteria and archaea. Because the bacterial and archaeal domains are monophyletic, there is evidence for one clear ancestor for each domain—the last bacterial common ancestor (LBCA) and the last archaeal common ancestor (LACA). Phylogenomic reconstructions indicate that LUCA was a thermophilic anaerobe that lived from gasses in a hydrothermal setting7, notwithstanding contrasting views8,9. Both phylogenomics and geological evidence indicate that LACA was a methanogen10,11,12, or a similar anaerobic autotroph that fixed carbon via the Wood–Ljungdahl (also known as acetyl-CoA) pathway12. Reconstructing the habitat and lifestyle of LBCA is, however, impaired by lateral gene transfer (LGT)13, which decouples physiological evolution from ribosomal phylogeny.

...
In other words, the fundamentals of biochemistry, metabolism, and physiology were invented in a time when the Earth was anoxic.
Both the LBCA and the LACA were likely autotrophs, and likely also the LUCA.

"By investigating the genomes of anaerobic bacteria, we were able to obtain inferences about the metabolism and physiology of LBCA. Our results indicate that LBCA was autotrophic, gluconeogenetic, and rod-shaped."

gluconeogenetic = glucose-making
 
Evolution of Reverse Gyrase Suggests a Nonhyperthermophilic Last Universal Common Ancestor | Molecular Biology and Evolution | Oxford Academic
Reverse gyrase (RG) is the only protein found ubiquitously in hyperthermophilic organisms, but absent from mesophiles. As such, its simple presence or absence allows us to deduce information about the optimal growth temperature of long-extinct organisms, even as far as the last universal common ancestor of extant life (LUCA). The growth environment and gene content of the LUCA has long been a source of debate in which RG often features. In an attempt to settle this debate, we carried out an exhaustive search for RG proteins, generating the largest RG data set to date. Comprising 376 sequences, our data set allows for phylogenetic reconstructions of RG with unprecedented size and detail. These RG phylogenies are strikingly different from those of universal proteins inferred to be present in the LUCA, even when using the same set of species. Unlike such proteins, RG does not form monophyletic archaeal and bacterial clades, suggesting RG emergence after the formation of these domains, and/or significant horizontal gene transfer. Additionally, the branch lengths separating archaeal and bacterial groups are very short, inconsistent with the tempo of evolution from the time of the LUCA. Despite this, phylogenies limited to archaeal RG resolve most archaeal phyla, suggesting predominantly vertical evolution since the time of the last archaeal ancestor. In contrast, bacterial RG indicates emergence after the last bacterial ancestor followed by significant horizontal transfer. Taken together, these results suggest a nonhyperthermophilic LUCA and bacterial ancestor, with hyperthermophily emerging early in the evolution of the archaeal and bacterial domains.
What did they count as being a hyperthermophile as opposed to a plain thermophile?
We were able to obtain information on the optimum growth temperatures of 174 of the 247 species encoding RG. As observed previously, almost all organisms encoding RG are hyperthermophiles or extreme-thermophiles, with 60% of the species in our data set having an optimum growth temperature above 75 °C and 89% above 65 °C. Although difficult to confirm, we believe this data set includes all hyperthermophilic organisms for which genome sequences are available. Thus, our data reaffirm the previous observation that RG is encoded by the genomes of all hyperthermophiles (Forterre 2002a). In addition to extreme-thermophiles, our search also gave hits to RG sequences in five moderate thermophiles with optimum growth temperatures below 65 °C: Thermodesulfovibrio aggregans (60 °C; Sekiguchi et al. 2008); Nitratiruptor tergarcus (55 °C; Nakagawa et al. 2005); Lebetimonas natsushimae (55 °C; Nagata et al. 2017); Caminibacter mediatlanticus (55 °C; Voordeckers et al. 2005); Nautilia profundicola (40 °C; Smith et al. 2008). The presence of RG in N. profundicola has been described previously and is likely an adaptation to short-term exposure to elevated temperatures in hydrothermal vent environments, with RG expression increasing 100-fold during temperature stress at 65 °C (Campbell et al. 2009). As Ni. tergarcus, L. natsushimae, and C. mediatlanticus were also isolated from the walls of active hydrothermal vents, similar adaptive mechanisms may explain the presence of RG in these species.
 
Reverse gyrase seems essential for surviving very high temperatures, above 60 - 75 C. So its absence suggests that the LUCA was only a moderate thermophile. That means that it must have originated in the cooler parts of some hydrothermal-vent system, and that its descendants later spread to the hotter parts -- and ended up exchanging genes for RG to tolerate the heat.

The authors consider the possibility that the LUCA had some alternative, but it must have been an alternative that got replaced in every case by RG.
For example, work on ancestral protein and rRNA reconstructions (Galtier et al. 1999; Boussau et al. 2008; Groussin and Gouy 2011) suggest that the LUCA was either a mesophile or a moderate thermophile. Additionally, thermoadaptations observed in membrane lipids (Langworthy and Pond 1986; Wiegel and Michael 2014) and modifications of tRNA (Edmonds et al. 1991; Lorenz et al. 2017) are nonhomologous between bacteria and archaea, suggesting hyperthermophily evolved independently in each lineage rather than being a shared trait from the LUCA. A nonhyperthermophilic LUCA is also in agreement with the idea that LUCA was an organism simpler than modern ones, with smaller ribosomes (Fox 2010) and possibly an RNA genome (Poole and Logan 2005). Indeed, the origin of most DNA replication proteins cannot be traced back to LUCA (Forterre 2002b,, 2013), and it seems that RG is not an exception. The transition from a LUCA with an RNA genome to archaea and bacteria with DNA genomes could also explain why the tempo of evolution drastically slowed between LUCA and the two prokaryotic ancestors, considering that DNA can be replicated and repaired much more faithfully than RNA (Forterre 2006). With respect to our RG phylogenies, and RG evolution in general, the short branch lengths between bacterial and archaeal clades would place the emergence of RG in the age of DNA cells, that is, more recently than the time of a rapidly evolving RNA-based LUCA (and post-LUCA lineage). This, perhaps, would seem logical considering the strict DNA substrate-dependence of RG, and RG conferring adaptation to hyperthermophilic growth temperatures—a state likely incompatible with RNA genomes (Ginoza and Zimm 1961). Finally, our work highlights the fact that a widespread distribution across bacterial and archaeal taxa is not sufficient evidence for inferring the presence of a protein in the LUCA. Rather, a clear, well-separated monophyly of Archaea and Bacteria, and deep congruence with canonical phylogenetic relationships should be demonstrated (e.g., those exemplified by RNA polymerase, EF-G, 16S rRNA etc.).
Wikipedia's definitions:
 Hyperthermophile60 C up
 Thermophile40 C up
 Mesophile20 C to 45 C
 Psychophile / cryophile-20 C to 10 C
Many hyperthermophiles tolerate temperatures greater than 80 C, and some greater than 100 C, though at ocean-floor pressures that suppress boiling. The champion is  Strain 121 (Geogemma barossii, found in a hydrothermal vent) It can reproduce at 121 C, and it can survive at 130 C without reproducing.
 
Integrative modeling of gene and genome evolution roots the archaeal tree of life | PNAS

They find (DPANN, (Euryarchaeota, (TACK, Lokiarchaeota)))

TACK ~ Proteoarchaeota

(DPANN, other Archaea), much like (CPR, other Bacteria)

"Our analyses (Fig. 4) suggest that the LACA was an anaerobe that may have been able to fix CO2 to acetyl-CoA via the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway and to subsequently generate acetate and ATP using an acetyl-CoA synthetase (arCOG01340) (SI Appendix)"

"Our analysis also suggests that the LACA had most of the modern archaeal transcription, translation, and DNA replication machineries, components of the exosome and proteasome, a secretion system, and some of the key genes for synthesizing archaeal ether lipids (SI Appendix, Figs. S16 and S17 and Table S6)."

Proteasome: a structure for recycling proteins. It contains proteases, enzymes that cut proteins up into their component amino acids. Proteins are tagged for recycling with a protein called ubiquitin.

Exosomes are released blobs of material from inside a cell.

"Aerobic metabolisms evolved later and independently in several different archaeal lineages, perhaps associated with the rise in atmospheric oxygen that began 2.5–2.3 Gya (82)"

"Moving beyond the LACA, our analyses suggest that the Euryarchaeota/TACK common ancestor was also an anaerobe, possessing enzymes including superoxide reductase/desulfoferredoxin (pfam01880) commonly found in modern anaerobic and microaerophilic organisms. This ancestor also might have possessed an anaerobic proton-pumping system comprising membrane-bound F420- and/or H2-dependent hydrogenases."
Our analyses indicate that oxidative phosphorylation as attested by terminal oxidases and NADH dehydrogenase appears to have been acquired independently in several descendent lineages, including the TACK Archaea after their divergence from Lokiarchaeum and the stem leading to the Haloarchaeota (81). It is tempting to speculate that these parallel acquisitions of oxidative metabolisms may have been associated with the rise in atmospheric oxygen beginning around 2.5–2.3 billion y ago (82). Some of the genes today involved in sulfur metabolism also appeared first in the Euryarchaeota/TACK ancestor, including a potential sulfhydrogenase. Others, particularly genes for sulfur reduction, appear to have originated independently along the stems leading to different crenarchaeotal and euryarchaeotal lineages.
 
What temperatures did the ancestral Archaea like?
The LACA and the last common ancestors of each of the major archaeal clades (DPANN, Euryarchaeota+TACK/Lokiarchaeum, Euryarchaeota, and TACK+Lokiarchaeum) were all inferred to be thermophiles, and these inferences were robust to the inclusion of DPANN in the analysis (SI Appendix, Table S7); the median optimal growth temperature estimate for the LACA was 73.1 °C in the full analysis, and 75.7 °C in the analysis without DPANN. Interestingly, our model predicts mesophilic optimal growth temperatures for most modern DPANN genomes, consistent with the idea (84, 85)⁠ that adaptation to mesophily from a thermophilic ancestor occurred independently in each of the major archaeal clades.
"Our analyses suggest that there has been an ongoing increase in gene content throughout archaeal history, from ∼1,090 genes in the common ancestor to 537–5,359 (mean, 1,686.4) genes among modern lineages."

Our reconciliations suggest that archaeal gene family evolution has been largely vertical (see also ref. 26), because for the majority (15,623) of gene families, vertical transmission events outnumber horizontal transfers [transfer ratio (TR) <0.5] (Materials and Methods). Interestingly, the distribution of TRs is multimodal, with a small peak of genes at TR >0.5 (SI Appendix, Fig. S19). In agreement with previous work on the transferability of genes with different kinds of functions (90), functional category had a significant effect on TR (P = 7.26 × 10^−134, ANOVA), with genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism (COG category G; P = 2.5 × 10−10, Fisher's exact test) and defense functions (COG category V) enriched in the set of frequently transferred genes with TR >0.5 (P = 6.7 × 10^−12, Fisher's exact test).
So there wasn't a lot of horizontal gene transfer in Archaea, though some genes jumped around quite a lot. This should make us confident in Archaea phylogenies.
The two stem lineages in which we observe the greatest number of gene acquisitions are the branches leading to the Haloarchaea and the Thaumarchaeota, two lineages that have undergone significant ecological transitions. Haloarchaea are suggested to have evolved into oxygen-respiring, light-harvesting heterotrophs from a methanogenic ancestor (81), whereas Thaumarchaeota may have evolved an ammonia-oxidizing lifestyle from an anaerobic ancestor (94). Horizontal transfer of metabolic genes from Bacteria has been implicated as an important process in these transitions (94⇓–96), although the number of inferred transfers is sensitive to both the method used for mapping (26, 91, 94) and the taxonomic sampling of the lineages involved (97).
Haloarchaea include the likes of Halobacterium named for living in very salty environments:  Halophile They also collect light energy with a system separate from chlorophyll-using photosynthesis.
 
Back
Top Bottom