All? Citation needed. Here's one for you: Acceptance of evolution by religious groups. And that only refers to the benighted nation of the US.Yeah, but they are all skeptical about evolution and shit
Also
Interesting.
Do you have a similar chart but the question: how many evolutionists believe in a god?
I'm skeptical, but not a phony one like many around here.
When I see religion anywhere I point it out.
I have found "scientific religion" inside the branch of science, I did my research and found it.
As skeptical, I won't accept any sh*t scientists say unless is not properly reviewed thru the scientific method from the very beginning of their statements. Something which in science is a "must do" step.
And, even when you argue and argue the best you can, reality is that in base on the genesis of the theory of evolution, this theory was born with the fixed idea that species appeared worst, simple and inferior. For this reason, this theory was idealized to explain how it comes that today species are "better, more complex and superior".However, it was discovered later that no species is more complex, neither better and less superior than their ancestors. So, the theory itself was false.
Here you have a confrontation: or recognition of the falsehood of the theory or, invent that the theory always was about "change", and for this motive, the theory must be "updated".
As I reviewer of the scientific method, theories found false can't be updated but discarded. You can only update theories which are valid.
The theory of evolution was erroneous since its very beginning when Kant and Schopenhauer idealized that humans came from Orangutans and chimpanzees, And caricatures were made of a chimpanzee with Darwin head. This one was made in 1874.
People in those times were mocking of Darwin because even when Darwin didn't write about orangutans and chimpanzees as our ancestors, but his ideas came from those men, whom together with many others thought that the proper name for the theory was "evolution" because such is what for them such was the rule for the steps of the species: "natural selection ruled solely by favorable steps".
Rather than recognizing they were wrong, the leaders of the theory of evolution made their worst mistake when they "changed" the total essence of their theory into a more modern view, where "evolution" is no more a change with a meaning of development but just "change" regardless how.
From what was an error in science, the theory of evolution became a religion. Every biology student in universities must accept the doctrines of evolution, it is an imposition, no student is allowed to question evolution, no essays are admitted reasoning the invalidity of evolution, students -if they want to obtain the degree- must blinded accept the doctrines of evolution and defend them.
Question is, defending the theory of evolution from whom?
Is the theory of evolution "competing" with religion?
Why? So far, science and religion are two separate subjects, one is not related by the another.... unless religion becomes science or the theory of evolution becomes a religion.
As far as I know, as an skeptical, the theory of evolution is desperately competing with traditional religion because the theory of evolution is a new religion.
There are no facts that species are superior, more complex and better than their former ancestors. No facts about it. Even bacteria becomes "stronger" after antibiotics treatment has been exposed to be false in another topic in these forums, the whole thing about evolution is just a belief.
So, you might consider yourself as skeptical, but watch out! You must review the current theories of science which are also religions rather than scientific approach based on facts. Otherwise you are free of one religion to become a slave of another religion. Lol.