TomC
Bless Your Heart!
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2020
- Messages
- 11,236
- Location
- Midwestern USA
- Gender
- Faggot
- Basic Beliefs
- Agnostic deist
But you sure do claim so, like,
So, how would you know this?
There is zero evidence that Cornell HAS given an exemption to anyone.
It is reasonable to assume that at least one or two Cornell students have medical conditions that preclude receiving the vaccine but we don't KNOW this. Such data is not published nor would it be because students are entitled to have their medical information be private.
As for other reasons--we don't know. I would and have argued that Cornell makes a very good case for itself to NOT exempt anyone on the basis of past discrimination and harm based upon race.
So if they suppress the evidence they're not guilty. Sounds very Republican.
If Cornell ever does that, you'll have a point.
In the meantime, we've got your opinion about Republicans. Guilty people suppressing evidence sounds Republican. Sadly, I agree. The GOP wasn't like that for most of my life, but now it is.
I think it's unfortunate, but well demonstrated to be true.
Tom