Maslin says he was surprised to learn the candidates are given a list of questions they’ll be asked in advance.
“If you had to think of [answers] on the spot, it would be really hard. But because they already know the question, they’re going to have these well-crafted politicized answers that aren’t genuine,” he says, “I think [the debate] loses a piece of the honesty.”
Also, why are they given the questions in advance?
Were they given the questions in advance? I was discussing this with my SO last night, and I mentioned that from what I've read they often do know the questions before the debate. I wasn't sure in this case though. If they were that makes things pretty bad. Some of those people were seemingly caught looking flat footed by some of the questions, and given some lead time, one would think they'd have had better answers than "OMG MEDIA BIASES LUK OUTZ!"
assuming "attack the librul media" is not the proper response during a republican debate
assuming "attack the librul media" is not the proper response during a republican debate
Good point. They did have proper responses prepared.
The crazy thing is, if you're complaining about the questions and making a choice to not answer them and answer something else, why not shift to somethign substantive instead of something different unsubstantive? They had an opportunity to show leadership and how much better they were than their media. It really wouldn't have been hard. And they blew that, too.
Ted Cruz starting the attack on the liberal media is seen by republican primary voters as an example of great leadership.
Because attacking the libral media is well received by the lemmings. And the Repug candidates really don't want real substance either.assuming "attack the librul media" is not the proper response during a republican debate
Good point. They did have proper responses prepared.
The crazy thing is, if you're complaining about the questions and making a choice to not answer them and answer something else, why not shift to somethign substantive instead of something different unsubstantive? They had an opportunity to show leadership and how much better they were than their media. It really wouldn't have been hard. And they blew that, too.
For the largely Republican audience, loudly sympathetic to the White House wannabes, Harwood quickly assumed the role of biased lamestream media scoundrel by asking billionaire reality TV mogul Donald Trump, right out of the box: “Mr. Trump, you have done very well in this campaign so far by promising to build another wall and make another country pay for it, send 11 million people out of the country, cut taxes $10 trillion without increasing the deficit, and make Americans better off because your greatness will replace the stupidity and incompetence of others. Let’s be honest. Is this a comic book version of a presidential candidate?”
Ted Cruz starting the attack on the liberal media is seen by republican primary voters as an example of great leadership.
Which is sad and pathetic. And luckily the Republican primary voters are not a large enough block to win a general election.