Great Reset Coming Soon

[Swammerdami]

Autists often have trouble recognizing sarcasm. This was the most charitable explanation for your confusion.

 

[Jarhyn]

Autists often have trouble recognizing sarcasm. This was the most charitable explanation for your confusion.

I once saw an explanation comparing Autism to Schitzophrenic disorders, wherein Autism was described in terms of neural density.

Many autistic behaviors bear resemblance to what happens in an "artificial" neural network when you throw too many neurons at a problem: You end up getting these weird behaviors wherein the system will have just-so overcomplicated results that instead of targeting general solutions to problems will wind up producing answers only on the clear set.

As such it is generally the case that when a system has too many neurons in it, it will ONLY be correct with respect to the exact process or training set, and things outside that set will confuse it.

The best answer I can see to this is training someone early and carefully and well to be obsessed with creating accurate models that feature no junky bits and which operate in general ways: essentially philosophical rejection of memorization and rote learning.

 

[Swammerdami]

Interesting. I worked at a Comp Sci lab with machine learning a specialty, so was familiar with "over-training" and the related problem of over-large net. However I had never heard the idea applied to organic brains.

In some ways I am an idiot-savant, though much less exaggerated than the Dustin Hoffman character in Rain Man. The "idiot" may be much more apparent than the "savant."

 

[Jarhyn]

Interesting. I worked at a Comp Sci lab with machine learning a specialty, so was familiar with "over-training" and the related problem of over-large net. However I had never heard the idea applied to organic brains.

In some ways I am an idiot-savant, though much less exaggerated than the Dustin Hoffman character in Rain Man. The "idiot" may be much more apparent than the "savant."

See, now I just need to have that discussion with you about applying HTM-ANN training techniques to your own HTM-ONN.

As a bonus, there are some discussions you can find, if you pick through them with care, where people in antiquity already figured it out and wrote it down.

Sadly, finding that is like finding a slightly smaller sand colored piece of topaz in a sea of silica sand. On this side of history, you really need to already know what ANNs are and how they train, learn, and operate to really be able to pick out the ones who did actually "figure it out".

 

[SIB]

Autists often have trouble recognizing sarcasm. This was the most charitable explanation for your confusion.

I once saw an explanation comparing Autism to Schitzophrenic disorders, wherein Autism was described in terms of neural density.

Many autistic behaviors bear resemblance to what happens in an "artificial" neural network when you throw too many neurons at a problem: You end up getting these weird behaviors wherein the system will have just-so overcomplicated results that instead of targeting general solutions to problems will wind up producing answers only on the clear set.

As such it is generally the case that when a system has too many neurons in it, it will ONLY be correct with respect to the exact process or training set, and things outside that set will confuse it.

The best answer I can see to this is training someone early and carefully and well to be obsessed with creating accurate models that feature no junky bits and which operate in general ways: essentially philosophical rejection of memorization and rote learning.

Is autism an over dense brain? I never heard that before.

I get what you are saying. Its kind of like of like when we search for item-a on youtube and end up watching hours on item-z. Lets limit the list of facts. But could it be thought as a simple list of facts. Basically, treat them like we treat children. I do not mean that in a bad way. Think about how we teach and treat children. When they "drift", we go with it. We teach one thing at a time. Like "The Sun makes day time". To a 3 year old, that works and we accept it. Making them describe that its actually earth rotating may not be the best option ... yet

 

[Jarhyn]

Autists often have trouble recognizing sarcasm. This was the most charitable explanation for your confusion.

I once saw an explanation comparing Autism to Schitzophrenic disorders, wherein Autism was described in terms of neural density.

Many autistic behaviors bear resemblance to what happens in an "artificial" neural network when you throw too many neurons at a problem: You end up getting these weird behaviors wherein the system will have just-so overcomplicated results that instead of targeting general solutions to problems will wind up producing answers only on the clear set.

As such it is generally the case that when a system has too many neurons in it, it will ONLY be correct with respect to the exact process or training set, and things outside that set will confuse it.

The best answer I can see to this is training someone early and carefully and well to be obsessed with creating accurate models that feature no junky bits and which operate in general ways: essentially philosophical rejection of memorization and rote learning.

Is autism an over dense brain? I never heard that before.

I get what you are saying. Its kind of like of like when we search for item-a on youtube and end up watching hours on item-z. Lets limit the list of facts. But could it be thought as a simple list of facts. Basically, treat them like we treat children. I do not mean that in a bad way. Think about how we teach and treat children. When they "drift", we go with it. We teach one thing at a time. Like "The Sun makes day time". To a 3 year old, that works and we accept it. Making them describe that its actually earth rotating may not be the best option ... yet

Actually, just-so facts are the enemy here. You have to instill a structure solutions that function generally, and a strategy for identifying under-general solutions and weeding them out, while implementing as many eclectic subjects as possible: you have to figure out a way to fill it with knowledge that is not 'just-so' facts, despite the fact that there's more neurons to "fill" with such "simplified" machines.

Whenever a memorization happens, it may be best to quash it and generalize instead.

Then, the rest of the spare neurons can be eaten in pre-processing scenarios and frontloading mental effort.

 

[SIB]

Autists often have trouble recognizing sarcasm. This was the most charitable explanation for your confusion.

I once saw an explanation comparing Autism to Schitzophrenic disorders, wherein Autism was described in terms of neural density.

Many autistic behaviors bear resemblance to what happens in an "artificial" neural network when you throw too many neurons at a problem: You end up getting these weird behaviors wherein the system will have just-so overcomplicated results that instead of targeting general solutions to problems will wind up producing answers only on the clear set.

As such it is generally the case that when a system has too many neurons in it, it will ONLY be correct with respect to the exact process or training set, and things outside that set will confuse it.

The best answer I can see to this is training someone early and carefully and well to be obsessed with creating accurate models that feature no junky bits and which operate in general ways: essentially philosophical rejection of memorization and rote learning.

Is autism an over dense brain? I never heard that before.

I get what you are saying. Its kind of like of like when we search for item-a on youtube and end up watching hours on item-z. Lets limit the list of facts. But could it be thought as a simple list of facts. Basically, treat them like we treat children. I do not mean that in a bad way. Think about how we teach and treat children. When they "drift", we go with it. We teach one thing at a time. Like "The Sun makes day time". To a 3 year old, that works and we accept it. Making them describe that its actually earth rotating may not be the best option ... yet

Actually, just-so facts are the enemy here. You have to instill a structure solutions that function generally, and a strategy for identifying under-general solutions and weeding them out, while implementing as many eclectic subjects as possible: you have to figure out a way to fill it with knowledge that is not 'just-so' facts, despite the fact that there's more neurons to "fill" with such "simplified" machines.

Whenever a memorization happens, it may be best to quash it and generalize instead.

Then, the rest of the spare neurons can be eaten in pre-processing scenarios and frontloading mental effort.

Happens every time I chew gun and walk. I either bite my tong or trip over a painted stripe. Toss in trying to see where I am going and things go sideways fast.

I would say they can be a problem. The brain gets a flood of messages and sorts through them. They can be a problem. However, that flexibility is also what allows the brain to handle error better than programs to me.

The problem is when it should go blue screen of death it doesn't and we are left with dealing with a wayward machine.

 

[ZiprHead]

Pre-order Price Guarantee. Details

In The Great Reset: And the War for the World, the most controversial man on earth Alex Jones gives you a full analysis of The Great Reset, the global elite's international conspiracy to enslave humanity and all life on the planet.

If you really want to know what’s happening in the world, this is the one book you must read now. Alex Jones is the most censored man on the planet and you should ask yourself why that is. There is a powerful authoritarian takeover in process that is seeking to capture the entire human system and turn it into an artificial factory farm controlled system. We are in a war for the future of the world. In this book, you will hear from the world’s elites, from their own mouths, what they are planning for you and your families and you will learn what you can do to fight it.

From central bankers, corporate billionaires, and corrupted government officials, global elites have been organizing a historic war on humanity under a trans-humanist, scientific dictatorship. Alex Jones was the first major figure to expose the World Economic Forum’s agenda. He has dedicated the last 30 years of his life to studying The Great Reset, conducting tens of thousands of interviews with top-level scientists, politicians, and military officials in order to reverse engineer their secrets and help awaken humanity.

The Great Reset: And the War for the World chronicles the history of the global elites' rise to power and reveals how they’ve captured the governments of the world and financed The Great Reset to pave the way for The New World Order.

Once dubbed a conspiracy theory, but now openly promoted by the most powerful corporations and governments, The Great Reset is a planned attempt to redistribute all the world’s wealth and power into the hands of banks, corporations, billionaires, and The World Economic Forum.

If you read one book in a lifetime, this is it. In The Great Reset: And the War for the World, you will discover from the self-appointed controllers of the planet in their own words, their plan for what they call the final revolution, or The Great Reset.

The only way this corporate fascist conspiracy can succeed is if the people of the world are not aware of it. And this book lays out their sinister blueprint and how to stop it. While many great books have been written to help awaken people to this sinister agenda, no author has ever spent as much time and research on The Great Reset as Alex Jones.

The Great Reset: And the War for the World is the undisputed trailblazer for understanding what’s happening and how to stop it.