I came across the argument that if abiogenesis occurred it had to occur a specific way, and the way that abiogenesis had to occur is physically impossible based on impossibility of the specific way.
I don't mind talking about abiogenesis but this particular argument seems self deprecating.
I am not sure how to respond reasonably other than to say it is illogical, I was hoping for something more elaborate and definitive.
I looked over the list of fallacies on wiki, but my brain seems like it is getting overloaded so I may have missed the identifying fallacy...
So any help as to identifying the fallacy? to me it just seems illogical and weird, mostly word salad...
I don't mind talking about abiogenesis but this particular argument seems self deprecating.
I am not sure how to respond reasonably other than to say it is illogical, I was hoping for something more elaborate and definitive.
I looked over the list of fallacies on wiki, but my brain seems like it is getting overloaded so I may have missed the identifying fallacy...
So any help as to identifying the fallacy? to me it just seems illogical and weird, mostly word salad...