• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Hive Mind: How Your Nation's IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own

ApostateAbe

Veteran Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2002
Messages
1,299
Location
Colorado, USA
Basic Beliefs
Infotheist. I believe the gods to be mere information.
A recent book by the economist Garett Jones builds on the work of the intelligence researcher Richard Lynn, titled "Hive Mind: How Your Nation's IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own." Jones published a similar paper in 2011 with the following four points in his abstract:

1. Intelligence is associated with patience and hence higher savings rates
2. Intelligence causes cooperation
3. Higher group intelligence opens the door to using fragile, high-value production technologies
4. Intelligence is associated with supporting market-oriented policies

But, unlike Lynn, Jones is NOT a racial hereditarian. He believes that regional IQs can be sufficiently increased through environmental changes, such as removing lead and arsenic from drinking water. Lynn's correlation between national IQ and GDP per capita (0.5) is strong enough that the data can not be rightly dismissed as irrelevant, even accepting the taboos that disparage the racial hereditarian theory.

A mixed review of the book was published in the journal Intelligence. The criticism claims the book is neglecting the idea that maybe self-control does the causal work, not intelligence, so improving intelligence may not improve self-control. Such points are important, because, if we want to improve humanity through either genetic engineering or environmental improvement, concentrating on intelligence alone may not be enough. Many intelligence researchers have treated IQ as though it is a unified explanation for all the many things IQ is correlated with, such as lack of crime, but I find that presumption unlikely, and there may be considerable risk in improving intelligence without also enhancing the many other K-selected attributes. It could mean many more intelligent criminals.
 
That's along my lines of thinking. "Racial" differences are really a reflection of the society and not genetic.
 
"Whereas IQ scores do a moderately good job of predicting individual wages, information processing power, and brain size, a country's average score is a much stronger bellwether of its overall prosperity."​

IOW, the IQ-prosperity correlation is much stronger at the aggregate national level than at the individual level. Such discrepancies is correlations at different levels of analysis are nearly always the result of the larger correlation being heavily due to non-causal confounding factors that exist and are much stronger at one level but not the other.

Many variables only really exist or are highly correlated with the variables of interest (IQ and prosperity) at the aggregate group level and not the individual level. Almost everything the comprises "culture" is a group level variable and not an individual one. Individuals do not reliably differ in their governments and thus countless government policies, some random pairs of individuals are tied to the same and some different governments. But nations do reliably differ in all those variables tied to government (the same for geographic region, exposure to natural disasters, toxins, etc..). Also, individuals do not reliably differ in education amount or quality nearly to the extent that groups (whether racial, national, or geographic).

Thus, there are countless additional (or stronger) confounds at the aggregate level than the individual level, so if a relationship is entirely or partly a product of confounds, then it will tend to be greater at the aggregate level.

That said, because different levels of analysis do not have the same potential confounds, if a relationship is consistently found at all levels of analysis (even if it varies in size), then this increases the probability that part of the relationship is more directly causal (though it doesn't solve causal direction).
 
Long interview with the author here:

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zsh_b70NSFQ[/YOUTUBE]
 
Back
Top Bottom