• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

How Christian Reform Schools Get Away with Brutal Child Abuse

Potoooooooo

Contributor
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
7,004
Location
Floridas
Basic Beliefs
atheist
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...form-schools-get-away-with-brutal-child-abuse
Kimi Cook was 15 years old when she arrived at Lester Roloff’s Rebekah Home for Girls in Corpus Christi, Texas. Eager to end the teenager’s relationship with an older boyfriend, her parents pitched the place as an accelerated boarding school. Cook—who had previously done well on tests despite cutting classes at her San Antonio public school—eventually agreed to a month-long trial period.

Within hours of arriving, Cook learned she was no longer allowed to wear jeans, listen to rock music, or use tampons. She would also be required to attend church daily, memorize and chant from the Bible, and scrub her room early each morning. Disobedience was met with strict punishment ranging from revoked snack privileges to receiving “licks” with a wooden paddle, being put in an isolated closet, or being forced to kneel on linoleum for hours on end.



When she was allowed phone calls, Cook pleaded with her family to save her from what she remembered describing as a “jail” and “prison camp.” But three months in, she learned that no help was coming. As Cook recalled, a relative “explained to me that by signing the admittance paper, I had signed myself over into the care of the Roloff homes.”

By the time Cook started there, in 1983, the Southern Baptist Rebekah Home for Girls had already been the subject of state investigations spanning the previous decade, instigated in part by parents who witnessed a girl being whipped at the facility. In fact, Roloff had already temporarily closed the school—and the other homes he operated in Texas—after being prosecuted by the state on behalf of 16 former Rebekah Home for Girls residents. (Roloff grew even more notorious for exclaiming in court, “Better a pink bottom than a black soul.”)

After losing his last Supreme Court appeal in 1978, the Rebekah Home for Girls became the site of the “Christian Alamo,” where religious leaders formed a human chain around the place to defend against attempts to remove girls from Roloff’s care. The issue was eventually “resolved” by Governor Bill Clements, who Roloff himself had campaigned for. With an ally in office—Clements once said the closures amounted to “nitpicking” by his predecessor—Roloff transferred ownership of the homes from Roloff Enterprises to Roloff’s People’s Baptist Church; under this religious auspice, a state court ruled Roloff’s homes could operate without a license.

Roloff himself died in 1982, but by then he had established a strong tradition of exploiting the religious freedom loophole to shield suspect youth residential facilities from outside scrutiny. Somehow, that same loophole still exists across much of America today.
 
This should be a lesson in semantics. For awhile now, there has been little hope in coming to terms with how to reconcile the different views of what actions constitute child abuse, but never mind all that. We now know that when someone of a particular frame of mind regards something as BRUTAL, there should be little reason to conjure in the mind the kinds of actions one might otherwise consider BRUTAL.
 
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...form-schools-get-away-with-brutal-child-abuse
Kimi Cook was 15 years old when she arrived at Lester Roloff’s Rebekah Home for Girls in Corpus Christi, Texas. Eager to end the teenager’s relationship with an older boyfriend, her parents pitched the place as an accelerated boarding school. Cook—who had previously done well on tests despite cutting classes at her San Antonio public school—eventually agreed to a month-long trial period..

Abuse exists and such abuse will continue to exist because even the victims when they grow up end up supporting such religions or keep their silence on what happened. Religion has done a great job of brainwashing people - "Jesus is the only way" - are we to believe that educated people in the 21st century believe that God will divide people based on religion? Doesn't that mean what we did in life doesn't matter? Doesn't that mean collective condemnation and reward on a massive scale? A good atheist who dies fighting for his country is sent to hell whereas the likes of Moore can cry their way into Heaven? As long as we do not question such ideas, we are condemned to live in these societies dominated by such religions. we have no one to blame but ourselves

I can fully understand how these ideas were formed - the ancients lived in totally different times - the times they lived in were brutal, violent - a good king was a treasure - to be obeyed unconditionally if they sought a decent life - that is where these ideas are coming from. God was made in the image of their powerful Kings/Masters

What i find shocking is that we are supposed to be that much more brighter, far more educated and intelligent but when it comes to religion there seems to be a collective brainwashing that takes place, blindly following out-dated and primitive ideas of God
 
What the hell is the no-tampons rule all about? Basic humiliation? I thought God's Word taught them a radical horror of the menses -- that basically Mom is supposed to camp in the back yard if she's on the rag. So why would the Christers not want that stuff mopped up for disposal? (Actually I would hope that the no-tampon rule would qualify as criminal abuse of a minor and could get the faithful locked up.)
 
This should be a lesson in semantics. For awhile now, there has been little hope in coming to terms with how to reconcile the different views of what actions constitute child abuse, but never mind all that. We now know that when someone of a particular frame of mind regards something as BRUTAL, there should be little reason to conjure in the mind the kinds of actions one might otherwise consider BRUTAL.

Not really. No remotely decent human being would read that article and not think that many of the acts were "brutal" abuse that the abusers should spend most of their lives in prison for.

If raping and beating kids doesn't qualify as brutal to you, that is not a lesson in semantics, but a lesson in what it means to be a sociopath.
 
"But three months in, she learned that no help was coming."

So I wonder if the parents were unable, or unwilling, to undo their mistake with this "troubled teen"?
 
"But three months in, she learned that no help was coming."

So I wonder if the parents were unable, or unwilling, to undo their mistake with this "troubled teen"?

She probably was a rebellious child, and unable to do the proper way to put the girl on the right track, they decided for help from a solid institution.

Look at the years when those events happened.

In Texas it was common for the teacher to use a belt or a stick and "enforce correction" to students, and when the parents knew about it, they went to the school and gave thanks to the teacher.

In those years, in most countries around the world, the instruction in school was similar, teachers used a strong and long stick to impart order in classrooms.

So, this is not about "religious schools only", it is about the education system in those years in several parts of the US and the world in general.
 
It is not just Christians, there was an abuse scandal in American Hindu-Krishna schools, mostly American converts. Internationally Buddhists as well.

It is endemic to all human groups.

http://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/09/u...tails-past-abuse-at-its-boarding-schools.html

And still the actual causal link is not discussed even when, like what the Hare Krishna schools, the leadership acknowledges wrongdoing. They ignore the fact the roots are buried in accepting claims without evidence, then teaching others to accept claims without evidence, so it is no wonder when a group of any type of individual gets it into their heads that such behavior is acceptable, or at least easily excuse with a few well meant prayers rather than reviewing the actions and deciding which if any, need modification or to be flat out stopped.

Instead, the guru, along with many believers and leaders of any other faith, spoke quite profusely on the "loss of faith", that they were "lead away" or had dropped it as a result of the actions of the abusers. Sooooo, he's not interested at all in the effects of that abuse, or the causes or anything to do with it. He's interested in the one thing far too many believers are still interested in: how many others around them can they hoodwink, trick, lie to or ply full of useless or false platitudes enough that they stop thinking an just believe.

So you're right in that it is, well maybe not so much endemic as pandemic and systematic of not-thinkers to first gather in large groups, and then to try and put others to those groups, then make up silly differences to try an have it sound like they know something valuable as a result of not thinking, followed by any means they see fit to have everyone else toe the line, or get ostracized/pinalized/punished or abused.

Of course, it is much easier to accept claims without evidence and then use that acceptance to try an swindle or pull the wool over on others at the very least, if not heading toward abuse or restrictions of some other group's rights, when a person or group says it has to do with their "faith" or "religion".

So let's be clear in that yes it can happen in any group, but it's groups that already work off a framework of outlandish assumptions, false promises, outrageously unsupported or even logically/physically impossible claims, none of which holding any evidence up behind them, that are not only more numerous but also because they are extra protected above all others even when it causes great harm to children around the world then they are inherently more dangerous. To everyone.

Those kids did nothing to warrant such treatment because you can't even argue properly that prisoners who committed a crime deserve being subjugated to unmitigated violence every single day while supposedly only arriving at that physical location in order to learn about the world and how to do math, reading, writing an hopefully some kind of training for later in life to encompass work related activities.

I'll stress this last point even if it is a tag on to an earlier one: most people who are willing to silence or hold back their own logically empathetic and correct to reality thoughts are just as susceptible of trying to cause all manner of wrong in other areas of each society because it's easy, it feels good, it feels right, they like it, or jut plain believe it, and whatever else they come up with as an excuse.

Although, as I said, any one person or group can become harmful to others, those enduring magical/warped/irrational/religious or faith-based thinking are automatically consigning their own minds to ideas that make it okay, as long as they believe hard enough and worship constant enough and ask and beg to not repeat enough, to perpetuate or excuse or ignore wrongs that humans commit against others.

And if we're going to ignore the world's primary, largest, longest running excuse in how to be immoral toward others while believing it to be good were still at the same wrong starting point before we can get to other, newer causal links of abusive actions.

Final final point: Buddhist can be religious thinkers depending on if they accept either that the one buddha, or the 88 Buddha of the zen tradition are in their minds in any way either supernatural or having supernatural abilities, and some buddhists do think this, so it's not exactly true that they are somehow all that different from chrtistians who assault children for no reason.

Just sayin'.
 
The RCC teaches that it is the one and only Christian church, it has always presumed a moral authority and that image is protected at all costs. That sense of empowerment was inherited by the protestants. Any admission of a failing undermines the power image, especially for the RCC.
 
Back
Top Bottom