• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

'Hundreds' of masked men beat refugee children in Stockholm

I am actually surprised how quickly shit hit the fan. I expected much slower process. I think EU critters by now realized that people who were warning this would happen were 100% right. So now they appear starting actively de-inviting all these "refugees".

No. We dont. There is no extra "deportation" activity planned.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/28/sweden-to-expel-up-to-80000-rejected-asylum-seekers

The Title is Sweden sends sharp signal with plan to expel up to 80,000 asylum seekers

Clearly the earlier warnings (frequently deemed as racist) were ignored and sensible measure would have saved Sweden billions of dollars which includes increasing its police forces and presence.
 
No. We dont. There is no extra "deportation" activity planned.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/28/sweden-to-expel-up-to-80000-rejected-asylum-seekers

The Title is Sweden sends sharp signal with plan to expel up to 80,000 asylum seekers

Clearly the earlier warnings (frequently deemed as racist) were ignored and sensible measure would have saved Sweden billions of dollars which includes increasing its police forces and presence.

Clearly you gave no idea what you are talking about. That number was based on statistics of how many has been rejected previous years.
 
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/28/sweden-to-expel-up-to-80000-rejected-asylum-seekers

The Title is Sweden sends sharp signal with plan to expel up to 80,000 asylum seekers

Clearly the earlier warnings (frequently deemed as racist) were ignored and sensible measure would have saved Sweden billions of dollars which includes increasing its police forces and presence.

Clearly you gave no idea what you are talking about. That number was based on statistics of how many has been rejected previous years.
And you have?
Article says that Sweden no longer gives permanent residence to refugees, That means they DO plan to send them ALL back once war is over.
 
Clearly you gave no idea what you are talking about. That number was based on statistics of how many has been rejected previous years.
And you have?
Article says that Sweden no longer gives permanent residence to refugees, That means they DO plan to send them ALL back once war is over.

The problem is most are not refugees from the war regions. Also countries like Morocco, Algeria, Pakistan and Bangladesh are not fully cooperating with Germany to return its own persons.
https://www.rt.com/news/329301-morocco-algeria-refugees-germany/

Here is a santized piece of news media which is flawed in many places as follows
Sweden provides accommodation for all Moroccan so called children
A large proportion then leave or abscond and prefer to live rough and many are involved in petty crime.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...8729f8-beba-11e5-98c8-7fab78677d51_story.html

The Latest: Sweden, Morocco deal on rejected asylum minors


If this deal goes through then it means Sweden will not recognize Western Sahara
The announcement comes four days after the Swedish government decided not to recognize a disputed territory in Western Sahara as an independent republic.


Let's see how quickly Sweden works to reverse its failed mass migration policy

Providing no permanent residence means nothing. Britain has hundreds of thousands of people who were supposed to be deported but were not.
So when will the war end in Syria 20 years? I think sooner but the US is causing problems for the Russian brokered peace deal. However only a fraction are from Syria. Then if Assad has to go there will be chaos like Libya and Iraq.

However only a few refugees are from Syria. Then there is the logistics involved in deporting hundreds of thousands back home. This may be spread over a period of time allowing many to disappear into the woodwork.

See an earlier article from 23 September 2015 which was one of many warnings that went unheeded.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...7c6026-5bd8-11e5-8475-781cc9851652_story.html

VIENNA — Moving among the tens of thousands of Syrian war refugees passing through the train stations of Europe are many who are neither Syrian nor refugees, but hoping to blend into the mass migration and find a back door to the West.

There are well-dressed Iranians speaking Farsi who insist they are members of the persecuted Yazidis of Iraq. There are Indians who don’t speak Arabic but say they are from Damascus. There are Pakistanis, Albanians, Egyptians, Kosovars, Somalis and Tunisians from countries with plenty of poverty and violence, but no war.

Swimming in the river of humanity are shady characters, too, admitted criminals, Islamic State sympathizers and a couple of guys from Fallujah, one with a fresh bullet wound, who when asked their occupation seemed confused.


AND
The refugees report that a forged Syrian passport can be bought on the Turkish border for as little as $200. A reporter for Britain’s Daily Mail bought a Syrian passport, ID card and driver’s license for $2,000 in Turkey under the name of a real man who was killed in the conflict.
 
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/28/sweden-to-expel-up-to-80000-rejected-asylum-seekers

The Title is Sweden sends sharp signal with plan to expel up to 80,000 asylum seekers

Clearly the earlier warnings (frequently deemed as racist) were ignored and sensible measure would have saved Sweden billions of dollars which includes increasing its police forces and presence.

Clearly you gave no idea what you are talking about. That number was based on statistics of how many has been rejected previous years.

Sweden claims it will expel up to 80,000 as I said but that is simply a broad brush figure.. It's going to cost a lot to do that. How many planes does the tax payer need to pay for. Only about 400 based on an average of 200 per flight If these are based on those rejected years ago why are they still in Sweden. Germany is experiencing problems in returning migrants.

If Sweden had simply closed the door on just fake Asylum seekers, then only a fraction would have entered.
 
In fact some are older once the DNA is tested. .
More of your vague accusations. There is no way to reliable test age with DNA within reasonable limits.

The younger the real age, the smaller the errors in DNA age estimation, with errors for teens within a 2.5 year range for a specific person. Thus a result estimating an age of 20 for someone claiming to be 15 strongly indicates their are lying and are above 18 and closer to even to 22 than 15.

Also, the errors are random, meaning they average to zero for a sample. Thus, any difference between the avg estimated age of a sample and the avg real age of that sample reflects a systematic difference due to the real avg age being closer to the estimate. Thus, it is possible to reliably tell that a sample of people are on average older or younger than they claim, even when that difference is within the error rates which apply to individual estimates not samples of estimates.
 
More of your vague accusations. There is no way to reliable test age with DNA within reasonable limits.

The younger the real age, the smaller the errors in DNA age estimation, with errors for teens within a 2.5 year range for a specific person. Thus a result estimating an age of 20 for someone claiming to be 15 strongly indicates their are lying and are above 18 and closer to even to 22 than 15.

Also, the errors are random, meaning they average to zero for a sample. Thus, any difference between the avg estimated age of a sample and the avg real age of that sample reflects a systematic difference due to the real avg age being closer to the estimate. Thus, it is possible to reliably tell that a sample of people are on average older or younger than they claim, even when that difference is within the error rates which apply to individual estimates not samples of estimates.

Some estimates are five years and of course as indicated people biologically develop faster than others.
 
image.jpeg

I am not sure which point is being made by her or if the sign has been altered.
 
I am not sure which point is being made by her or if the sign has been altered.
Of course it's altered (the fact that all the letters are identical between the two words should have been a clue). Original sign says "will trade racists for refugees".
 
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/28/sweden-to-expel-up-to-80000-rejected-asylum-seekers

The Title is Sweden sends sharp signal with plan to expel up to 80,000 asylum seekers

Clearly the earlier warnings (frequently deemed as racist) were ignored and sensible measure would have saved Sweden billions of dollars which includes increasing its police forces and presence.

Clearly you gave no idea what you are talking about. That number was based on statistics of how many has been rejected previous years.

80,000 is still a lot of people whether from yesterday or 3 years ago. How long will that take considering Germany is facing problems with some countries (Morocco, Algeria, Pakistan and others) who are not prompt in responding?
 
Were you really unable to spot such an obvious image alteration?

Do you want people to think you're an idiot?

If the photo turns to be unedited the protester could be dyslectic.

You both must be taking the piss--you can't be this stupid.

It's an obvious photoshop job; the 'RA' and 'ISTS' have been cloned from 'RACISTS', and the 'P' is a clone of the 'R' but with the down stroke erased.
 
Back
Top Bottom