They're obsessed about the world not falling for their laptop hoax and are saying the MSM are suppressing it.
-
Features
Hunter Biden laptop derail from Twitter thread
- Thread starter Trausti
- Start date
It's no doubt a copy of his actual machine. The question is whether it has been edited--and given the chain of events this has to be presumed likely.
No he's not. Elon is basically saying people who litter should get the same jail sentence as murderers because both are breaking the law. Or, in order to be fair a news outlet must have the same amount of scientists as flat earthers in their stories.
You've moved from banning to suspension, you are unwilling to provide any details or context and you still haven't supplied a single link.
You are doing a real shit job promoting this hoax, babe.
Even Jack says sharing the story was blocked. Come on, man.
Good for Jack. Nobody is going to believe this hoax if that's all you got.
Cheerful Charlie
Contributor
...
There is a lot of garbage out there purported to be from Biden's laptop that are not from the laptop. But rat f---king dirty tricks from liars and QAnon crazies.
The original repair shop owner that got this laptop has publicly reported that much of this right wing garbage is not from Biden's laptop. Be skeptical about the right wing's bleating about the content of the hard disk. Most of it is lies.
There is a lot of garbage out there purported to be from Biden's laptop that are not from the laptop. But rat f---king dirty tricks from liars and QAnon crazies.
The original repair shop owner that got this laptop has publicly reported that much of this right wing garbage is not from Biden's laptop. Be skeptical about the right wing's bleating about the content of the hard disk. Most of it is lies.
TSwizzle
I am unburdened by what has been.
The Disinformation Governance Board approves this message 
I don't give a fuck about it. But I do give a fuck about a social media company banning circulation of an article because it contained 'unverifiable facts'.
No one was banned, so I guess you are talking about something else.
The article was prevented from being shared. No person was banned. I did not say a person was banned.
Said company is a private organization and makes up its own rules. I didn't see you prancing back and forth with a free Kaepernick sign when the NFL suspended him for kneeling.
Don2 (Don1 Revised)
Contributor
From a TheVerge article back in October of 2020:
Emphasis added.
To be clear, conservatives were being told that liberal media was banning them for content and they started flipping out and canceling "Big Tech." Big Tech responded by changing their policies--policies that everyone else had previously, historically had to adhere to including liberals--but the giant exception was made, reinterpretations of policies were done, and finally rewriting policy in order to maintain the political privileges of the elite classes of America.
In regard to some of the content, from Wikipedia:
Emphasis added.
To add some confusion, the Wikipedia article also states that some of the emails in question have been authenticated, and much of that work is very recent.
Emphasis added.
To be clear, conservatives were being told that liberal media was banning them for content and they started flipping out and canceling "Big Tech." Big Tech responded by changing their policies--policies that everyone else had previously, historically had to adhere to including liberals--but the giant exception was made, reinterpretations of policies were done, and finally rewriting policy in order to maintain the political privileges of the elite classes of America.
In regard to some of the content, from Wikipedia:
Emphasis added.
To add some confusion, the Wikipedia article also states that some of the emails in question have been authenticated, and much of that work is very recent.
Yes, it's a private company. I didn't say they ought not be allowed to do it. I said their 'censoring service' is not something I value. I have no use for Twitter's 'trust and safety council' nannying me. I can decide for myself which stories I want to read and which people I want to block.
Musk has decided Twitter will comply with local laws but he won't be actively censoring or banning people. I think that will make Twitter better. Leftists don't. It's still a private company that can do what it wants.
Also, expressing disagreement with a private company's actions does not mean I want the State to force the private company to do something. I think Ben and Jerry's social justice ice cream tubs are bone-deep, soul's core cringe, but if consumers want to buy their massively overpriced product, let 'em.
Look at what has happened to the places that don't censor--they turn into total cesspools.
You are welcome to find an alternative to Twitter if you want a Trust and Safety Council to nanny you.
In the meantime, Twitter is currently the most toxic popular social media platform ever devised, for all its banning and shadowbanning and policies and "safety".
Perhaps all the pearl-clutching Musk-haters leaving the platform will help improve the experience.
It's nothing compared to His Flatulence's abomination. It's just that's not popular because it's such a cesspool.