I can see why so many say Hillary is unlikable

[Tristan Scott]

I haven't watched many of her campaign speeches, but came across this one on the trending video list. She comes off as unlikable, completely lacking in charisma, in this speech. I can see why there are so many people who have a negative opinion of her. I can't believe this is the best the democrats could come up with:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_T8tMk-ZOx8[/youtube]

I say this as I dread a Trump presidency. This seems like the easiest guy to beat, unless you pick one of the most hated candidates the Democrats could muster to run in opposition.

This completely illustrates why the US has become known as DUMBFUCKISTAN.

Unlikeable? How the fuck does anyone know and why the fuck does anyone give a shit. The American voters worry too much about shit they know nothing about. We think we "know" Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, but we don't. All we really know is what they actually have done, and frankly that is all we should be focused on. What they have actually done.

 

[another1]

That is a bad video of her. Not good at all.

I'm not saying Hillary looks sick because I dislike her. I love her. She is a female politician. She digests men like Trump. I don't know what is going on, but there should be no need for a debate tonight. Seriously. What is going on? It has all been said with no progress so I'll stop after this, but I find it very off that Trump is where he is right now. Against Clinton? That is just CRUEL to Donald Turmp. Putting him in the same rom with that wonderful woman and letting her get to work on him? Cruel. Even if he is an asshole, nobody deserves that pun ishment.

The ONLY way Trump has a chance (don't believe the current polls) to be our president is Clinton's health. She has done no wrong in my eyes, and she is a wonderful person. Partly synthetic, like all major politicians, but wonderful. I couldn't ask for a better female to run.

I'm worried that her obvious health issues are going to cause some problems in the following weeks. Like I said, it may just be bronchitis, Lyme disease or a sprinkle of old-timer's disease. So what? Reagan didn't know his middle name, and he had his finger on the imaginary button that made us who we are today. lol@button. The invaluable fear generated by that imaginary button was made possible by a man who didn't know where he was half the time. What about Hoover? What about the devout pothead Lincoln? Washington was a smoker, too? If the President is so damn important, why the hell is TRUMP allowed anywhere near that debate stage tonight? Reagan pulled it off, why can't Clinton with a small case of HIV?

 

[arkirk]

Clinton opposed a raise in Haiti of the minimum wage to sixty cents an hour. She actually intervened in the matter to keep those darkies working for her friends super poor. The woman is unscrupulous and makes a show of pretending to have human values. Show me a $28 million dollar annual income and I will show you a crooked secretary of state. "Right to work" whatever she says about this is immaterial. She has fought minimum wage laws till she found herself losing. She lies and her promises are all empty.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Clinton opposed a raise in Haiti of the minimum wage to sixty cents an hour. She actually intervened in the matter to keep those darkies working for her friends super poor. The woman is unscrupulous and makes a show of pretending to have human values. Show me a $28 million dollar annual income and I will show you a crooked secretary of state. "Right to work" whatever she says about this is immaterial. She has fought minimum wage laws till she found herself losing. She lies and her promises are all empty.

I would like to excuse her faults but now it seems her campaign is increasingly resorting to mud slinging, a common tactic for oor politicians to divert attention from their own shortcomings. I assume she returned all the White House Property she took when she left the place but if an employee in an office took property that was not his or her own he would possible be fired.

Now as the least of a bad bunch I tend to say Trump is the least bad with the gap widening a little.

 

[whichphilosophy]

That is a bad video of her. Not good at all.

I'm not saying Hillary looks sick because I dislike her. I love her. She is a female politician. She digests men like Trump. I don't know what is going on, but there should be no need for a debate tonight. Seriously. What is going on? It has all been said with no progress so I'll stop after this, but I find it very off that Trump is where he is right now. Against Clinton? That is just CRUEL to Donald Turmp. Putting him in the same rom with that wonderful woman and letting her get to work on him? Cruel. Even if he is an asshole, nobody deserves that pun ishment.

The ONLY way Trump has a chance (don't believe the current polls) to be our president is Clinton's health. She has done no wrong in my eyes, and she is a wonderful person. Partly synthetic, like all major politicians, but wonderful. I couldn't ask for a better female to run.

I'm worried that her obvious health issues are going to cause some problems in the following weeks. Like I said, it may just be bronchitis, Lyme disease or a sprinkle of old-timer's disease. So what? Reagan didn't know his middle name, and he had his finger on the imaginary button that made us who we are today. lol@button. The invaluable fear generated by that imaginary button was made possible by a man who didn't know where he was half the time. What about Hoover? What about the devout pothead Lincoln? Washington was a smoker, too? If the President is so damn important, why the hell is TRUMP allowed anywhere near that debate stage tonight? Reagan pulled it off, why can't Clinton with a small case of HIV?

Clinton enjoys a certain amount of popularity but she has not projected any clear sign how she is capable of leadership.
Apart from being a good circus performer I don't see any political attributes. She took credit for Libya which went from the highest standard of living in Africa to chaos and bloodshed.

Then
https://www.rt.com/usa/361017-clinton-failed-security-training/
The first batch of documents, which the Daily Caller received late on Tuesday, indeed contained copies of papers, signed by Clinton’s chief of staff Cheryl Mills and deputy chief Huma Abedin, showing that they both completed the course officially know as “Special Compartmented Information,” or SCI.

According to the papers, Mills signed her SCI ID agreement on January, 29, 2009, acknowledging obligations required by the sensitivity of her position in the department and her access to classified information. Clinton’s right-hand aide Abedin had her agreement signed the next day. It was also signed by Clinton’s adviser Jacob Sullivan.

However, the document which TheDCNF was presumably most interested in, was missing from the department’s release.

The 46 pages made no mention of Clinton herself signing onto her SCI responsibilities, leading to assumptions that she never completed the top-level security training.

Maybe she did, but in such matters the paperwork should be immaculate.

Akirk's point

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/f...sing-minimum-wage-to-62-cents/article/2589592

 

[Harry Bosch]

Clinton opposed a raise in Haiti of the minimum wage to sixty cents an hour. She actually intervened in the matter to keep those darkies working for her friends super poor. The woman is unscrupulous and makes a show of pretending to have human values. Show me a $28 million dollar annual income and I will show you a crooked secretary of state. "Right to work" whatever she says about this is immaterial. She has fought minimum wage laws till she found herself losing. She lies and her promises are all empty.

Yea and your buddy Trump supported the lower wages because some of the women were fat. Is that the kind of leader that you support??

 

[iolo]

An awful lot of Americans seem to believe they elect a President to be their Best Friend, like little girls in school. It seems to me a bad way to pick a Head of State. Wouldn't it make more sense to choose someone who knew something about the job?

 

[whichphilosophy]

An awful lot of Americans seem to believe they elect a President to be their Best Friend, like little girls in school. It seems to me a bad way to pick a Head of State. Wouldn't it make more sense to choose someone who knew something about the job?

Are you suggesting that people make logical choices before they vote. The voter gets bored on policy issues. What they like is entertainment and trading off insults. It sells TV media coverage and pop corn. It suits our primeval instincts to see to apes on stage going at each other (but not fighting each other). We have a refined language but the message will still get across if they hooted shrieked and grunted.

The current debates as we see don't relate to policies. Trump is accused of calling a beauty queen Miss Piggy and Ms Housekeeping (which is not substantiated) and claims he gave her an eating disorder.

Then his cameo part in a Playboy porn movie for just over a minute show him fully clothed popping a bottle of champagne.


She is on tape here and I hardly see what the fuss is.



Then Clinton alleged to have had enough strokes to kill a herd of horses. Nothing however is relating to the economy.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Clinton opposed a raise in Haiti of the minimum wage to sixty cents an hour. She actually intervened in the matter to keep those darkies working for her friends super poor. The woman is unscrupulous and makes a show of pretending to have human values. Show me a $28 million dollar annual income and I will show you a crooked secretary of state. "Right to work" whatever she says about this is immaterial. She has fought minimum wage laws till she found herself losing. She lies and her promises are all empty.

Yea and your buddy Trump supported the lower wages because some of the women were fat. Is that the kind of leader that you support??

Where was this.

Going by the Daily Mail (not the best media) it seems Trump pays more for his staff than Clinton does but Clinton claims a lesser gender gap difference.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-female-employees-Clinton-pays-men-more.html

 

[iolo]

An awful lot of Americans seem to believe they elect a President to be their Best Friend, like little girls in school. It seems to me a bad way to pick a Head of State. Wouldn't it make more sense to choose someone who knew something about the job?

Are you suggesting that people make logical choices before they vote. The voter gets bored on policy issues. What they like is entertainment and trading off insults. It sells TV media coverage and pop corn. It suits our primeval instincts to see to apes on stage going at each other (but not fighting each other). We have a refined language but the message will still get across if they hooted shrieked and grunted.

The current debates as we see don't relate to policies. Trump is accused of calling a beauty queen Miss Piggy and Ms Housekeeping (which is not substantiated) and claims he gave her an eating disorder.

Then his cameo part in a Playboy porn movie for just over a minute show him fully clothed popping a bottle of champagne.


She is on tape here and I hardly see what the fuss is.



Then Clinton alleged to have had enough strokes to kill a herd of horses. Nothing however is relating to the economy.

Do your politicians deal with issues? I see precious little evidence of it. If our electorate is anything to go by (and the American one sounds to be worse) they have been so totally deprived of effective policy choices, for so long, that they have grown total irresponsible, and for those of us who are grown up that does look incredibly dangerous.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Are you suggesting that people make logical choices before they vote. The voter gets bored on policy issues. What they like is entertainment and trading off insults. It sells TV media coverage and pop corn. It suits our primeval instincts to see to apes on stage going at each other (but not fighting each other). We have a refined language but the message will still get across if they hooted shrieked and grunted.

The current debates as we see don't relate to policies. Trump is accused of calling a beauty queen Miss Piggy and Ms Housekeeping (which is not substantiated) and claims he gave her an eating disorder.

Then his cameo part in a Playboy porn movie for just over a minute show him fully clothed popping a bottle of champagne.


She is on tape here and I hardly see what the fuss is.



Then Clinton alleged to have had enough strokes to kill a herd of horses. Nothing however is relating to the economy.

Do your politicians deal with issues? I see precious little evidence of it. If our electorate is anything to go by (and the American one sounds to be worse) they have been so totally deprived of effective policy choices, for so long, that they have grown total irresponsible, and for those of us who are grown up that does look incredibly dangerous.

In this election I don't see many issues being discussed. I'm from the UK.

 

[laughing dog]

An awful lot of Americans seem to believe they elect a President to be their Best Friend, like little girls in school. It seems to me a bad way to pick a Head of State. Wouldn't it make more sense to choose someone who knew something about the job?

Are you suggesting that people make logical choices before they vote. The voter gets bored on policy issues. What they like is entertainment and trading off insults. It sells TV media coverage and pop corn. It suits our primeval instincts to see to apes on stage going at each other (but not fighting each other). We have a refined language but the message will still get across if they hooted shrieked and grunted.

The current debates as we see don't relate to policies. Trump is accused of calling a beauty queen Miss Piggy and Ms Housekeeping (which is not substantiated) and claims he gave her an eating disorder.

Then his cameo part in a Playboy porn movie for just over a minute show him fully clothed popping a bottle of champagne.


She is on tape here and I hardly see what the fuss is.



Then Clinton alleged to have had enough strokes to kill a herd of horses. Nothing however is relating to the economy.

You seem to much better informed on the irrelevancies in this race than me or others who are actually in the USA. Mrs. Clinton routinely discusses what she thinks are the issues and how she plans to deal with him. Mr. Trump's plan for anything seems to be "Make America Great again" by hiring the best people who will come up with "great" (but unknown at this time) plans.