I like to hear someone that supports the concept of corporate personhood explain how that is compatible with our prohibition against slavery. If corporations have rights of persons we clearly can't allow them to be owned by other persons. Yet if we acknowledge corporations can be owned then we have introduced the idea they aren't persons and other restrictions and limitations of rights could be implemented.
If someone is held captive and forced to work they can sue their captors in civil court for damages. So the question of how can we allow a person to be owned still applies even if it were simply a civil law matter.I like to hear someone that supports the concept of corporate personhood explain how that is compatible with our prohibition against slavery. If corporations have rights of persons we clearly can't allow them to be owned by other persons. Yet if we acknowledge corporations can be owned then we have introduced the idea they aren't persons and other restrictions and limitations of rights could be implemented.
A corporation is a person in civil law not criminal law.
I like to hear someone that supports the concept of corporate personhood explain how that is compatible with our prohibition against slavery. If corporations have rights of persons we clearly can't allow them to be owned by other persons. Yet if we acknowledge corporations can be owned then we have introduced the idea they aren't persons and other restrictions and limitations of rights could be implemented.
A corporation is a person in civil law not criminal law.
If someone is held captive and forced to work they can sue their captors in civil court for damages. So the question of how can we allow a person to be owned still applies even if it were simply a civil law matter.A corporation is a person in civil law not criminal law.
You're not stating anything new here. Of course corps can be sued or sue, no one disputes that. What's in dispute is whether or not a corp is a person. Calling it slavery isn't making it an analogy. If its a person and owned by another person it is actual slavery. Do you think corporations are people and should have the same rights as people?A corporation can sue or be sued. A corporation can sue a former officer or employee. I'm an attorney. I've represented a company against its former managing member for harm caused by his breach of fiduciary duty. Your slavery analogy just isn't there.