Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 50,568
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
Well, the Indy 500 kind of got postponed this year. Whether it happens or not is to be seen. So on the normal day I watched Emerson Fitapaldi win his first Indy 500 on YouTube. And with the passing of my Father, I have felt compelled to watch a bunch more. Since then, thanks to YouTube, I've watched (in not this order), the races in '68, '78, '81, '83, '85. Interesting how the coverage changed over time.
'68 must have been cool when it was seen, but it is clearly an edit hatch job with fake live commentary when Jim McKay is allegedly calling the race and interviewing the racers in the Pit live during the race. It was tough watching '68 because the broadcast cameras were awful and the editing stole any possible cohesion with the event. '68 was a safe year, no one killed in the race and the accidents themselves relatively benign. One car fire, but it is something to watch a crash occur and then the driver is unbuckling themselves before the car comes to a stop to GTFO of their car. Compared to what I have been used to seeing my entire life, seeing those death traps is unsettling. '68 had the turbines again which did pretty well, but broke down near the end of the race. Honestly, it looks a bit suspicious that two of the Turbines broke down at about the exact same time. Jackie Stewart had a similar thing happen when he had the race virtually won. Conspiracy? I report, you decide! Got a kick out of McKay saying that this race would be talked about for 50 years (2018 would be 50 years!).
'78 and '81 broadcasts were after the fact, but they showed a lot more of the race and the camera work is great. '81 obviously has the infamous Bobby Unser pass that "stole" the race from Andretti. Because the broadcast is after the fact, the announcers make quite a big deal of it with the hindsight. Andretti actually is given the win on Monday, but Unser gets it back in court. Both drivers a bit easier about it these days, partly due to age. '81 did have a frightening Danny Ongais crash, which isn't completely caught on camera, but his legs dangling out, his head slumped, his car... almost non-existent. His injuries would ultimately not be quite as bad as they could have been, pretty much badly broken legs and a cut artery I think. It was definitely haunting to see him. It'd take until '85 I think when the nose cone needed to become indestructible.
I think it was the '78 Indy where they had an interview with Bobby Unser and he discussed the difference in safety when he started verses now, and how death was almost a fait accompli in those death traps, and you just had to accept it. Indeed, racing is much faster today and the vehicles and barriers much safer, even compared to the huge improvements from the 60s to the late 70s and early 80s.
'83 and '85 appear to be live or close to live broadcasts. Everything is great, though it feels weird to see this newcomer Al Unser Jr. '85 would be the famous Spin and Win and a deja vu Mario Andretti moment as a car that passes beneath him spins out in front of him (Parsons back in '83 and another I believe in '82). Danny Sullivan doesn't hit the wall and his Penske had enough power to get back in front of Andretti to win. '85 also had Scott Brayton on the pole in his Buick, which last maybe a dozen laps. I think I saw Brayton as a rookie in '78. He'd pass away, I saw it happen on TV live, in Indy in '96 in a crash while practicing in a backup car, after having won the pole. Andretti actually finished this race, did great, but didn't win. He'd only win Indy once, despite being arguably the greatest race driver of all time (supporters of Graham Hill and Jim Clark, Aryton Senna, arguably Nikki Lauda can get in line). If it had four wheels, Andretti won (not could have, but did) in it. He even won Daytona even when his pit crew allegedly held him up to try and keep him from winning in the last pit stop.
Indy Car has changed a lot. Back in the 80s and 90s and before that, races could have a single leader on the lead lap. The drama of a Goodyear / Unser Jr finish wasn't too common. Ever since the IndyCar/CART split, the cars became similar chassises and unlike NASCAR where cars are too similar, the racing at Indy has become ridiculously competitive.
'68 must have been cool when it was seen, but it is clearly an edit hatch job with fake live commentary when Jim McKay is allegedly calling the race and interviewing the racers in the Pit live during the race. It was tough watching '68 because the broadcast cameras were awful and the editing stole any possible cohesion with the event. '68 was a safe year, no one killed in the race and the accidents themselves relatively benign. One car fire, but it is something to watch a crash occur and then the driver is unbuckling themselves before the car comes to a stop to GTFO of their car. Compared to what I have been used to seeing my entire life, seeing those death traps is unsettling. '68 had the turbines again which did pretty well, but broke down near the end of the race. Honestly, it looks a bit suspicious that two of the Turbines broke down at about the exact same time. Jackie Stewart had a similar thing happen when he had the race virtually won. Conspiracy? I report, you decide! Got a kick out of McKay saying that this race would be talked about for 50 years (2018 would be 50 years!).
'78 and '81 broadcasts were after the fact, but they showed a lot more of the race and the camera work is great. '81 obviously has the infamous Bobby Unser pass that "stole" the race from Andretti. Because the broadcast is after the fact, the announcers make quite a big deal of it with the hindsight. Andretti actually is given the win on Monday, but Unser gets it back in court. Both drivers a bit easier about it these days, partly due to age. '81 did have a frightening Danny Ongais crash, which isn't completely caught on camera, but his legs dangling out, his head slumped, his car... almost non-existent. His injuries would ultimately not be quite as bad as they could have been, pretty much badly broken legs and a cut artery I think. It was definitely haunting to see him. It'd take until '85 I think when the nose cone needed to become indestructible.
I think it was the '78 Indy where they had an interview with Bobby Unser and he discussed the difference in safety when he started verses now, and how death was almost a fait accompli in those death traps, and you just had to accept it. Indeed, racing is much faster today and the vehicles and barriers much safer, even compared to the huge improvements from the 60s to the late 70s and early 80s.
'83 and '85 appear to be live or close to live broadcasts. Everything is great, though it feels weird to see this newcomer Al Unser Jr. '85 would be the famous Spin and Win and a deja vu Mario Andretti moment as a car that passes beneath him spins out in front of him (Parsons back in '83 and another I believe in '82). Danny Sullivan doesn't hit the wall and his Penske had enough power to get back in front of Andretti to win. '85 also had Scott Brayton on the pole in his Buick, which last maybe a dozen laps. I think I saw Brayton as a rookie in '78. He'd pass away, I saw it happen on TV live, in Indy in '96 in a crash while practicing in a backup car, after having won the pole. Andretti actually finished this race, did great, but didn't win. He'd only win Indy once, despite being arguably the greatest race driver of all time (supporters of Graham Hill and Jim Clark, Aryton Senna, arguably Nikki Lauda can get in line). If it had four wheels, Andretti won (not could have, but did) in it. He even won Daytona even when his pit crew allegedly held him up to try and keep him from winning in the last pit stop.
Indy Car has changed a lot. Back in the 80s and 90s and before that, races could have a single leader on the lead lap. The drama of a Goodyear / Unser Jr finish wasn't too common. Ever since the IndyCar/CART split, the cars became similar chassises and unlike NASCAR where cars are too similar, the racing at Indy has become ridiculously competitive.