The AntiChris
Senior Member
Physical injures are commonplace in, for example, sports. Most wouldn't view these occurrences as necessarily immoral.When, in your opinion, is it not?Not always.
When someone is physically injured or mentally harmed.
So child exploitation and pornography may be compared to sport where the players are adults, know and understand the risks involved yet participate for reward, be it pleasure or money?
You made no such distinction in your reply to me. You implied that all physical injury is immoral regardless of anyone's opinion.
Of course there's harm in my opinion. But this doesn't support your claim that there's harm regardless of anyone's opinion.I'd have thought that the assessment of what constitutes 'harm' is always subjective. If nobody considered X to be harmful (i.e. if nobody was of the opinion that X was harmful) it'd be difficult to see what the justification that X really was harmful might be.
Are children harmed when they are being used to produce child porn? Is that subjective? Is it questionable? Is it tolerable or harmless in some circumstances?