No regarding this point. We're talking about the book he published, not the length of his penis. The reality then is just that. Krauss made a fool of himself peddling an absurd story line instead of sticking to science. He did that either by hubris, for commercial gain, or possibly for some other sordid reason.
Reality beats scientists too, even good ones.
EB
What? Is there something in the book that isnt supported by science? If not why wouldnt the vehicle of a story line be allowed?