Is white genocide in our future?

[Half-Life]

Please read the part I bolded. That is essentially saying, "If a few whites have to die today because they were racist in the past, then so be it."

Please enlighten me as to the correct interpretation since I seem to be "missing it."

It totally does not say that. “Something needed to be done” does not require “civilians needed to be targeted to die.”
That is ridiculous and absurd.

What is wrong with you?



The answer was clearly given that the “something” should have been planning re-equalization of wealth to undo the vast damage done. How does that equal white people dying? Pathetic level of snowflake.

What if I said, "I hated 9/11 when it happened. But, something did need to be done about the world trade center."

Doesn't it look like I might be...MAYBE...perhaps....siding with the terrorists?

 

[Keith&Co.]

Please read the part I bolded. That is essentially saying, "If a few whites have to die today because they were racist in the past, then so be it."

Please enlighten me as to the correct interpretation since I seem to be "missing it."

It totally does not say that. “Something needed to be done” does not require “civilians needed to be targeted to die.”
That is ridiculous and absurd.

What is wrong with you?



The answer was clearly given that the “something” should have been planning re-equalization of wealth to undo the vast damage done. How does that equal white people dying? Pathetic level of snowflake.

What if I said

you still really suck at 'What If?'

And the part you bolded does not support your interpretation.

 

[abaddon]

Please read the part I bolded. That is essentially saying, "If a few whites have to die today because they were racist in the past, then so be it."

Please enlighten me as to the correct interpretation since I seem to be "missing it."

It totally does not say that. “Something needed to be done” does not require “civilians needed to be targeted to die.”
That is ridiculous and absurd.

What is wrong with you?

The answer was clearly given that the “something” should have been planning re-equalization of wealth to undo the vast damage done. How does that equal white people dying? Pathetic level of snowflake.

What if I said, "I hated 9/11 when it happened. But, something did need to be done about the world trade center."

Doesn't it look like I might be...MAYBE...perhaps....siding with the terrorists?

Yes. Which is why only a dishonest person would make the accusation. The "maybe" means you don't know. Not knowing means don't make any accusations.

If you're an honest person, you'll actively look for the "might be, maybe, perhaps" that the other person intended the best.

Only sophistic asses look for the worst possible interpretation in another's argument. If you're reading to understand, you have to seek the most positive way to interpret what the person is saying.

So next time there's a "maybe" there, you need to ask for clarification. If you have any interest in becoming an honest person.

(I know the "might be...MAYBE...perhaps..." was you mocking. But, looking at it again, you should be able to see the "maybe, maybe not" even in your own example).

 

[laughing dog]

Please read the part I bolded. That is essentially saying, "If a few whites have to die today because they were racist in the past, then so be it."

Please enlighten me as to the correct interpretation since I seem to be "missing it."

It totally does not say that. “Something needed to be done” does not require “civilians needed to be targeted to die.”
That is ridiculous and absurd.

What is wrong with you?



The answer was clearly given that the “something” should have been planning re-equalization of wealth to undo the vast damage done. How does that equal white people dying? Pathetic level of snowflake.

What if I said, "I hated 9/11 when it happened. But, something did need to be done about the world trade center."

Doesn't it look like I might be...MAYBE...perhaps....siding with the terrorists?

It takes a big leap of stupid to translate "something did need to be done about the world trade center" to "fly a plane into the world trade center in order to destroy it and kill lots of civilians".

 

[Patooka]

This has to be one of the more idiotic interpretations I have ever read. There is literally nothing in Jarhyn's post that's blase or cavalier towards the plight of whites in South Africa. That you could reach that conclusion requires an almost mythical amount of cognitive dissonance.

Please read the part I bolded. That is essentially saying, "If a few whites have to die today because they were racist in the past, then so be it."

Please enlighten me as to the correct interpretation since I seem to be "missing it."

First off, no your interpretation is bullshit. Jarhyn is basically saying whilst the actions against whites should be condemned, they didn't crop up in a vacuum. Pretty sensible point of view, no race betrayal required.
Secondly, you chose to quote one sentence out of context from a three paragraph narrative and then twist its sentiment into the most absurd way imaginable. That's a new low for intellectual dishonesty from you.

 

[Jarhyn]

Please read the part I bolded. That is essentially saying, "If a few whites have to die today because they were racist in the past, then so be it."

Please enlighten me as to the correct interpretation since I seem to be "missing it."

It totally does not say that. “Something needed to be done” does not require “civilians needed to be targeted to die.”
That is ridiculous and absurd.

What is wrong with you?



The answer was clearly given that the “something” should have been planning re-equalization of wealth to undo the vast damage done. How does that equal white people dying? Pathetic level of snowflake.

Yeah. "Something needs (really, needed) to be done" the something is the people in power unilaterally sharing power, apologizing for being dicks, and going forward in a manner to bring all the tribes of their land to equal footing, elevating rather than tearing people down.

But they resisted it so long that they forced the disenfranchised to find the only justice left to them; the justice of the mob.

If they had been so wise as to stop hoarding power, wealth, educational.assets and land, this would not have happened. We all kept saying "just quit being dicks, end Apartheid and pay reparations", and we kept saying it for decades.

Now I'm saying to the people CURRENTLY in charge: this needs to stop. Just quit being dicks, back away from reinstating an Apartheid, stop at equal rights."

But I know it won't happen. Maybe after the cycle takes a few more turns, I guess

 

[repoman]

And the previous Afrikaners in the parliament acted like soulless robots when passing their laws and the current blacks are breaking out into a happy soulful song as they do the same thing.

Shit is wild and plays so much to the stereotypes. Gotta love it.

 

[Jarhyn]

My point is that in America, today, we need to end the cycle before it starts. SA has created the roadmap to show where we are headed, otherwise.

 

[scombrid]

whites in the US are now under attack by the global elite

Oh the shadowy global elite. The global elite are also attacking the British whites, which is why the British voted for Brexit because they became convinced that they were buffering themselves against the "global elite". Italians are not convinced that the "global elite" are coming after them too. So they are electing "Lega Nord" white nationalists into office in formerly liberal places like Tuscany. So the question is really, who is selling this "global elite are attacking white people" theory and stoking white nationalist anger in from Portland to London to Tuscany to Budapest? You want a conspiracy? It isn't the white global elite trying to attack "whites in the US". The conspiracy is the people pushing these conspiracy theory narratives in order to cause political problems in NATO and EU countries. Some is from without, a lot is from corporate interests within.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

What if I said, "I hated 9/11 when it happened. But, something did need to be done about the world trade center."

Doesn't it look like I might be...MAYBE...perhaps....siding with the terrorists?

It takes a big leap of stupid to translate "something did need to be done about the world trade center" to "fly a plane into the world trade center in order to destroy it and kill lots of civilians".

Mark this day on your calendar boys and girls. I agree with laughing dog.

 

[Gun Nut]

Paul Craig Roberts, that's who!

He also said this regarding 9/11, so make sure your salt grinder is set to "coarse":

The NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology, a government agency) reports on the twin towers and building 7 are fraudulent. Witnesses at the Toronto Hearings proved that building 7 was a standard controlled demolition and that incendiaries and explosives brought down the twin towers. There is no doubt whatsoever about this. Anyone who declares the contrary has no scientific basis upon which to stand.

Oh no.. did Paul say that??!?!? Well if Paul said it, it must be the thoughts of all. Who the fuck is Paul?

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/08/16/is-white-genocide-in-our-future/

PCR makes a very good point about the white farmers in South Africa who are now under attack by the current black South African government. Some will say these are probably "just deserts" for past sins whites have done in that part of the world. All I can say about that situation, is that if I were I white person in South Africa, I sure would not be waiting around to see what happens next, Id be moving far away.

But then PCR compares that to the fake media attacks on the Trump deplorables.
Like how it is now politcally permissible to say its ok to cut Trumps head off or to shoot a deplorable. Yet saying the same thing about any other race would be not permissible.

The more I think this through, I think PCR has a point. For whatever reason, whites in the US are now under attack by the global elite and they better wake up. And soon.

Aren't the global elites white... with a lot of them in the US?

 

[repoman]

And fellow whites

 

[Loren Pechtel]

First, I find it absolutely fucking deplorable that people in SA are engaging in Apartheid again, no matter who is pulling that garbage and no matter who is getting oppressed. I don't think it is to the level of genocide yet; it doesn't need to be a death camp to be a concentration camp though; so there's still that.

That said, there has been a pretty bad issue of racial disparity in South Africa, where much of the money and power has been bound up in the hands of a demographic that has been incredibly racist in their own right. The actions taken now are bad, to be sure, though I think something did need to be done to reset the balance. This is what happens when racist policies play out: there is a day of reconning rather than a day of reconciliation. Apartheid should have ended with an acquiescence of wealth and land and power rather than a twist of arm... Or never happened at all. But no. People couldn't just split the wealth between populations and now things are getting revenge shaped.

But I don't expect certain people who don't even understand how genetic diversity and trait retention/warehousing works (and thus why intermarrying between "races" is a net positive for everyone) to understand the complexities of why forcing a coup leads to a cycle of revenge and conflict.

You're excusing it. You don't really think it's all that wrong.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Please read the part I bolded. That is essentially saying, "If a few whites have to die today because they were racist in the past, then so be it."

Please enlighten me as to the correct interpretation since I seem to be "missing it."

It totally does not say that. “Something needed to be done” does not require “civilians needed to be targeted to die.”
That is ridiculous and absurd.

What is wrong with you?

The answer was clearly given that the “something” should have been planning re-equalization of wealth to undo the vast damage done. How does that equal white people dying? Pathetic level of snowflake.

If the solution you prefer (which amounts to robbery on a massive scale) isn't implemented you're saying murder is an acceptable alternative. He's right on this one.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Yeah. "Something needs (really, needed) to be done" the something is the people in power unilaterally sharing power, apologizing for being dicks, and going forward in a manner to bring all the tribes of their land to equal footing, elevating rather than tearing people down.

But they resisted it so long that they forced the disenfranchised to find the only justice left to them; the justice of the mob.

If they had been so wise as to stop hoarding power, wealth, educational.assets and land, this would not have happened. We all kept saying "just quit being dicks, end Apartheid and pay reparations", and we kept saying it for decades.

Reality: They were working towards what you wanted them to do, other than the crap of reparations. As always, the scumbags wouldn't allow it to be done peacefully. Had they just handed over power we would have seen the same result that we have now--far more a matter of tearing down than creating.

Now I'm saying to the people CURRENTLY in charge: this needs to stop. Just quit being dicks, back away from reinstating an Apartheid, stop at equal rights."

But I know it won't happen. Maybe after the cycle takes a few more turns, I guess

But you're saying their behavior isn't really that wrong.

 

[laughing dog]

Yeah. "Something needs (really, needed) to be done" the something is the people in power unilaterally sharing power, apologizing for being dicks, and going forward in a manner to bring all the tribes of their land to equal footing, elevating rather than tearing people down.

But they resisted it so long that they forced the disenfranchised to find the only justice left to them; the justice of the mob.

If they had been so wise as to stop hoarding power, wealth, educational.assets and land, this would not have happened. We all kept saying "just quit being dicks, end Apartheid and pay reparations", and we kept saying it for decades.

Reality: They were working towards what you wanted them to do, other than the crap of reparations. As always, the scumbags wouldn't allow it to be done peacefully. Had they just handed over power we would have seen the same result that we have now--far more a matter of tearing down than creating.

Now I'm saying to the people CURRENTLY in charge: this needs to stop. Just quit being dicks, back away from reinstating an Apartheid, stop at equal rights."

But I know it won't happen. Maybe after the cycle takes a few more turns, I guess

But you're saying their behavior isn't really that wrong.

Except Jarhyn wrote
"The actions taken now are bad, to be sure, though I think something did need to be done to reset the balance. " To most people, that means their behavior is really wrong.

It takes a whole lot of stupid or intellectual dishonesty to claim that the "something must be done" in that statement means mass murder or genocide.

 

[Keith&Co.]

You're excusing it. You don't really think it's all that wrong.

I don't think so.

If I watch certain horror movies, it becomes clear which characters are going to survive and which ones are going to get their faces eaten by the monster.
The fact that I can predict the deaths, and explain how I know they're going to die, in no way means that I WANT the monster to eat their faces. It's just an observation.

Or if I watch a youtube of two kids teasing a dog, and predict someone's going to get bitten is not condoning the teasing OR the biting. it just seems sadly predictable.

 

[Jarhyn]

You're excusing it. You don't really think it's all that wrong.

I don't think so.

If I watch certain horror movies, it becomes clear which characters are going to survive and which ones are going to get their faces eaten by the monster.
The fact that I can predict the deaths, and explain how I know they're going to die, in no way means that I WANT the monster to eat their faces. It's just an observation.

Or if I watch a youtube of two kids teasing a dog, and predict someone's going to get bitten is not condoning the teasing OR the biting. it just seems sadly predictable.

Pretty much.

I WILL say there are certain characters in a horror movie I DO look forward to the deaths of, usually the racist POS, or the idiot who just NEEDS to be in charge. Sadly, these characters almost always get more than a few characters killed through their shittiness.

Of course, part of the solution also involves defanging racist elements of both sides, and delegitimizing the fulfillment of revenge, and another part involves creating the change through gradual forces such as through educational funding, free higher education, removing public funding for private education (taxing it out of existence, if possible), and through "blinding the biased eye", making our systems blind to all "bad proxies". And through public education, be truthful about history and about the present.

In government, it involves taxing the ultra-wealthy and creating social programs for the disadvantaged and underserved whoever they may be, and in elimination gerrymanders which destroy the ability of communities to select appropriate local representation.

Through the end of policies that criminalize or marginalize being members of minority and poor communities (ending the drug war).

And finally, through programs and systems designed to discourage rent seeking and enable home ownership, so as to enable self-determination.

 

[Harry Bosch]

You're excusing it. You don't really think it's all that wrong.

I don't think so.

If I watch certain horror movies, it becomes clear which characters are going to survive and which ones are going to get their faces eaten by the monster.
The fact that I can predict the deaths, and explain how I know they're going to die, in no way means that I WANT the monster to eat their faces. It's just an observation.

Or if I watch a youtube of two kids teasing a dog, and predict someone's going to get bitten is not condoning the teasing OR the biting. it just seems sadly predictable.

Pretty much.

I WILL say there are certain characters in a horror movie I DO look forward to the deaths of, usually the racist POS, or the idiot who just NEEDS to be in charge. Sadly, these characters almost always get more than a few characters killed through their shittiness.

Of course, part of the solution also involves defanging racist elements of both sides, and delegitimizing the fulfillment of revenge, and another part involves creating the change through gradual forces such as through educational funding, free higher education, removing public funding for private education (taxing it out of existence, if possible), and through "blinding the biased eye", making our systems blind to all "bad proxies". And through public education, be truthful about history and about the present.

In government, it involves taxing the ultra-wealthy and creating social programs for the disadvantaged and underserved whoever they may be, and in elimination gerrymanders which destroy the ability of communities to select appropriate local representation.

Through the end of policies that criminalize or marginalize being members of minority and poor communities (ending the drug war).

And finally, through programs and systems designed to discourage rent seeking and enable home ownership, so as to enable self-determination.

Agreed: end the drug war. Gerrymandering needs to be ended. No brainers. I like Harris, but not a super fan of increasing incentives for home ownership. A lot of people are going to lose value in their homes in the upcoming recession. People with mobile careers that need to move often probably should not buy. People who can't handle a short term drop in value probably shouldn't buy.