• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Kentucky bill would make it a crime to insult or taunt a police officer

Elixir

Made in America
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
36,260
Location
Mountains
Basic Beliefs
English is complicated
A proposed Kentucky bill would make it a crime to insult or taunt a police officer

Kentucky state lawmakers have advanced a bill that would make it a crime to insult or taunt a law enforcement officer in a way that could provoke a violent response.
It's one of several provisions included in a larger bill that seeks to increase penalties for crimes related to riots. A state Senate committee passed the bill last week.

"Hey Seargent Bubba, I heard him call you a name. Did you hear him call you a name? I could get violent if someone called me a name like that. I think we gotta take this guy in.
Hands on the car, NOW!"
 
Dear Kentucky,

Quick question; if a law enforcement officer can't take a few mean words HOW THE FUCKING FUCK CAN THEY PERFORM THEIR DUTY IN A RATIONAL MANNER?

Regards,

Someone grateful they literally live on the other side of the planet.
 
I believe legally taunting can be a form of assault.

Every year the anarchists come to Seattle and try to provoke a violent response. Rocks, bottles, firebombs.

Recently in Tacoma a lone police car arrived at a large gathering watching illegal street racing. The crowd surrounded the car shouting, rocking, and hitting the car. As he tried to move away he ran over someone. Of course the police was at fault for not having infinite patience and a desire to protect himself. Legally I do not think you can approach somebody on the street and begin a targeted verbal assault.
 
I believe legally taunting can be a form of assault.

Every year the anarchists come to Seattle and try to provoke a violent response. Rocks, bottles, firebombs.

Recently in Tacoma a lone police car arrived at a large gathering watching illegal street racing. The crowd surrounded the car shouting, rocking, and hitting the car. As he tried to move away he ran over someone. Of course the police was at fault for not having infinite patience and a desire to protect himself. Legally I do not think you can approach somebody on the street and begin a targeted verbal assault.

That wasn't just about words, that was about being a danger to the officers.

I don't see how this law can past the First Amendment.
 
I believe legally taunting can be a form of assault.

Every year the anarchists come to Seattle and try to provoke a violent response. Rocks, bottles, firebombs.

Recently in Tacoma a lone police car arrived at a large gathering watching illegal street racing. The crowd surrounded the car shouting, rocking, and hitting the car. As he tried to move away he ran over someone. Of course the police was at fault for not having infinite patience and a desire to protect himself. Legally I do not think you can approach somebody on the street and begin a targeted verbal assault.

That wasn't just about words, that was about being a danger to the officers.

I don't see how this law can past the First Amendment.

It will remain in effect until it gets overturned for that reason. In the meanwhile, its sponsors will appeal to the McConnell-worshiping morons of KY, and it will serve its primary purpose: keeping the conservotards in office.
Its secondary purpose, pwning the libs, will be fully realized. The tertiary purpose, giving further license to cops to do whatever the fuck they want to whomever they please, will also remain in effect, but since they pretty much do that anyway the effect is minimal IRL.
 
I believe legally taunting can be a form of assault.

Every year the anarchists come to Seattle and try to provoke a violent response. Rocks, bottles, firebombs.

Recently in Tacoma a lone police car arrived at a large gathering watching illegal street racing. The crowd surrounded the car shouting, rocking, and hitting the car. As he tried to move away he ran over someone. Of course the police was at fault for not having infinite patience and a desire to protect himself. Legally I do not think you can approach somebody on the street and begin a targeted verbal assault.

That wasn't just about words, that was about being a danger to the officers.

I don't see how this law can past the First Amendment.

It will remain in effect until it gets overturned for that reason. In the meanwhile, its sponsors will appeal to the McConnell-worshiping morons of KY, and it will serve its primary purpose: keeping the conservotards in office.
Its secondary purpose, pwning the libs, will be fully realized. The tertiary purpose, giving further license to cops to do whatever the fuck they want to whomever they please, will also remain in effect, but since they pretty much do that anyway the effect is minimal IRL.

That's what it looks like to me.
Tom
 
A proposed Kentucky bill would make it a crime to insult or taunt a police officer

Kentucky state lawmakers have advanced a bill that would make it a crime to insult or taunt a law enforcement officer in a way that could provoke a violent response.
Provoke a violent response from whom? If Kentucky law enforcement officers are such snowflakes, I'm staying the fuck away from Kentucky.

Here's another possibility. Remove the term "law enforcement official" from the law and make it illegal for anybody to taunt or insult in a way that could provoke violence. Police doing that isn't OK either.
Tom
 
Provoke a violent response from whom? If Kentucky law enforcement officers are such snowflakes, I'm staying the fuck away from Kentucky.

Here's another possibility. Remove the term "law enforcement official" from the law and make it illegal for anybody to taunt or insult in a way that could provoke violence. Police doing that isn't OK either.
Tom

Yes, that! I love that. Make pissing people off illegal, period.
In fact they should make it a felony punishable by up to 20 years.
If they could apply it ex-post facto, that would be even better!
 
A proposed Kentucky bill would make it a crime to insult or taunt a police officer

Kentucky state lawmakers have advanced a bill that would make it a crime to insult or taunt a law enforcement officer in a way that could provoke a violent response.
Provoke a violent response from whom? If Kentucky law enforcement officers are such snowflakes, I'm staying the fuck away from Kentucky.
It wouldn't actually provoke a response, it'd just make it okay for the police to either break up protests or simply arrest people for "taunting" and allegedly attempting to "provoke" a response.
 
A proposed Kentucky bill would make it a crime to insult or taunt a police officer

Kentucky state lawmakers have advanced a bill that would make it a crime to insult or taunt a law enforcement officer in a way that could provoke a violent response.
Provoke a violent response from whom? If Kentucky law enforcement officers are such snowflakes, I'm staying the fuck away from Kentucky.
It wouldn't actually provoke a response, it'd just make it okay for the police to either break up protests or simply arrest people for "taunting" and allegedly attempting to "provoke" a response.

And it will be used in every single police report where the cops act violently to say the person "committed a crime that provoked the response", thus making "justified use of force" a kind of tautology.
 
Provoke a violent response from whom? If Kentucky law enforcement officers are such snowflakes, I'm staying the fuck away from Kentucky.

Here's another possibility. Remove the term "law enforcement official" from the law and make it illegal for anybody to taunt or insult in a way that could provoke violence. Police doing that isn't OK either.
Tom

Yes, that! I love that. Make pissing people off illegal, period.
In fact they should make it a felony punishable by up to 20 years.
If they could apply it ex-post facto, that would be even better!

That was the first thought that occurred to me. What's the big deal with police officers, isn't anyone entitled to the same degree of respect? It sure would put a lot of politicians out of business. No more Crooked Hillary or Sleepy Joe. If a public figure is just a public figure then so is a police officer.
 
Wait a second! You mean to tell me Kentucky police haven't been using disorderly conduct laws like officers do in every other state?
 
It wouldn't actually provoke a response, it'd just make it okay for the police to either break up protests or simply arrest people for "taunting" and allegedly attempting to "provoke" a response.

And it will be used in every single police report where the cops act violently to say the person "committed a crime that provoked the response", thus making "justified use of force" a kind of tautology.

Exactly. They will claim that carrying a BLM sign to a march is "taunting and provoking" thereby shutting down ANY kind of protests against police actions. So many kids of effed up and IMO, clearly violate the US Constitution.
 
I find it hard to believe this would be legal.

I'm pretty much a free speech absolutist, aside from incitement to a crime, and the whole "fighting words" exception has never sat well with me.
 
Back
Top Bottom