• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Latest liberal outrage - protests against Emmett Till artwork by white artist

Axulus

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Messages
4,686
Location
Hallandale, FL
Basic Beliefs
Right leaning skeptic
The open-coffin photographs of the mutilated body of Emmett Till, the teenager who was lynched by two white men in Mississippi in 1955, served as a catalyst for the civil rights movement and have remained an open wound in American society since they were first published in Jet magazine and The Chicago Defender at the urging of Till’s mother.

The images’ continuing power, more than 60 years later, to speak about race and violence is being demonstrated once again in protests that have arisen online and at the newly opened Whitney Biennial over the decision of a white artist, Dana Schutz, to make a painting based on the photographs.

An African-American artist, Parker Bright, has conducted peaceful protests in front of the painting since Friday, positioning himself, sometimes with a few other protesters, in front of the work to partly block its view. He has engaged museum visitors in discussions about the painting while wearing a T-shirt with the words “Black Death Spectacle” on the back. Another protester, Hannah Black, a British-born black artist and writer working in Berlin, has written a letter to the biennial’s curators, Mia Locks and Christopher Y. Lew, urging that the painting be not only removed from the show but also destroyed.

“The subject matter is not Schutz’s,” Ms. Black wrote in a Facebook message that has been signed by more than 30 other artists she identifies as nonwhite. “White free speech and white creative freedom have been founded on the constraint of others, and are not natural rights. The painting must go.” She added that “contemporary art is a fundamentally white supremacist institution despite all our nice friends.”

The protest has found traction on Twitter, where some commenters have called for destruction of the painting and others have focused on what they view as an ill-conceived attempt by Ms. Schutz to aestheticize an atrocity.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/...-till-at-whitney-biennial-draws-protests.html

So we must first determine the color of someone's skin before we can determine if they have the proper permission to make a painting.

The important things, you know?
 
“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”
- Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr.


The olden days seem so quaint and distant now.
 
I am confused -what does this have to do with liberals as a group?

They are assuming that because these protester are black they are liberals. Racial profiling in action.

They are liberal based on their racial identity politics, duh. That you can't see that demonstrates the blinding power of this toxic idealogy.

- - - Updated - - -

I am confused -what does this have to do with liberals as a group?

Racial identity politics of this sort is the liberal cause de jour.
 
As a man, I am deeply offended the artist was a woman. A dude is just not her subject matter.
 
As a man, I am deeply offended the artist was a woman. A dude is just not her subject matter.

Let's protest together in front of the painting with the words "male death spectacle" on the back of our shirts. As a woman, she is not allowed to speak for the violence males face by other males in society. The painting must be destroyed.
 
The open-coffin photographs of the mutilated body of Emmett Till, the teenager who was lynched by two white men in Mississippi in 1955, served as a catalyst for the civil rights movement and have remained an open wound in American society since they were first published in Jet magazine and The Chicago Defender at the urging of Till’s mother.

The images’ continuing power, more than 60 years later, to speak about race and violence is being demonstrated once again in protests that have arisen online and at the newly opened Whitney Biennial over the decision of a white artist, Dana Schutz, to make a painting based on the photographs.

An African-American artist, Parker Bright, has conducted peaceful protests in front of the painting since Friday, positioning himself, sometimes with a few other protesters, in front of the work to partly block its view. He has engaged museum visitors in discussions about the painting while wearing a T-shirt with the words “Black Death Spectacle” on the back. Another protester, Hannah Black, a British-born black artist and writer working in Berlin, has written a letter to the biennial’s curators, Mia Locks and Christopher Y. Lew, urging that the painting be not only removed from the show but also destroyed.

“The subject matter is not Schutz’s,” Ms. Black wrote in a Facebook message that has been signed by more than 30 other artists she identifies as nonwhite. “White free speech and white creative freedom have been founded on the constraint of others, and are not natural rights. The painting must go.” She added that “contemporary art is a fundamentally white supremacist institution despite all our nice friends.”

The protest has found traction on Twitter, where some commenters have called for destruction of the painting and others have focused on what they view as an ill-conceived attempt by Ms. Schutz to aestheticize an atrocity.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/...-till-at-whitney-biennial-draws-protests.html

So we must first determine the color of someone's skin before we can determine if they have the proper permission to make a painting.

The important things, you know?

Seems racist unless there is something missing in the report. There again if the commented on the painting (what is it?) I think they may have a point.
 
Racial identity politics of this sort is the liberal cause de jour.
Racial identity politics is and has been the cause de jour of reactionaries and conservatives for decades. Your toxic ideology is blinding you.
 
Racial identity politics of this sort is the liberal cause de jour.
Racial identity politics is and has been the cause de jour of reactionaries and conservatives for decades. Your toxic ideology is blinding you.

..for example? Banning a picture by a white artist because he is not non-white can be called racist.
 
Sigh, everyone's a critic.
 
"Liberals", "conservatives" ... they're both overflowing with idiocies, but they all vary by individuals. So is there anything usefully descriptive in this division or is it just another variety of tribalism?

Why not just say "censorship is wrong" and go straight to the point rather than deflect from it by making it a tribal "political identity" issue? Or was it just too important to prove this or that nebulous worldview is the true or best one and 'we're superior to you'?
 
Why not just say "censorship is wrong" and go straight to the point rather than deflect from it by making it a tribal "political identity" issue?
Because he only brings it up to troll the libs...

In this case it's censorship for no sane reason simply because the Artist happens to be white. The picture itself doesn't make any sense and that I thought would have been a better reason to reject it. That is if I was on a committee selecting the works. However it is up to the committee who selected this.
 
I am not sure that the op makes any sense at all.

What is the Right now complaining about?

Hannah Black has already removed her radical post from Facebook, just like they wanted her to do.

They've won by censoring this rare, creative, but wrong opinion that most liberals were against.

I've been silent on the issue as it hasn't come to anything but free speech.

On the other hand, the Right has looked Voltaire in the face and said "we're totally with you, but we're not."
 
How is this a liberal thing again?
Seriously.

___________________

This is what I read:
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/...-till-at-whitney-biennial-draws-protests.html
An African-American artist, Parker Bright, has conducted peaceful protests in front of the painting since Friday, positioning himself, sometimes with a few other protesters, in front of the work to partly block its view. He has engaged museum visitors in discussions about the painting while wearing a T-shirt with the words “Black Death Spectacle” on the back.

Not one man and a handful of others engaging others in a discussion! (Or are they extra scary because they are African American?)

Also
There has also been a facebook group where 30 people wrote about this.
And there was some twitter traffic.

Pretty meager stuff. Not sure how this fits in with most liberals.
 
They are assuming that because these protester are black they are liberals. Racial profiling in action.

They are liberal based on their racial identity politics, duh. That you can't see that demonstrates the blinding power of this toxic idealogy.

- - - Updated - - -

I am confused -what does this have to do with liberals as a group?

Racial identity politics of this sort is the liberal cause de jour.
I keep forgetting to remember I'm supposed to be du jouring it that way.
 
How is this a liberal thing again?
Seriously.

___________________

This is what I read:
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/...-till-at-whitney-biennial-draws-protests.html
An African-American artist, Parker Bright, has conducted peaceful protests in front of the painting since Friday, positioning himself, sometimes with a few other protesters, in front of the work to partly block its view. He has engaged museum visitors in discussions about the painting while wearing a T-shirt with the words “Black Death Spectacle” on the back.

Not one man and a handful of others engaging others in a discussion! (Or are they extra scary because they are African American?)

Also
There has also been a facebook group where 30 people wrote about this.
And there was some twitter traffic.

Pretty meager stuff. Not sure how this fits in with most liberals.

They are protesting because the artist is white.They want to destroy the painting. From an artistic point of view it's garbage but from a political point of view it's racist. That is to say the definition of racist where whites censor blacks is the same as blacks censoring whites. An artist is an artist regardless of colour and race etc.
 
They are protesting because the artist is white.
Well, that's not the entire point of all of the protests. Some are worried that the art is trying to downplay the outrage this person's death should be evoking. Those people would be protesting if the artist was white, black, red, purple or plaid.
 
Back
Top Bottom