For certain values of "fine". Just end the sentence after "survive" if that's a problem.According to who?
The bar analogy is quaint but unworkable when it comes to countries. Sending paperless people to other countries on basis of "we think this is where the boat took off" years after the fact is not a realistic option. Do you think Marocco will take back people from sub-Saharan africa who sneaked into Marocco just to take a boat to Europe? No they won't. And there is no guarantee that many countries are willing to even take their own citizens back, or that they even have governments that can be contacted to arrange such a return.To wherever the boat took off from. Once they realize they can't go to Europe, they will find their way home. Or go elsewhere. Who cares?
Europe should adopt the motto of bars at closing time: "You don't have to go home but you can't stay here".
The point is that the notion that intruders who have no papers can be just "sent back" with a snap of fingers is an oversimplification. These people are going to either spend months or years in detention facilities, or more likely just disappear and become illegal immigrants either in the country of their arrival, or some other European country.
Then the people on Naked and Afraid should have done well. Free resources, no boss to take a share.
Put the dictators out there. Put Trump out there.
What can he do that has any practical value?
Make a deal?
The "who cares" referred to those mass migrants (vast majority of whom are economic migrants) who are deported or rejected from entry in the first place.The operative words in Derec's response are "Who cares?"
No, they are not "less than human". At the same time, they can't all be allowed to enter EU/Europe willy nilly, no matter who they are, how many they are, and how many more will be encouraged by their success to get it.He certainly doesn't, and a lot of people who rail against these refugees/migrants don't either, because they consider the people from sub-Saharan Africa or the Middle East to be slightly less than human.
Bullshit. I have never proposed immigration into Europe be closed to non-whites. At the same time I have proposed mass migration be opposed no matter their color.Whites only.
They are actual people. That doesn't mean they have the right to go wherever they want, just like I do not have the right to come to your home and help myself to whatever is in your fridge. Much less to invite a few dozen others to do the same.It isn't like they're actual people.
No, they're sinister swarthy types hell-bent on destroying the racial purity of glorious Europe.
The policy to pick up mass migrants off the coast of Libya and bring them all to Europe is merely encouraging hundreds of thousands more mass migrants. That leads to more deaths in transit. If this migration route was shut down, as should have happened years ago, these deaths would not occur. Perversely, it is this aiding and abetting of mass migration that is causing more migrant deaths.IF they die in transit on the way, who cares?
The boats usually sink while these migrants are trying to get to Europe. I am not advocating sinking any boats full of people (empty boats should be destroyed though) or killing anybody. But at the same time, illegal migrant crossings into Europe should be discouraged, not encouraged. The current policy of tolerating this mass migration and allowing the NGO fleets to aid the smugglers is merely encouraging more and more mass migration, which is why Mediterranean boat crossings increased 30% compared to same time last year.If they get put on a boat back to whatever swarthy region they came from and the boat sinks, who cares?
Alan Kurdi wasn't even particularly brown.That kid face down on the beach? Who fucking cares? It's just a brown kid. Probably was going to grow up to be a terrorist just like all those Muslims.
It's not about dehumanizing anybody. At the same time, they do not have the right to go wherever they want and mass migration is indeed a dangerous thing and must not be allowed.It is the oldest trick in the book. Dehumanize them and spread fear. Whether it is based in any kind of reality is irrelevant, because the sad fact is that it works.
If they weren't surviving just fine, they would not be able to have such an population explosion.According to who?
If Europe is taking all these boat migranst no matter how many NGOs pick up off the coast of Libya, then "unlimited" is the correct word to use.It can't be unlimited.
Europe is paying a lot of foreign aid to African and Asian countries. But what about the responsibility of African and Asian countries themselves?What is Europe doing about the conditions in places these people are fleeing from?
They are able to survive there. But maybe they should practice some more family planning instead of having as many children as possible.If you expect people to stay home they have to be able to survive there.
That strategy would apply to people picked up off the coast of Libya. Those people should be brought back to Libya, not brought to Europe. They left the Libyan coast mere hours earlier, not years before. That would not only mean fewer migrants reaching Europe, but would also mean that prospective migrants would be discouraged and thus the total number of attempted migrants would plummet. As opposed to the current policy of helping them reach Europe which encourages more migration, leading the migrant numbers to explode.The bar analogy is quaint but unworkable when it comes to countries. Sending paperless people to other countries on basis of "we think this is where the boat took off" years after the fact is not a realistic option.
If they left hours before, they should. They should also definitely take Moroccans who are trying to migrate. And if they don't play ball, EU should impose sanctions. Time for kid gloves is long past.Do you think Marocco will take back people from sub-Saharan africa who sneaked into Marocco just to take a boat to Europe?
As I said, if they don't play ball EU should apply pressure through economic sanctions and withholding of aid.And there is no guarantee that many countries are willing to even take their own citizens back, or that they even have governments that can be contacted to arrange such a return.
No, it is more complicated than that of course. But at the same time EU must start doing something other than counterproductive tacit encouragement of mass migration.The point is that the notion that intruders who have no papers can be just "sent back" with a snap of fingers is an oversimplification.
One way to combat that is to make the life as an illegal difficult. No social services, difficulty to obtain jobs (and heavy penalties for companies who hire illegals). That would not only make current illegals more likely to give up and go home, it would make those who think about illegally migrating think twice or thrice.These people are going to either spend months or years in detention facilities, or more likely just disappear and become illegal immigrants either in the country of their arrival, or some other European country.
Put the dictators out there. Put Trump out there.
What can he do that has any practical value?
Make a deal?
Is there any way you can actually reply on topic? Once again your response is basically unrelated to what I said.
According to reality. For every "refugee" there are always thousands of people who stay behind and continue to survive.For certain values of "fine". Just end the sentence after "survive" if that's a problem.
So according to you.
According to reality. For every "refugee" there are always thousands of people who stay behind and continue to survive.So according to you.
Is there any way you can actually reply on topic? Once again your response is basically unrelated to what I said.
I was replying to your nonsense.
You simply don't like being reminded how useless these dictators actually are.