If any trades were made on the prospect of war, it's called reading the news, not insider trading.
Yeah, it's pretty obvious what the market is going to do, insider knowledge doesn't mean much.
If any trades were made on the prospect of war, it's called reading the news, not insider trading.
They should all be barred from trading stocks, period. Either be a stock trader or run for office, but not both because it is a conflict of interest. The SEC mandates corporate CEO's can not do the same thing, yet we allow congress. Why, because they are above the law like supreme royalty? Out of 300 million in our country, we can surely find individuals who are interested in running for congress and NOT trading stocks.
And as far as someone doing better than the S&P, do you realize how hard that is if you are not cheating? Even Warren Buffet can not do this consistently and he is pretty good at picking profitable firms.
I watched the video and have some questions and comments.
(1) The 2013 law banned insider trading by Members. The 2014 "gutting" of that law, as shown clearly on the video, rescinded it for STAFF, so presumably NOT for Members.
(2) Jimmy charges MTG with buying oil stocks the day before the invasion. She immediately tweeted about her purchase! If she was acting on secret info, it wasn't secret after her tweet.
(3) Pelosi's husband was a rich trader before she was elected to Congress. Do they file joint returns? If so, her reports presumably include her husband's trading. BTW, a few weeks ago I clicked to view her reports and found that she (or her husband?) likes to buy call options. That is an easy way that anyone can beat the S&P-500 during a bull market.
(4) Insider trading is very hard to prove; I don't think Jimmy proves anything. I would support laws preventing public servants trading stocks at all; but until there is such a law Members can argue they have a family duty to maximize family wealth.