ronburgundy
Contributor
There's no evidence that she holds her religious beliefs higher than medical science in her professional dealings with babies. Just in her selection of patients to accept.On the bright side, before the doctor did this, she was already an irrational nut job willing to apply her faith to her medical profession, so it is good that she isn't their doctor anymore, and other patients can now find out and switch from this dangerous nutjob. .
I mean, it's possible the midwife's recommendation was based on a nasty demon possession she saw the doctor cure, or how she improved someone's milk production with a lark's tongue cleansing ritual, but there's nothing here to indicate she's a nutjob.
There are no compartments in the brain, and thus none in the mind. The way a person thinks and decides about one thing is a strong predictor of how they do so in others. The decision on whether to see a patient is a professional and medical one, not just a personal one. Thus, she has proven she will use irrational nutjob notions and methods to make professional decisions that impact her patients. There is plenty of room in medical practice for scientific uncertainty and ambiguity, which are the gaps into which bias and unreason seep into decision making. It is rational not to trust the medical judgment of such a person.