Generally, gods are described as supernatural beings.Myth of God
can science disprove myth of god?
what is science position TODAY that god exist or not?Generally, gods are described as supernatural beings.Myth of God
can science disprove myth of god?
This is beyond the realm of science to establish one way or another.
What science can do is find explanations for the universe that don't require gods.
Science's position today is that science cannot establish whether or not the supernatural exists.what is science position TODAY that god exist or not?
atheist's disbelieve position in god is scientific or non scientific ?Science's position today is that science cannot establish whether or not the supernatural exists.what is science position TODAY that god exist or not?
Some scientists believe.
Some don't.
.
atheist's disbelieve position in god is scientific or non scientific ?
Ask 20 atheists, you'll probably get 30 answers.atheist's disbelieve position in god is scientific or non scientific ?
atheist's disbelieve position in god is scientific or non scientific ?
It is similar to science in that it is a position that demands evidence before belief.
Ask 20 atheists, you'll probably get 30 answers.atheist's disbelieve position in god is scientific or non scientific ?
Can science disprove there's a dragon in my garage?
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/The_Dragon_in_My_Garage
Is the disbelieve position related to this dragon scientific or non scientific ?
I'm the one telling you that science can't prove or disprove a god, and you cannot extrapolate my answer from that?what is your disbelieve position in god is scientific or non scientific ?
Yeah, i don't think anyone's gone to war over the existence of the tooth fairy. Other than that, though....we are not talking about dragons, unicorn, tooth fairy
To there be gods it must be possible to have powers thatviolates the known laws of nature. Thus we can disprove gods.We can't disprove gods.
Myth of God
can science disprove myth of god?
Science requires that a claim be falsifiable. Since the Islamic god is unfalsifiable, it must be rejected on scientific grounds.It is similar to science in that it is a position that demands evidence before belief.
i am asking your rejection of god (creator of all thing) position based on what science or ignorance?
Exactly what sort of scientific experiment would you conduct to establish that an entity cannot have powers that violate the known laws?To there be gods it must be possible to have powers thatviolates the known laws of nature. Thus we can disprove gods.We can't disprove gods.
Ask 20 atheists, you'll probably get 30 answers.
what is your disbelieve position in god is scientific or non scientific ?
Myth of God
can science disprove myth of god?
Sagan described the discussion as follows:
"A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage" Suppose (I'm following a group therapy approach by the psychologist Richard Franklin[3]) I seriously make such an assertion to you. Surely you'd want to check it out, see for yourself. There have been innumerable stories of dragons over the centuries, but no real evidence. What an opportunity!
"Show me," you say. I lead you to my garage. You look inside and see a ladder, empty paint cans, an old tricycle--but no dragon.
"Where's the dragon?" you ask.
"Oh, she's right here," I reply, waving vaguely. "I neglected to mention that she's an invisible dragon."
You propose spreading flour on the floor of the garage to capture the dragon's footprints.
"Good idea," I say, "but this dragon floats in the air."
Then you'll use an infrared sensor to detect the invisible fire.
"Good idea, but the invisible fire is also heatless."
You'll spray-paint the dragon and make her visible.
"Good idea, but she's an incorporeal dragon and the paint won't stick." And so on. I counter every physical test you propose with a special explanation of why it won't work.
Now, what's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all? If there's no way to disprove my contention, no conceivable experiment that would count against it, what does it mean to say that my dragon exists? Your inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not at all the same thing as proving it true. Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder. What I'm asking you to do comes down to believing, in the absence of evidence, on my say-so.[4]