It is scary that people are so quick to believe that thread title.
How so? I think it's a pretty reasonable assumption to make, considering they place profits from gun purchases as more important the lives of children. I mean, I haven't read the article, so I don't know if the article actually says that, so one could be correct in saying that the article makes no mention of it. However, it could still be a reasonable assumption. Or it could be reasonable to assume that the NRA really doesn't care one way or the other.
