http://www.vox.com/2015/1/21/7863239/taxes-investment-yagan
Looking forward to the forthcoming denials about how investment taxes really do hurt corporate investment despite evidence to the contrary.
The case against investment taxes is one of those things that can be demonstrated in the abstract through some fairly elegant math, but it's difficult to confirm empirically. Fans of the Obama proposal will enjoy Danny Yagan's 2014 paper "Capital Tax Reform and the Real Economy: The effects of the 2003 dividend tax cut" which is probably the best recent empirical look at the question. Yagan's conclusion is that the Bush administration's big cut to the dividend tax "caused zero change in corporate investment" and had "no impact on employee compensation." It did have, however, "an immediate impact on financial payouts to shareholders."
Looking forward to the forthcoming denials about how investment taxes really do hurt corporate investment despite evidence to the contrary.