And I'm not saying they are. I'm saying that the distribution of the casualties says that Rwanda was mostly opportunistic murders. Since the primary motivation wasn't to eliminate a group I have a hard time calling it genocide even though it started out as ethnic violence.
The Hutu extremists imported millions of macheté ahead of the genodice. They had a recent census that let then know where the Tutsi lived and where "moderate" Hutsis who didn;t want to take part in the extremist anti-Tutsi campaign lived.
Radio Mille Collines deliberately upped their language, cranking up the anti-Tutsi propoganda, describing the Tutsi and moderates as cochroaches and vermins. A classic sign of a genocidal campaign
What happaned in Rwanda was most definitely a pre-planned and well thought genocidal campaign. Whatever sidelines events you think might have happened doe't detract from the fact that the massacres were preplanned as a genocide of the Tutsi people in Rwanda at the hands of Hutu Power extremists.
It started out a genocide. However, the casualty distribution shows that most of the murders were opportunistic murders taking advantage of the situation to eliminate rivals.