Or she didn't agree it made it plausible or that it even mattered. But then again, I wasn't there, so I really shouldn't comment.Why are you stuck on some assumed prohibition on making a judgement if you weren't actually IN the situation? I had to correct someone on the forum about the sequence of events in the Wilson testimony that she characterized as implausible. The missing bit of information made it plausible but she didn't seem to notice.
No, you left out a critical part of the testimony - why is that I wonder?I had to correct someone on the forum about the sequence of events in the Wilson testimony that she characterized as implausible. The missing bit of information made it plausible but she didn't seem to notice.
She noticed that you didn't make the case that you seem to think you made.![]()
[/derail]