Perfectly Reasonable Gun Owner Resolves Dispute Through Appropriate Firearm Use /s

[Jarhyn]

Perfectly Reasonable Gun Owner Resolves Dispute Through Appropriate Firearm Use

Can we please stop pretending it is appropriate for people to go around armed with deadly, ranged, easy to use, instant-effect weapons, with only their own human (in)discretion as to when it is appropriate to brandish them?

 

[Tom Sawyer]

It’s annoying that they don’t include what the condiment issue was. How are we supposed to determine if this is justified?

 

[Worldtraveller]

Holy shit, the guy's name was actually Jethroe...

 

[skepticalbip]

It’s annoying that they don’t include what the condiment issue was. How are we supposed to determine if this is justified?

Indeed, that would be crucial information. Anyone giving a Québécois a package of ketchup instead of mayonnaise for his fried potatoes should justifiably be beaten to death with a snowshoe.

 

[James Brown]

An armed Popeye's is a polite Popeye's.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Maybe he thought the Manager was actually the Condiment King and it was purely self-defense.

 

[Elixir]

Holy shit, the guy's name was actually Jethroe...

People named Jethroe should not be allowed to have firearms.
He probably thought he was going to get condoms.

 

[Jarhyn]

Holy shit, the guy's name was actually Jethroe...

People named Jethroe should not be allowed to have firearms.
He probably thought he was going to get condoms.

When really the problem with gun gropers is that they SHOULD probably get condoms. In fact, I think throwing condoms to/at idiots like this guy is probably a pretty sound policy.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Because some gun owners are unreasonable, no gun owners are reasonable.

That goes perfectly with the belief that because a gun is not useful in some situations it is not useful in any situation.

 

[Jarhyn]

Because some gun owners are unreasonable, no gun owners are reasonable.

That goes perfectly with the belief that because a gun is not useful in some situations it is not useful in any situation.

Wrong. And also a straw-man. More, because using a gun is reckless especially in situations where people believe gun use is intuitive, allowing people the opportunity to act on that intuition is reckless and destructive. Intuitive response, and gun possession do not mix. So allowing people the opportunity to act on that intuition is stupid.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Because using a gun is reckless in some situations, therefore using a gun is reckless in all situations.

 

[Patooka]

Because using a gun is reckless in some situations, therefore using a gun is reckless in all situations.

More along the lines of because using a gun is reckless in some situations, the US can never have an honest discussion about gun control and the obscene amount of mass shootings is a very small price to pay for living in The Freeist Country In The World(TM)

 

[James Brown]

Because using a gun is reckless in some situations, therefore using a gun is reckless in all situations.

Do you feel the same way about hand grenades?

 

[T.G.G. Moogly]

Because using a gun is reckless in some situations, therefore using a gun is reckless in all situations.

If someone has pointed their gun at me am I now justified in killing them?

 

[blastula]

The real problem is he should have gone to Church's first, it was right next door even. In my experience, Church's has always been a reputable purveyor of condiments.