Worldtraveller
Veteran Member
Yes, please do elaborate.It's hard to believe but I do believe the facts. It is sad.
My mom is living on the income of her net worth because she and my dad saved as if it was still the great depression. She is in assisted living. If she spends $120k per year and lives to be 100 years old, she is 83, she would still pass on to me almost $3 million.
Now I am just an industry analyst at a consulting company. But after over 30 years my wife and I have saved also as if it was still the great depression. I could retire tomorrow, live at my own current income adjusted for inflation, and still have $2.5 million if I live to be 100 years old.
Add to that the growth of my mother's money when I inherit it assuming she lives to 100 years old, my net worth when I am 100 years old would be almost $11 million.
If my mom died tomorrow my net worth would be over $5 million now, excluding my house, and almost $20 million when I'm 100 years old, still deducting my current income adjusted for inflation, today.
That doesn't feel right to me. I believe that there should be a wealth tax over some value and I also believe that there should be universal health care for all, paid by taxes, and no out of pocket costs for anyone.
Ya. Call me a rich socialist if you want but the system is rigged for the rich.
By your own telling, you and your parents were disciplined enough to put aside money for the future instead of spending it today. Why should you, your parents, or anyone else, be punished for that?
Why is paying your fair share considered 'punishment?'
I have no problem with much of what's left being taxed (hell, I don't have kids anyway) and used for the greater good. Of course, I don't really trust the government to use it for the greater good anymore, they'll just add it to the ridiculous military budget. So I plan on setting up a trust for some kind of low income tuition assistance or donating to a similar existing fund in my will.