• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Planet Nine? Or something else?

lpetrich

Contributor
Joined
Jul 27, 2000
Messages
26,334
Location
Eugene, OR
Gender
Male
Basic Beliefs
Atheist
Mystery orbits in outermost reaches of solar system not caused by 'Planet Nine'
The strange orbits of some objects in the farthest reaches of our solar system, hypothesised by some astronomers to be shaped by an unknown ninth planet, can instead be explained by the combined gravitational force of small objects orbiting the Sun beyond Neptune, say researchers.

The alternative explanation to the so-called 'Planet Nine' hypothesis, put forward by researchers at the University of Cambridge and the American University of Beirut, proposes a disc made up of small icy bodies with a combined mass as much as ten times that of Earth. When combined with a simplified model of the solar system, the gravitational forces of the hypothesised disc can account for the unusual orbital architecture exhibited by some objects at the outer reaches of the solar system.

... Since 2003, around 30 TNOs on highly elliptical orbits have been spotted: they stand out from the rest of the TNOs by sharing, on average, the same spatial orientation. This type of clustering cannot be explained by our existing eight-planet solar system architecture and has led to some astronomers hypothesising that the unusual orbits could be influenced by the existence of an as-yet-unknown ninth planet.
Another hypothesis that I've seen is that it is due to those objects themselves pulling on each other. In any case, this putative Planet Nine has yet to be observed.
 
Naw, I think they overlooked that the combined gravitational force of small objects orbiting the Sun beyond Neptune is being influenced by Planet Nine. The planet has yet to be observed due to having a poor publicist. ;)
 
There are three types of science articles, ones about Voyager leaving the Heliosphere, ones about Planet Nine, and everything else. This is about the middle, as a new study suggests Planet Nine is real... statistics make it need to be true.

article said:
A study published online in August by Brown and his colleague at Caltech, astrophysicist Konstantin Batygin, re-examines the evidence for a proposal they first suggested in 2016: that the hypothetical Planet Nine could explain anomalies seen by astronomers in the outer solar system, especially the unusual clustering of icy asteroids and cometary cores called Kuiper belt objects. The study has been accepted for publication by the Astronomical Journal, according to National Geographic.

Despite years of looking, Planet Nine has never been seen. As a result, some astronomers have suggested it doesn’t exist and the clustering of objects noted by Brown and Batygin is the result of “observation bias” — since fewer than a dozen objects have been seen, their clustering might be a statistical fluke that wouldn’t be seen among the hundreds thought to exist.
Scientists keep going between no Planet Nine to yes Planet Nine. The trouble with Planet Nine, other than a poor publicist as previously mentioned, is that no one knows where to look for it, except when a new study tells them where, and they don't find it.

So wait a few more weeks for the No Planet Nine study to be released.
 
The astronomy equivalent to hanging flying saucers from strings against a black background? It
s really there, if you just believe hard enough. The willing suspension of disbelief.
 
Back
Top Bottom