• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Poll: Free Speech values

Should free speech restrictions be expanded?

  • Option A: And I am under 35 and have never voted for a GOP candidate

    Votes: 3 18.8%
  • Option B: And I am under 35 and have never voted for a GOP candidate

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Option A: And I am over 35 and have never voted for a GOP candidate

    Votes: 2 12.5%
  • Option B: And I am over 35 and have never voted for a GOP candidate

    Votes: 2 12.5%
  • Option A: And I am under 35 and HAVE voted for a GOP candidate

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Option B: And I am under 35 and HAVE voted for a GOP candidate

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Option A: And I am over 35 and HAVE voted for a GOP candidate

    Votes: 8 50.0%
  • Option B: And I am over 35 and HAVE voted for a GOP candidate

    Votes: 1 6.3%

  • Total voters
    16
The poll is asking you to choose between two different scenarios regarding the criminal speech, and some demographic info. How could this be any more obvious? I cannot tell if you are being purposefully obtuse.

The poll isn't asking anything about speech. It's about whom people voted for. I think you are making the assumption from there that people from certain political parties support or do not support free speech.

From my rep comments, others didn't get the connection too.

The poll asks about option A vs B which is directly related to free-speech issues. Seriously, do you not get that? Are you being purposefully obtuse as a rhetorical device?

The poll also asks you to sort yourself into demographic categories, i.e. political affiliation and age-group. Why is this hard to understand?
 
Poll:
Option A: And ronburgundy doesn't know how to write an effectively communicated poll and you don't know how to participate in an ineffectively communicated poll and you are older than 35 years old.
Option B: And ronburgundy doesn't know how to write an effectively communicated poll and you don't know how to participate in an ineffectively communicated poll and you are older than 35 years old.
Option A: And ronburgundy doesn't know how to write an effectively communicated poll and you do know how to participate in an ineffectively communicated poll and you are older than 35 years old.
Option B: And ronburgundy doesn't know how to write an effectively communicated poll and you do know how to participate in an ineffectively communicated poll and you are older than 35 years old.
Option A: And ronburgundy doesn't know how to write an effectively communicated poll and you don't know how to participate in an ineffectively communicated poll and you are less than 36 yrs old.
Option B: And ronburgundy doesn't know how to write an effectively communicated poll and you don't know how to participate in an ineffectively communicated poll and you are less than 36 yrs old.
Option A: And ronburgundy doesn't know how to write an effectively communicated poll and you do know how to participate in an ineffectively communicated poll and you are less than 36 yrs old.
Option B: And ronburgundy doesn't know how to write an effectively communicated poll and you do know how to participate in an ineffectively communicated poll and you are less than 36 yrs old.

Definitions:
Option A - you think people don't like ineffectively communicated polls.
Option B - you think people do like ineffectively communicated polls.
 
I voted for Weld for Senate back in '96. Saying I voted for the "GOP" relative to what the GOP was then or what it is today, especially relative to Weld is meaningless. In '06, I voted for a Republican for Attorney General and County Engineer (incumbent).
 
I fail to see how that rises to the same level of evil as having once voted for a Republican.

I consider your implication that there is something evil about the bar-and-strip-club lifestyle to be hate speech.

I consider your saying that I engaged in hate speech to be an act of hate speech.
 
Back
Top Bottom