Underseer
Contributor
https://www.newsweek.com/sexual-ass...kavanaugh-proven-majority-republicans-1141877
Huh.
So getting a blow job with consent should disqualify someone from being president, but trying to rape someone shouldn't disqualify someone from being a Supreme Court justice?
Once again, we see the problem with the "objective morality" of conservative Christians and libertarians: according to their version of "objective morality," things are good or bad based entirely on who does them, not based on what is done.
The survey asked, "If it were proven that Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when they were both high school students 36 years ago, do you think that does or does not disqualify Kavanaugh from being a Supreme Court Justice?"
[ent]hellip[/ent]
But among Republicans, a majority—55 percent—thought a proven allegation of sexual assault does not disqualify Kavanaugh from serving on the Supreme Court. About one-quarter, 27 percent, thought it does disqualify him, while 18 percent were not sure.
Huh.
So getting a blow job with consent should disqualify someone from being president, but trying to rape someone shouldn't disqualify someone from being a Supreme Court justice?
Once again, we see the problem with the "objective morality" of conservative Christians and libertarians: according to their version of "objective morality," things are good or bad based entirely on who does them, not based on what is done.